Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate
Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate
Chapter 6 Analyzing the talk.abortion Newsgroup This chapter presents the analysis of the talk.abortion newsgroup. Section 6.1 focuses on the distribution of messages, types of authors and types of threads. Section 6.2 on page 90 describes the reciprocity levels of the participating authors, while Section 6.3 on page 95 assesses the threads and authors in terms of abortion density and metacommunication density. 6.1 Authors, Threads and Messages in talk.abortion Talk.abortion is a busy newsgroup. Over the course of the year, as illustrated in Table 6.1 on the next page, nearly 46,000 messages were posted to the group by almost three thousand different authors in close to 8,500 different threads. Assuming a 7-day expiration period, 1 a reader of the newsgroup would have found about 800 messages by 150 authors in 225 different threads on an “average” day. 1 The length of time an message remains available on a news site is a local decision. It varies from site to site, and even within sites, from newsgroup to newsgroup. Here, a seven day expiration period is assumed. Many sites seem to use the seven day period as their default, shortening it for 76
CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORTION NEWSGROUP 77 Table 6.1: Summary of Activity in Usenet Newsgroup talk.abortion, April 1994 – March 1995 Measure Total Daily Daily Mean Median Available Available Messages 45,729 905 775 Authors Writing Messages 2,989 156 152 Threads with Messages 8,479 242 217 By comparison with other Usenet groups, talk.abortion is among the busiest: In January, 1995, for example, talk.abortion ranked 19th among the newsgroups in terms of number of messages posted per month(Reid 1994a); previous usage reports showed the group to be ranked within the top 25 newsgroups, in terms of messages posted per month, throughout the study period. A similar ranking (Reid 1994c, Reid 1994b). 2 There are, to be sure, variations in the number of messages, authors and threads on a day-to-day basis. Figure 6.2 on page 79 illustrates the range of messages available and authors contributing during the study period. The activity in the newsgroup peaked on Day 10 of the study, with 411 messages posted in a single day. Including the six days preceding, there were 2,443 messages available that day. Other peaks in messaging behavior occurred periodically throughout the study. One possible explanation for the peaks and valleys of activity on the talk.abortion newsgroup would be an interaction with real-world events. To test this explanation, an index of the number of newspaper articles mentioning the word “abortion” was compiled for the year. 3 A comparison of the number of messages available particularly disk-intensive groups (for example, those transmitting binary files), and lengthening it for others. 2 Comparative data on the number of authors and number of threads of other groups is not, to the best of my knowledge, available. In part, the analysis presented here is intended to demonstrate the value of such data. 3 The index tallies the total number of articles with the word “abortion” appearing in the the Washington Post, Detroit Free Press, Los Angeles Times, Boston Globe, Chicago Tribune, Philadelphia Inquirer, San Francisco Chronicle, Miami Herald, USA Today, Atlanta Journal & Constitution, Christian Science Monitor and Cleveland Plain Dealer. A moving average of the previous seven days was calculated to match the measure of messages available in the newsgroup.
