Trade Policy Note Final-rev08 - Development
Trade Policy Note Final-rev08 - Development
Trade Policy Note Final-rev08 - Development
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Proliferation of FTAs<br />
Over recent years developing countries have been involved in an ever intensifying<br />
process involving the negotiation of Free <strong>Trade</strong> Agreements (FTAs), with a multitude<br />
of partners (only one WTO member has not entered into an FTA). These have<br />
included:<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
(c)<br />
a more positive and ambitious approach to traditional efforts at sub-regional<br />
and regional integration between developing countries,<br />
extra-regional FTAs with major developed countries (North/South FTAs,)<br />
extra-regional FTAs with other developing countries.<br />
Each of these involves different policy considerations, both economic and political.<br />
Access to Northern markets, once extended on an autonomous, preferential and nonreciprocal<br />
basis, is now increasingly subject to reciprocal concessions by developing<br />
countries within the framework of FTAs. This has created a chain reaction based on<br />
the “fear of exclusion”, which has been exacerbated by the real or anticipated fear of<br />
the withdrawal of existing non-contractual preferences, even though a large<br />
percentage of exports often enter MFN duty free. 100 . The exclusion of key products,<br />
such as clothing, from certain GSP schemes has also contributed to this pressure. 101<br />
The negotiation of an FTA between one developing country and a major trading<br />
country creates pressure on competing developing countries to seek to enter into a<br />
similar agreement for fear of losing out to its competitors in terms of exports and<br />
incoming FDI. 102<br />
Developing countries are making broad concessions in a variety of areas, often<br />
adversely affecting human development prospects, in order to obtain the elimination<br />
of tariff rates that should be obtainable in the multilateral negotiations at much less<br />
cost in terms of reciprocal concessions. FTA negotiations are less transparent and<br />
more political than WTO multilateral rounds. They are thus more vulnerable to<br />
“capture” by those vitally interested sectors that can gain immediate benefits from<br />
concessions granted in return for broader reciprocal concessions which can adversely<br />
affect a wide range of less informed stakeholders and seriously restrict development<br />
policy options. This creates a bias towards inequitable results. FTA negotiations<br />
should, therefore, be subject to at least the same degree of transparency as WTO<br />
negotiating proposals and should be accessible and subject to public discussion.<br />
<strong>Development</strong> Implications of FTAs<br />
It is difficult for developing countries to achieve symmetry in North-South FTAs.<br />
They start from a situation where many of their industrial goods exports enter duty<br />
free under the GSP, albeit unbound. Bound MFN tariff rates in the OECD countries<br />
are quite low, and have been eliminated in many sectors of interest to developing<br />
countries, although tariff peaks remain in key sectors such as T&C and agriculture.<br />
Bound MFN rates in developing countrie s are often considerably higher. Thus, the<br />
100 For example, the expiry of the USA Andean <strong>Trade</strong> Preference Scheme on 31 December 2006 has<br />
placed the beneficiary countries under considerable pressure to conclude FTAs with the United States.<br />
101 Se discussion in Annex 3A<br />
102 See UNDP Asia <strong>Trade</strong> and Investment Initiat ive, The Great Maze, Regional and Bilateral Free<br />
<strong>Trade</strong> Agreements in Asia, Colombo, December 2005 www.undpprcc.lk.<br />
55