Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate

APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9, 1994 158
>>>The point is, it helps *children* - it protects their lives.
>>
>>I can save lots of lives with _your_ money. Why don’t you hand it
>>over?
>>
>Is there some reason why you seem to have completely reversed your
>position on this issue?
Ah...you’re learning quickly about Mr. Fischer.
>Jeez, I hate to say it.....maybe Keegan was right about you.......
Yup :-)
Article 47
Reference 161997
From ronkanen@cc.Helsinki.FI
Date Thu, Aug 4, 1994 6:27 PM
In article ,
Joe Moore wrote:
> Robert T. Weverka writes:
>>Matt Friedman wrote:
>>>I think that the pro-life movement should have taken an acative stand,
>>>publicly, against that type of terrorism and violence. Since the shootings
>>>they have condemned the violence, but that’s just locking the barn door.
>>
>>In the last shooting they took up a fund to support the murderer’s family.
>>The blood is on their hands.
>>
>
>The pro-life movement didn’t believe the answer to the holocaust was
>the murder of all soldiers at the death camps.
In general comparing abortion with holocaust only shows your
stupidity. What do you think allied forced did to the death camp guards.
POW status or firing squad? They were lucky to survive for a trial.
>They of course would
>support the families of those who were imprisoned for trying to end
>the holocaust, even if they were using deadly force.
Why? Only reason I can see is that they condone the act. Why would they
otherwise pick those families out of so many families whose "head" is in
the jail.
> Nazi’s really
>believed that Jews and other life forms were not worthy of respect
>as humans. Men called the executed masses ’figerums’ to hide the
>fact that they were killing human life. Was it wrong to impose our
>beliefs on the Nazi’s. The Jewish community rightfully reminds us
>we didn’t enter the war to end the holocaust, but to protect ourselves.