03.09.2014 Views

Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate

Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate

Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 21<br />

or common interest. Consequently, a society which supports a democratic public<br />

sphere would require its citizens to participate in it, and would view <strong>the</strong> function<br />

of such participation as both contributing to <strong>the</strong> discovery of <strong>the</strong> general will, as<br />

well as educating citizens to recognize those interests that <strong>the</strong>y have in common.<br />

This vision of democracy suggests that government is an instrument to identify<br />

and promote <strong>the</strong> common interests of <strong>the</strong> public, and not only to regulate <strong>the</strong> allocation<br />

of resources to meet <strong>the</strong> private interests of individuals. Democratic <strong>the</strong>ory<br />

which supports such a vision seeks to energize individuals as citizens; to enable<br />

citizens to identify <strong>the</strong>mselves as members of a community with an obligation to<br />

actively participate in its public affairs; to encourage <strong>the</strong>m to discover that <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

own private interests are interdependent with o<strong>the</strong>rs’ interests; and to integrate<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir private goals into public policies. To achieve <strong>the</strong>se goals, <strong>the</strong>se <strong>the</strong>ories argue<br />

that institutions such as <strong>the</strong> public sphere must be designed to help individuals<br />

discover <strong>the</strong> means of satisfying <strong>the</strong> “common wealth” without sacrificing <strong>the</strong> individual<br />

autonomy necessary to democracy.<br />

This vision of democracy is expressed in <strong>the</strong> work of Aristotle, <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical<br />

writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and modern interpretations by “participatory<br />

democratic <strong>the</strong>orists” such as Carole Pateman, Benjamin Barber and Jane Mansbridge.<br />

The key concept in this vision is <strong>the</strong> promotion of direct and public participation<br />

in political life. This participation has both a psychological and instrumental<br />

component. Greek democracy, as an idealized portrait of political life, offers a<br />

clear statement of participatory principles. As Dahl (1989, 18) has summarized,<br />

for a democratic order to satisfy <strong>the</strong> idealized requirements of Greek democracy,<br />

several conditions need be met. Citizens must be able to develop and articulate a<br />

common interest, “a strong sense of <strong>the</strong> general good that is not in marked contradiction<br />

to <strong>the</strong>ir personal aims or interests.” In order to meet <strong>the</strong> first condition, citizens<br />

would need to share a relatively homogeneous ethnic and social background,<br />

and enjoy a relatively equal distribution of income and o<strong>the</strong>r resources. The size<br />

of <strong>the</strong> democracy must be small enough to a) ensure <strong>the</strong> necessary cultural homogeneity,<br />

b) allow citizens to personally know most of <strong>the</strong>ir fellow citizens, and<br />

c) accommodate <strong>the</strong> entire polity in face-to-face assembly. The face-to-face assembly<br />

was essential in Greek thought; representative government forced citizens<br />

to abandon <strong>the</strong>ir autonomy and escape <strong>the</strong>ir responsibility for service and deliberation.<br />

In addition to participating in <strong>the</strong> Assembly, citizens were also required<br />

to staff <strong>the</strong> administrative offices of <strong>the</strong> polity; no professionalized class of bureaucrats<br />

was to be tolerated. Finally, <strong>the</strong> polity was to remain fully autonomous,<br />

avoiding treaties and associations with o<strong>the</strong>r democracies. Democracy based on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!