04.09.2014 Views

Best Policy Practices

Best Policy Practices

Best Policy Practices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Best</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Practices</strong><br />

support to participating homeowners and conducted numerous<br />

public awareness campaigns. A training programme for<br />

local energy consultants was expanded, which improved their<br />

services and significantly contributed to the positive results of<br />

the implemented renovations.<br />

The World Bank extended a USD 10 million loan for the<br />

project, of which USD 5.3 million was allocated for homeowners<br />

to implement energy efficiency measures in residential<br />

buildings (Part A) and USD 4.7 million was allocated for municipalities<br />

to invest in energy efficiency measures and renovation<br />

of public schools (Part B). The Lithuanian Government<br />

contributed matching funds of 30% and the Danish and Dutch<br />

Governments provided the main technical assistance funds<br />

for the project. Homeowners associations had to contribute a<br />

10% down payment to be eligible for a loan.<br />

The main beneficiaries of the project were homeowners<br />

associations, that is, associations of owners of apartments in<br />

multifamily buildings. As of the end of 2004, more than 1100<br />

associations were involved in various stages of the project<br />

and 532 of them had signed loan agreements for more than<br />

EUR 21 million. A number of associations implemented more<br />

than one project.<br />

All decisions regarding participation in the project and<br />

investments were taken by homeowners associations; therefore,<br />

the project success greatly depended on how active and<br />

how motivated these associations were. Significant public<br />

outreach efforts were needed to get associations involved in<br />

the project, especially during the pilot phase.<br />

The early involvement of associations’ members and the<br />

thoroughly discussed renovation plans contributed to the zerodefault<br />

rate of the project. Technical and social monitoring of<br />

the project revealed that the performed building renovations<br />

not only reduced heating bills and increased comfort levels<br />

but also improved relationships among associations’ members,<br />

thus establishing a foundation for sustainable management<br />

of the existing housing.<br />

This was a genuinely demand-driven undertaking which initiated<br />

a societal shift in Lithuania from the “Soviet-style” centralized<br />

housing maintenance and renovation system towards<br />

a market-based sustainable system that, at the same time,<br />

provided needed support for disadvantaged families, thus<br />

promoting social cohesion.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!