Best Policy Practices
Best Policy Practices
Best Policy Practices
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Best</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Practices</strong><br />
support to participating homeowners and conducted numerous<br />
public awareness campaigns. A training programme for<br />
local energy consultants was expanded, which improved their<br />
services and significantly contributed to the positive results of<br />
the implemented renovations.<br />
The World Bank extended a USD 10 million loan for the<br />
project, of which USD 5.3 million was allocated for homeowners<br />
to implement energy efficiency measures in residential<br />
buildings (Part A) and USD 4.7 million was allocated for municipalities<br />
to invest in energy efficiency measures and renovation<br />
of public schools (Part B). The Lithuanian Government<br />
contributed matching funds of 30% and the Danish and Dutch<br />
Governments provided the main technical assistance funds<br />
for the project. Homeowners associations had to contribute a<br />
10% down payment to be eligible for a loan.<br />
The main beneficiaries of the project were homeowners<br />
associations, that is, associations of owners of apartments in<br />
multifamily buildings. As of the end of 2004, more than 1100<br />
associations were involved in various stages of the project<br />
and 532 of them had signed loan agreements for more than<br />
EUR 21 million. A number of associations implemented more<br />
than one project.<br />
All decisions regarding participation in the project and<br />
investments were taken by homeowners associations; therefore,<br />
the project success greatly depended on how active and<br />
how motivated these associations were. Significant public<br />
outreach efforts were needed to get associations involved in<br />
the project, especially during the pilot phase.<br />
The early involvement of associations’ members and the<br />
thoroughly discussed renovation plans contributed to the zerodefault<br />
rate of the project. Technical and social monitoring of<br />
the project revealed that the performed building renovations<br />
not only reduced heating bills and increased comfort levels<br />
but also improved relationships among associations’ members,<br />
thus establishing a foundation for sustainable management<br />
of the existing housing.<br />
This was a genuinely demand-driven undertaking which initiated<br />
a societal shift in Lithuania from the “Soviet-style” centralized<br />
housing maintenance and renovation system towards<br />
a market-based sustainable system that, at the same time,<br />
provided needed support for disadvantaged families, thus<br />
promoting social cohesion.<br />
10