03.09.2014 Views

Press Release (PDF) - Stanford University Press

Press Release (PDF) - Stanford University Press

Press Release (PDF) - Stanford University Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE<br />

CONTACT:<br />

Puja Sangar<br />

Tel: (650) 724-4211<br />

Fax: (650) 736-1784<br />

psangar@stanford.edu<br />

SOMETHING TO BELIEVE IN: POLITICS,<br />

PROFESSIONALISM, AND CAUSE<br />

LAWYERING<br />

By Stuart Scheingold and Austin Sarat<br />

“This highly engaging book is both a discriminating study and a rousing defense of what<br />

it unapologetically refers to as ‘cause lawyering.’ Professors Scheingold and Sarat offer<br />

fresh views on how lawyers so often end up isolated from their personal values. They are<br />

especially penetrating in their analysis of the intricate connections between lawyers’ roles<br />

and the ideals of a liberal democracy.”<br />

—Scott Turow, author of Reversible Errors and Ultimate Punishment<br />

“This is a concise, beautifully written, and ground-breaking book that sets forth a new<br />

theoretical roadmap for a diffuse but increasingly important field.”<br />

—Lucie White, Harvard Law School<br />

“This superb new book . . . is a rich synthesis of several decades of research on cause<br />

lawyers and cause lawyering. . . . [It] is a must-read for all scholars and students<br />

interested in cause lawyers and the intersection between law and politics in the U.S.”—<br />

The Law and Politics Book Review<br />

Lawyers in the United States are frequently described as “hired guns,” willing to fight for<br />

any client and advance any interest. Claiming that their own beliefs are irrelevant to their<br />

work, they view lawyering as a technical activity, not a moral or political one.<br />

But there are others, those the authors call cause lawyers, who refuse to put aside their<br />

own convictions while they do their legal work. This “deviant” strain of lawyering is as<br />

significant as it is controversial, both in the legal profession and in the world of politics.<br />

It challenges mainstream ideas of what lawyers should do and of how they should<br />

behave.


Something to Believe In (published in September 2004 by <strong>Stanford</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>Press</strong>)<br />

explores the work that cause lawyers do and the role of moral and political commitment<br />

in their practice. It also describes the role of legal education and the organized legal<br />

profession in providing opportunities and imposing constraints on moral and political<br />

advocacy.<br />

In the United States, the relationship between the organized legal profession and cause<br />

lawyering has been ambiguous. After decades of being on the fringes, cause lawyering<br />

has taken a hold since the 1960s. This is due to the work of civil rights and antipoverty<br />

lawyering, and the work of organizations like the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, the<br />

Environmental Defense Fund, and the Center for Constitutional Rights. The profession<br />

has evolved to accommodate lawyers who construct their practices by targeting clients<br />

whose cases further the causes they believe in.<br />

Today, cause lawyers go by many names, serving many causes—human rights lawyers,<br />

feminist lawyers, civil rights and civil liberties lawyers, environmental lawyers, property<br />

rights lawyers, anti-poverty lawyers. They take different positions and advocate for a<br />

variety of political issues, such as abortion, gun control, prayer in public school, and the<br />

death penalty.<br />

The book examines “the embeddedness of cause lawerying in various institutional<br />

frameworks composed of the organized bar, law schools, practice settings, and the legal<br />

and political agencies of American democracy.” According to the authors, “the place of<br />

cause lawyering depends on its possible contributions to liberal democracy and the<br />

strategic choices cause lawyers make.” It is as advocates for liberal-legal rights, that<br />

cause lawyers occupy a shared terrain with other lawyers in the domestic sphere and,<br />

increasingly, on the global sphere as well.<br />

Biographies<br />

Stuart Scheingold, professor of political science emeritus at the <strong>University</strong> of<br />

Washington, has done considerable work on the European Community. In recent years<br />

he has focused exclusively on public law, specifically on the politics of crime and<br />

criminal justice and on law, lawyers, and social justice. His most recent publications<br />

include Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities<br />

(Oxford, with Austin Sarat) and Politics, Crime Control and Culture (Ashgate).<br />

Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political<br />

Science, Amherst College. His publications include: Dissent in Dangerous Times, The<br />

Place of Law, Law's Madness, and Cultural Studies and Law: Beyond Legal Realism in<br />

Interdisciplinary Legal Scholarship. He has four books forthcoming with the <strong>Stanford</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>Press</strong>: The World Cause Lawyers Make (with Stuart Scheingold), Law on the<br />

Screen, The Cultural Lives of Capital Punishment, and The Limits of Law.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!