04.09.2014 Views

Trade Policy Note Final-rev08 - Development

Trade Policy Note Final-rev08 - Development

Trade Policy Note Final-rev08 - Development

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Proliferation of FTAs<br />

Over recent years developing countries have been involved in an ever intensifying<br />

process involving the negotiation of Free <strong>Trade</strong> Agreements (FTAs), with a multitude<br />

of partners (only one WTO member has not entered into an FTA). These have<br />

included:<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

a more positive and ambitious approach to traditional efforts at sub-regional<br />

and regional integration between developing countries,<br />

extra-regional FTAs with major developed countries (North/South FTAs,)<br />

extra-regional FTAs with other developing countries.<br />

Each of these involves different policy considerations, both economic and political.<br />

Access to Northern markets, once extended on an autonomous, preferential and nonreciprocal<br />

basis, is now increasingly subject to reciprocal concessions by developing<br />

countries within the framework of FTAs. This has created a chain reaction based on<br />

the “fear of exclusion”, which has been exacerbated by the real or anticipated fear of<br />

the withdrawal of existing non-contractual preferences, even though a large<br />

percentage of exports often enter MFN duty free. 100 . The exclusion of key products,<br />

such as clothing, from certain GSP schemes has also contributed to this pressure. 101<br />

The negotiation of an FTA between one developing country and a major trading<br />

country creates pressure on competing developing countries to seek to enter into a<br />

similar agreement for fear of losing out to its competitors in terms of exports and<br />

incoming FDI. 102<br />

Developing countries are making broad concessions in a variety of areas, often<br />

adversely affecting human development prospects, in order to obtain the elimination<br />

of tariff rates that should be obtainable in the multilateral negotiations at much less<br />

cost in terms of reciprocal concessions. FTA negotiations are less transparent and<br />

more political than WTO multilateral rounds. They are thus more vulnerable to<br />

“capture” by those vitally interested sectors that can gain immediate benefits from<br />

concessions granted in return for broader reciprocal concessions which can adversely<br />

affect a wide range of less informed stakeholders and seriously restrict development<br />

policy options. This creates a bias towards inequitable results. FTA negotiations<br />

should, therefore, be subject to at least the same degree of transparency as WTO<br />

negotiating proposals and should be accessible and subject to public discussion.<br />

<strong>Development</strong> Implications of FTAs<br />

It is difficult for developing countries to achieve symmetry in North-South FTAs.<br />

They start from a situation where many of their industrial goods exports enter duty<br />

free under the GSP, albeit unbound. Bound MFN tariff rates in the OECD countries<br />

are quite low, and have been eliminated in many sectors of interest to developing<br />

countries, although tariff peaks remain in key sectors such as T&C and agriculture.<br />

Bound MFN rates in developing countrie s are often considerably higher. Thus, the<br />

100 For example, the expiry of the USA Andean <strong>Trade</strong> Preference Scheme on 31 December 2006 has<br />

placed the beneficiary countries under considerable pressure to conclude FTAs with the United States.<br />

101 Se discussion in Annex 3A<br />

102 See UNDP Asia <strong>Trade</strong> and Investment Initiat ive, The Great Maze, Regional and Bilateral Free<br />

<strong>Trade</strong> Agreements in Asia, Colombo, December 2005 www.undpprcc.lk.<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!