Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate
Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate
Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 21<br />
or common interest. Consequently, a society which supports a democratic public<br />
sphere would require its citizens to participate in it, and would view <strong>the</strong> function<br />
of such participation as both contributing to <strong>the</strong> discovery of <strong>the</strong> general will, as<br />
well as educating citizens to recognize those interests that <strong>the</strong>y have in common.<br />
This vision of democracy suggests that government is an instrument to identify<br />
and promote <strong>the</strong> common interests of <strong>the</strong> public, and not only to regulate <strong>the</strong> allocation<br />
of resources to meet <strong>the</strong> private interests of individuals. Democratic <strong>the</strong>ory<br />
which supports such a vision seeks to energize individuals as citizens; to enable<br />
citizens to identify <strong>the</strong>mselves as members of a community with an obligation to<br />
actively participate in its public affairs; to encourage <strong>the</strong>m to discover that <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
own private interests are interdependent with o<strong>the</strong>rs’ interests; and to integrate<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir private goals into public policies. To achieve <strong>the</strong>se goals, <strong>the</strong>se <strong>the</strong>ories argue<br />
that institutions such as <strong>the</strong> public sphere must be designed to help individuals<br />
discover <strong>the</strong> means of satisfying <strong>the</strong> “common wealth” without sacrificing <strong>the</strong> individual<br />
autonomy necessary to democracy.<br />
This vision of democracy is expressed in <strong>the</strong> work of Aristotle, <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical<br />
writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and modern interpretations by “participatory<br />
democratic <strong>the</strong>orists” such as Carole Pateman, Benjamin Barber and Jane Mansbridge.<br />
The key concept in this vision is <strong>the</strong> promotion of direct and public participation<br />
in political life. This participation has both a psychological and instrumental<br />
component. Greek democracy, as an idealized portrait of political life, offers a<br />
clear statement of participatory principles. As Dahl (1989, 18) has summarized,<br />
for a democratic order to satisfy <strong>the</strong> idealized requirements of Greek democracy,<br />
several conditions need be met. Citizens must be able to develop and articulate a<br />
common interest, “a strong sense of <strong>the</strong> general good that is not in marked contradiction<br />
to <strong>the</strong>ir personal aims or interests.” In order to meet <strong>the</strong> first condition, citizens<br />
would need to share a relatively homogeneous ethnic and social background,<br />
and enjoy a relatively equal distribution of income and o<strong>the</strong>r resources. The size<br />
of <strong>the</strong> democracy must be small enough to a) ensure <strong>the</strong> necessary cultural homogeneity,<br />
b) allow citizens to personally know most of <strong>the</strong>ir fellow citizens, and<br />
c) accommodate <strong>the</strong> entire polity in face-to-face assembly. The face-to-face assembly<br />
was essential in Greek thought; representative government forced citizens<br />
to abandon <strong>the</strong>ir autonomy and escape <strong>the</strong>ir responsibility for service and deliberation.<br />
In addition to participating in <strong>the</strong> Assembly, citizens were also required<br />
to staff <strong>the</strong> administrative offices of <strong>the</strong> polity; no professionalized class of bureaucrats<br />
was to be tolerated. Finally, <strong>the</strong> polity was to remain fully autonomous,<br />
avoiding treaties and associations with o<strong>the</strong>r democracies. Democracy based on