Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate

Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate

03.09.2014 Views

CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 18 1. the shift in political and economic systems from an absolutist to a capitalist state; 2. the development of print as the dominant mode of communication; 3. the rise of institutions to allow individuals in the newly capitalist systems to meet and deliberate with each other; and 4. the transition of these deliberating individuals into a public. To fully appreciate these developments, it is necessary to briefly recount the emergence of the earliest form of what could be called a public sphere in early absolutist states. The “representative public sphere” was the vehicle used by the monarch to “represent” his authority to the populace. There was no sense of representation in the modern sense, of delegates or members of an assembly representing others: When the territorial ruler convened about him ecclesiastical and worldly lords, knights, prelates and cities, this was not a matter of an assembly of delegates that was someone else’s representative. As long as the prince and the estates of his realm “were” the country and not just its representatives, they could represent it in a specific sense. They represented the lord not for but “before” the people (Habermas 1989, 7-8). The function, then, of the representative public sphere was to “provide an arena for the spectacle and display of authority” (Nathans 1990, 621). The “public sphere” Habermas (1989, 7) discusses here is not a social category but a “status attribute,” as “a public sphere in the sense of a separate realm distinguished from the private sphere cannot be shown to have existed in the feudal society” that characterized the early absolutist states. The earliest elements of a public sphere as a social category, distinct from the private sphere, appear as a result of the simultaneous emergence of early capitalism and the development of techniques for regular information exchange between commercial centers. The transition of the economy from a system dominated by feudal agricultural production to first finance and trade capitalism and later mercantile capitalism required a system of taxation, and the bureaucracy to support it, in order to generate the capital necessary for expanded trade. For the first time, the personal holdings of the monarchy were separated from the revenues of the

CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 19 state, and the “public authority” aspects of the state acquired meaning beyond that provided by the representational public sphere. The sphere that emerges to fill this void is “public” in the more modern and familiar sense of the term, that is, synonymous with state-related authority; the existence of this sphere is demonstrated by the presence of “continuous state activity” exemplified by a permanent bureaucracy and standing army (Habermas 1989). Hand in hand with this emergence of continuous state activity was the development of “continuous trafficking in commodities and news” (Habermas 1989, 18), the second factor contributing to the emergence of the democratic public sphere. The techniques of communication, initially letters or newsletters and later commercially produced newspapers, first developed as a means of distributing information to a limited audience, namely merchants and state authorities. It was not until information became commodified – that is, until it became apparent that a fee could be collected from multiple persons for the same information – and the state authorities began to realize that instructions and regulations could be delivered to the people through the press, that a genuine “public” emerged as an audience. Even so, although official announcements were addressed to “the public,” meaning all subjects of the Crown, in reality the direct recipients of the printed materials included only the educated classes. Habermas suggests that the increased reliance on literate materials (first, written and later printed) gave rise to new stratum of bourgeois people which occupied a central position within the public. The officials of the rulers’ administrations were its core. Added to them were doctors, pastors, officers, professors, and scholars, who were at the top of a hierarchy reaching down through schoolteachers and scribes to the “people”(Habermas 1989). The transition to a capitalist economic system and the emergence of regular sources of public information were not, by themselves, sufficient to stimulate the development of a democratic public sphere. The institutionalization of places for private persons to gather for critical discussion and debate, first about literature and art and later economics and politics, were necessary to complete the emergence. These places – coffee houses in Great Britain, salons in France, tischgesellschaften (table societies) in Germany – provided an opportunity for private persons to deliberate and discuss topics of public importance in a sphere outside that controlled by public authorities. As such, Habermas locates the idealized public sphere within the private realm, outside of and separate from the sphere of public authority. Included in the private realm, he writes, was the “authentic public sphere, for it was a public sphere constituted by private people (Habermas 1989, 30).

CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 18<br />

1. <strong>the</strong> shift in political and economic systems from an absolutist to a capitalist<br />

state;<br />

2. <strong>the</strong> development of print as <strong>the</strong> dominant mode of communication;<br />

3. <strong>the</strong> rise of institutions to allow individuals in <strong>the</strong> newly capitalist systems to<br />

meet and deliberate with each o<strong>the</strong>r; and<br />

4. <strong>the</strong> transition of <strong>the</strong>se deliberating individuals into a public.<br />

To fully appreciate <strong>the</strong>se developments, it is necessary to briefly recount <strong>the</strong> emergence<br />

of <strong>the</strong> earliest form of what could be called a public sphere in early absolutist<br />

states. The “representative public sphere” was <strong>the</strong> vehicle used by <strong>the</strong><br />

monarch to “represent” his authority to <strong>the</strong> populace. There was no sense of<br />

representation in <strong>the</strong> modern sense, of delegates or members of an assembly representing<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs:<br />

When <strong>the</strong> territorial ruler convened about him ecclesiastical and worldly<br />

lords, knights, prelates and cities, this was not a matter of an assembly of<br />

delegates that was someone else’s representative. As long as <strong>the</strong> prince and<br />

<strong>the</strong> estates of his realm “were” <strong>the</strong> country and not just its representatives,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y could represent it in a specific sense. They represented <strong>the</strong> lord not for<br />

but “before” <strong>the</strong> people (Habermas 1989, 7-8).<br />

The function, <strong>the</strong>n, of <strong>the</strong> representative public sphere was to “provide an arena for<br />

<strong>the</strong> spectacle and display of authority” (Nathans 1990, 621). The “public sphere”<br />

Habermas (1989, 7) discusses here is not a social category but a “status attribute,”<br />

as “a public sphere in <strong>the</strong> sense of a separate realm distinguished from <strong>the</strong> private<br />

sphere cannot be shown to have existed in <strong>the</strong> feudal society” that characterized<br />

<strong>the</strong> early absolutist states.<br />

The earliest elements of a public sphere as a social category, distinct from <strong>the</strong><br />

private sphere, appear as a result of <strong>the</strong> simultaneous emergence of early capitalism<br />

and <strong>the</strong> development of techniques for regular information exchange between<br />

commercial centers. The transition of <strong>the</strong> economy from a system dominated by<br />

feudal agricultural production to first finance and trade capitalism and later mercantile<br />

capitalism required a system of taxation, and <strong>the</strong> bureaucracy to support it,<br />

in order to generate <strong>the</strong> capital necessary for expanded trade. For <strong>the</strong> first time,<br />

<strong>the</strong> personal holdings of <strong>the</strong> monarchy were separated from <strong>the</strong> revenues of <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!