Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate
Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate
APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9, 1994 128 rohuck@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu (HUCK ROBERT O) writes: >james g. keegan jr. (keegan@helios.acm.rpi.edu) wrote: [deletions] >: : Do you get my point? >: is it that you, like most anti-choicers, need to shriek >: emotionally laden words like "kill defenseless >: children" in the hope of intimidating teh few who might >: believe you? >Readers please note - Mr. Keegan offered no proof to support his claim, >he merely threw around charges of intimidation. If you cannot address >the issues I discussed, save the bandwidth. And readers...while you’re at it, please note that Mr. Huck has been ignoring questions I asked of him. For example, when he earlier stated that granting a fetus full rights from the moment of conception was the safest alternative I asked "Safest for whom?" no reply As when I also asked him if he has the right to be inside my body against my will Oh...he must be saving bandwidth :-) >: : Furthermore, I refuse to defend myself or any other pro-lifer I know >: : against charges of sexism. >: that makes sense. it wouldn’t work anyway. >Once again, you conveniently deleted what came next. For those who did >not read my previous article, I went on to say that any woman I know (even >those who are pro-choice) know that I am not a sexist. Fortunately, Ah...and you can’t be a bigot because your best friend is a (whatever). Sorry...but your stated stance concerning abortion speaks for you, Robert. If your views discriminate specifically against a gender (women), that’s sexist...no matter what your friends think. >my friends are open-minded. Mr. Keegan obviously is not. He seems to I do not see Mr. Keegan discriminating against women here. see you doing such...who is "open-minded"? I do >have a litmus test to determine a person’s level of mysogyny. >is never that simple. Sexism As you’ll someday (hopefully) find out. Nora
APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9, 1994 129 I suppose you also support Ray Fischer’s statement below? say it is a common pro-life stance? Would you >: -- >: "A woman’s rights to her body should stop where >: the fetus’s body begins." >: Ray Fischer >-- Article 11 Reference 161392 From keegan@helios.acm.rpi.edu Date Tue, Aug 2, 1994 12:45 PM Robert T. Weverka wrote: : Matt Friedman wrote: : >I think that the pro-life movement should have taken an acative stand, : >publicly, against that type of terrorism and violence. Since the shootings : >they have condemned the violence, but that’s just locking the barn door. : : In the last shooting they took up a fund to support the murderer’s family. i’ll bet they do something similar this time. and the next time. -- "A woman’s rights to her body should stop where the fetus’s body begins." Ray Fischer Article 12 Reference 161848 From ronkanen@cc.Helsinki.FI Date Tue, Aug 2, 1994 12:55 PM followups to talk.abortion In article , HUCK ROBERT O wrote: >Bruce Cameron (bmc@mayo.edu) wrote: >: In article 78948@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu, rohuck@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu (HUCK ROBERT O) writes: > >No. But you are forgetting something. Abortion is legal in most states >throughout the entire 9 months of pregnancy. Pro-choicers have never >addressed the issue of when a person becomes a human being. If it is not >at conception, when is it? Why? To illustrate the point, I offer the >following hypothetical situation: > >Two women become pregnant on the same day. Let us a assume a standard >9-month pregnancy. The first woman delivers her child 2 months early >(after only 7 months). The child survives. The second woman aborts >her baby the day after the first woman delivered her child. If the
- Page 77 and 78: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 79 and 80: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 81 and 82: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 85 and 86: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 87 and 88: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 89 and 90: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 91 and 92: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 95 and 96: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 99 and 100: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 7 The Expanding Public Sphe
- Page 103 and 104: CHAPTER 7. THE EXPANDING PUBLIC SPH
- Page 105 and 106: CHAPTER 7. THE EXPANDING PUBLIC SPH
- Page 107 and 108: Appendix A The talk.abortion newsgr
- Page 109 and 110: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 111 and 112: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 115 and 116: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 117 and 118: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 119 and 120: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 121 and 122: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 123 and 124: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 125 and 126: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 127: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 131 and 132: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 133 and 134: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 135 and 136: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 137 and 138: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 139 and 140: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 141 and 142: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 143 and 144: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 145 and 146: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 147 and 148: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 149 and 150: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 151 and 152: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 153 and 154: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 155 and 156: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 157 and 158: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 159 and 160: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 161 and 162: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
- Page 163 and 164: Appendix B Density Scores Table B.1
- Page 165 and 166: APPENDIX B. DENSITY SCORES 165 Tabl
- Page 167 and 168: Appendix C Supplemental Analysis 16
- Page 169 and 170: APPENDIX C. SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS 1
- Page 171 and 172: APPENDIX C. SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS 1
- Page 173 and 174: APPENDIX C. SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS 1
- Page 175 and 176: APPENDIX C. SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS 1
- Page 177 and 178: BIBLIOGRAPHY 177 Best, Michael L. 1
APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9, 1994 129<br />
I suppose you also support Ray Fischer’s statement below?<br />
say it is a common pro-life stance?<br />
Would you<br />
>: --<br />
>: "A woman’s rights to her body should stop where<br />
>: <strong>the</strong> fetus’s body begins."<br />
>: Ray Fischer <br />
>--<br />
Article 11<br />
Reference 161392<br />
From keegan@helios.acm.rpi.edu<br />
Date Tue, Aug 2, 1994 12:45 PM<br />
Robert T. Weverka wrote:<br />
: Matt Friedman wrote:<br />
: >I think that <strong>the</strong> pro-life movement should have taken an acative stand,<br />
: >publicly, against that type of terrorism and violence. Since <strong>the</strong> shootings<br />
: ><strong>the</strong>y have condemned <strong>the</strong> violence, but that’s just locking <strong>the</strong> barn door.<br />
:<br />
: In <strong>the</strong> last shooting <strong>the</strong>y took up a fund to support <strong>the</strong> murderer’s family.<br />
i’ll bet <strong>the</strong>y do something similar this time.<br />
and <strong>the</strong> next time.<br />
--<br />
"A woman’s rights to her body should stop where<br />
<strong>the</strong> fetus’s body begins."<br />
Ray Fischer <br />
Article 12<br />
Reference 161848<br />
From ronkanen@cc.Helsinki.FI<br />
Date Tue, Aug 2, 1994 12:55 PM<br />
followups to talk.abortion<br />
In article ,<br />
HUCK ROBERT O wrote:<br />
>Bruce Cameron (bmc@mayo.edu) wrote:<br />
>: In article 78948@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu, rohuck@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu<br />
(HUCK ROBERT O) writes:<br />
><br />
>No. But you are forgetting something. Abortion is legal in most states<br />
><strong>through</strong>out <strong>the</strong> entire 9 months of pregnancy. Pro-choicers have never<br />
>addressed <strong>the</strong> issue of when a person becomes a human being. If it is not<br />
>at conception, when is it? Why? To illustrate <strong>the</strong> point, I offer <strong>the</strong><br />
>following hypo<strong>the</strong>tical situation:<br />
><br />
>Two women become pregnant on <strong>the</strong> same day. Let us a assume a standard<br />
>9-month pregnancy. The first woman delivers her child 2 months early<br />
>(after only 7 months). The child survives. The second woman aborts<br />
>her baby <strong>the</strong> day after <strong>the</strong> first woman delivered her child. If <strong>the</strong>