- Page 25 and 26: CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 25 new
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 27 com
- Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 29 Hab
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 31 pub
- Page 33 and 34: CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 33 the
- Page 35 and 36: CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 35 ori
- Page 37 and 38: CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 37 gen
- Page 39 and 40: CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 39 pub
- Page 41 and 42: CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 41 By
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3 Technology & the Public S
- Page 45 and 46: CHAPTER 3. TECHNOLOGY & THE PUBLIC
- Page 47 and 48: CHAPTER 3. TECHNOLOGY & THE PUBLIC
- Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER 3. TECHNOLOGY & THE PUBLIC
- Page 51 and 52: CHAPTER 3. TECHNOLOGY & THE PUBLIC
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER 3. TECHNOLOGY & THE PUBLIC
- Page 55 and 56: CHAPTER 3. TECHNOLOGY & THE PUBLIC
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 4 Abortion Discourse in the
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 4. ABORTION DISCOURSE IN TH
- Page 61 and 62: CHAPTER 4. ABORTION DISCOURSE IN TH
- Page 63 and 64: CHAPTER 4. ABORTION DISCOURSE IN TH
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER 4. ABORTION DISCOURSE IN TH
- Page 67 and 68: CHAPTER 4. ABORTION DISCOURSE IN TH
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 5 Measuring the Public Sphe
- Page 71 and 72: CHAPTER 5. MEASURING THE PUBLIC SPH
- Page 73 and 74: CHAPTER 5. MEASURING THE PUBLIC SPH
- Page 75: CHAPTER 5. MEASURING THE PUBLIC SPH
- Page 79 and 80: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 81 and 82: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 85 and 86: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 87 and 88: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 89 and 90: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 91 and 92: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 95 and 96: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 99 and 100: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 7 The Expanding Public Sphe
- Page 103 and 104: CHAPTER 7. THE EXPANDING PUBLIC SPH
- Page 105 and 106: CHAPTER 7. THE EXPANDING PUBLIC SPH
- Page 107 and 108: Appendix A The talk.abortion newsgr
- Page 109 and 110: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 111 and 112: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 115 and 116: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 117 and 118: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 119 and 120: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 121 and 122: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 123 and 124: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 125 and 126: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORTION NEWSGROUP 77<br />
Table 6.1: Summary of Activity in Usenet Newsgroup talk.abortion, April 1994 –<br />
March 1995<br />
Measure Total Daily Daily<br />
Mean Median<br />
Available Available<br />
Messages 45,729 905 775<br />
Authors Writing Messages 2,989 156 152<br />
Threads with Messages 8,479 242 217<br />
By comparison with o<strong>the</strong>r Usenet groups, talk.abortion is among <strong>the</strong> busiest: In<br />
January, 1995, for example, talk.abortion ranked 19th among <strong>the</strong> newsgroups in<br />
terms of number of messages posted per month(Reid 1994a); previous usage reports<br />
showed <strong>the</strong> group to be ranked within <strong>the</strong> top 25 newsgroups, in terms<br />
of messages posted per month, <strong>through</strong>out <strong>the</strong> study period. A similar ranking<br />
(Reid 1994c, Reid 1994b). 2<br />
There are, to be sure, variations in <strong>the</strong> number of messages, authors and threads<br />
on a day-to-day basis. Figure 6.2 on page 79 illustrates <strong>the</strong> range of messages<br />
available and authors contributing during <strong>the</strong> study period. The activity in <strong>the</strong><br />
newsgroup peaked on Day 10 of <strong>the</strong> study, with 411 messages posted in a single<br />
day. Including <strong>the</strong> six days preceding, <strong>the</strong>re were 2,443 messages available that<br />
day. O<strong>the</strong>r peaks in messaging behavior occurred periodically <strong>through</strong>out <strong>the</strong><br />
study.<br />
One possible explanation for <strong>the</strong> peaks and valleys of activity on <strong>the</strong> talk.abortion<br />
newsgroup would be an interaction with real-world events. To test this explanation,<br />
an index of <strong>the</strong> number of newspaper articles mentioning <strong>the</strong> word “abortion”<br />
was compiled for <strong>the</strong> year. 3 A comparison of <strong>the</strong> number of messages available<br />
particularly disk-intensive groups (for example, those transmitting binary files), and leng<strong>the</strong>ning<br />
it for o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />
2 Comparative data on <strong>the</strong> number of authors and number of threads of o<strong>the</strong>r groups is not, to<br />
<strong>the</strong> best of my knowledge, available. In part, <strong>the</strong> analysis presented here is intended to demonstrate<br />
<strong>the</strong> value of such data.<br />
3 The index tallies <strong>the</strong> total number of articles with <strong>the</strong> word “abortion” appearing in <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Washington Post, Detroit Free Press, Los Angeles Times, Boston Globe, Chicago Tribune,<br />
Philadelphia Inquirer, San Francisco Chronicle, Miami Herald, USA Today, Atlanta Journal &<br />
Constitution, Christian Science Monitor and Cleveland Plain Dealer. A moving average of <strong>the</strong><br />
previous seven days was calculated to match <strong>the</strong> measure of messages available in <strong>the</strong> newsgroup.