Trade Policy Note Final-rev08 - Development
Trade Policy Note Final-rev08 - Development
Trade Policy Note Final-rev08 - Development
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
countries struggle to ensure that their vital sectoral interests are protected. 5 The<br />
implications of such FTAs for development are discussed in Section X.<br />
Box 2: Frontiers of the Trading System<br />
Considerations of policy space should bear in mind that there has been a recent tendency for<br />
multilateral and bilateral trade agreements to overstep the “frontiers” of the trading system.<br />
As a result, governments find that their trade commitments may conflict with other<br />
instruments and commitments based on consensus , established in other international forums,<br />
which they have accepted. These include the Convention on Biodiversity, the FAO Treaty on<br />
Plant Genetic Material, the UN Convention on the Protection of Cultural Contents and<br />
Artistic Expression, the Johannesburg Sustainable <strong>Development</strong> Plan of Action, the Rome<br />
Declaration on Food Security and the Global Strategy on Health for All.<br />
To carry the analogy further, WIPO accepted that the whole set of intellectual property<br />
instruments would be incorporated into the WTO TRIP S Agreement as this gave them more<br />
“teeth” under the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. On the other hand, there has been<br />
considerable resistance from WHO and UNESCO to subjecting what are seen as fundamental<br />
rights to health, education and cultural identity to trade disciplines. The FAO, on the other<br />
hand, is actively preparing technical papers on issues related to its central goals, such as food<br />
security. The “frontiers” between the WTO rules and the Multilateral Environmental<br />
Agreements (MEAs) are currently being defined under the Doha mandate. 6<br />
The inclusion of<br />
labour standards was not accepted.<br />
<strong>Development</strong> Strategies and <strong>Trade</strong> Negotiations<br />
This new emerging trading system imposes rules on the exercise of trade policies (in<br />
the broadest sense) both through general obligations , which apply to all WTO<br />
members, and specific commitments that individual countries have accepted. All<br />
developing countries are being subject to intense pressures to enter into additional<br />
binding commitments, at multilateral, regional, sub-regional and bilateral levels, to<br />
liberalize trade and investment and accept intrusive disciplines over an ever widening<br />
scope of development policy areas. Governments in developing countries will need to<br />
make major decisions on the extent they are willing to constrict policy options in<br />
order to gain trade benefits. The dilemma they face is on how to preserve<br />
development strategies in the context of multiple negotiations with regional and extraregional,<br />
developed and developing partners.<br />
A prerequisite to participating in trade negotiations should be a clear definition of a<br />
pro-poor national trade and development policy. Such policy should be aimed at<br />
ensuring that the poor do not inordinately bear the burden of adjustment, but<br />
maximize the benefits from trade liberalization and trade disciplines. The pursuit of<br />
three complementary and mutually supportive goals, on (a) an industrial policy based<br />
on tariffs, investment and services, (b) a proactive attack on barriers to exports<br />
5 See Gibbs, Murray and Swarnim Wagle, with Pedro Ortega, The Great Maze: Regional and Bilateral<br />
Free <strong>Trade</strong> Agreements in Asia, UNDP Asia Pacific <strong>Trade</strong> and Investment Initiative (Colombo: 2005)<br />
(http://www.undprcc.lk/Publications/Publications/Great_Maze_-_FTA_-_completed.pdf).<br />
6<br />
See WTO document, “Matrix on <strong>Trade</strong> Measures Pursuant to Selected MEAs”,<br />
WT/CTE/W/160/rev.1, 14 July 2001 (www.wto.org).<br />
13