Boyer diss 2009 1046..

Boyer diss 2009 1046.. Boyer diss 2009 1046..

pages.nycep.org
from pages.nycep.org More from this publisher
01.09.2014 Views

carpolestid bulla is not split into chambers, and carpolestids must be considered as exhibiting the “absent” state for cranial character 24 of Bloch and Silcox (2006). For postcranial character 4, “Position of deltopectoral crest on humerus,” Bloch et al. (2007) coded plesiadapids as polymorphic (0, 1) with some having a laterally positioned crest and others having an anteriorly positioned crest. They based this polymorphic coding on P. cookei (UM 87990) exhibiting an anteriorly positioned crest, as contrasted with P. tricuspidens, P. walbeckensis and N. intermedius (USNM 442229) which exhibit a laterally positioned crest. Additional specimens including those of cf. Pr. gaoi (UALVP 49114) and P. rex (UM 64588) are observed to also have a laterally positioned crest. This allows the ancestral node for Plesiadapidae to be optimized as having the lateral position state. For postcranial character 10, “Morphology of the ulnar trochlea on humerus,” Bloch et al. (2007) coded Plesiadapidae with the “0” state, indicating “only a medial ridge present.” However, Pr. gaoi (UALVP 49114), P. rex (UM 64588) and many P. tricuspidens specimens exhibit a lateral ridge as well. Optimization reconstructs the ancestral node of Plesiadapidae as having a medial and lateral ridge (state “1”). For postcranial character 21, Bloch et al. (2007) coded plesiadapids with a “question mark,” indicating that it was not known whether any plesiadapid had a nail on any of its digits. However, the skeleton of Plesiadapis insignis in Gingerich (1976) illustrates the presence of claws on all pedal digits, and all manual digits except for the pollex, which is obscured. Furthermore, the form of the hallucal and pollical proximal phalanges of P. tricuspidens and Nannodectes (see Chapter 4) suggest the presence of claws, rather than nails. 516

For postcranial character 30, “Plantodistal process of entocuneiform,” Bloch et al. (2007) coded the Plesiadapidae as polymorphic (0, 1) indicating that some taxa have a “strong” process, while others have one that is “reduced or absent.” This was based on the observation that the entocuneiform attributed to the skeleton of P. cookei (UM 87990) lacks a strong plantodistal process. However, my reassessment of this bone is that it is so different from the entocuneiform of other plesiadapids (P. tricuspidens: MNHN R 416, MNHN R 5359, MNHN R 5331; cf. P. anceps AMNH 92011 – see Szalay and Dagosto, 1988) and plesiadapiforms (Sargis et al. 2007), that it must be tentatively considered as incorrectly attributed to UM 87990. Whether or not this is correct, the presence of a strong plantodistal process in P. tricuspidens and cf. P. anceps allows me to re-code plesiadapids as having the “0” state only. For postcranial character 32, Bloch et al. (2007) coded Plesiadapidae as polymorphic (0, 1) for the presence of “cranial buttressing” on the acetabulum. However, all plesiadapids known for this morphology (N. gidleyi AMNH 17409, AMNH 17379; P. tricuspidens MNHN R 448; P. cookei UM 87990) exhibit the “1” state as compared to tupaiid treeshrews, for instance. I therefore re-coded the group in this way. For postcranial character 54, “Length of pubic symphysis,” Bloch et al. (2007) coded plesiadapids with the “0” state, indicating a “long” pubic symphysis. However, the only plesiadapid with a complete symphyseal region on the innominate is P. cookei (UM 87990). In Chapter 4, I discuss its morphology, which is revealed to be more like that of Cynocephalus volans. C. volans has a “short” pubic symphysis compared to those of paromomyid plesiadapiforms, which have a “long” pubic symphysis (Boyer and Bloch 517

carpolestid bulla is not split into chambers, and carpolestids must be considered as<br />

exhibiting the “absent” state for cranial character 24 of Bloch and Silcox (2006).<br />

For postcranial character 4, “Position of deltopectoral crest on humerus,” Bloch et<br />

al. (2007) coded plesiadapids as polymorphic (0, 1) with some having a laterally<br />

positioned crest and others having an anteriorly positioned crest. They based this<br />

polymorphic coding on P. cookei (UM 87990) exhibiting an anteriorly positioned crest,<br />

as contrasted with P. tricuspidens, P. walbeckensis and N. intermedius (USNM 442229)<br />

which exhibit a laterally positioned crest. Additional specimens including those of cf.<br />

Pr. gaoi (UALVP 49114) and P. rex (UM 64588) are observed to also have a laterally<br />

positioned crest. This allows the ancestral node for Plesiadapidae to be optimized as<br />

having the lateral position state.<br />

For postcranial character 10, “Morphology of the ulnar trochlea on humerus,”<br />

Bloch et al. (2007) coded Plesiadapidae with the “0” state, indicating “only a medial<br />

ridge present.” However, Pr. gaoi (UALVP 49114), P. rex (UM 64588) and many P.<br />

tricuspidens specimens exhibit a lateral ridge as well. Optimization reconstructs the<br />

ancestral node of Plesiadapidae as having a medial and lateral ridge (state “1”).<br />

For postcranial character 21, Bloch et al. (2007) coded plesiadapids with a<br />

“question mark,” indicating that it was not known whether any plesiadapid had a nail on<br />

any of its digits. However, the skeleton of Plesiadapis insignis in Gingerich (1976)<br />

illustrates the presence of claws on all pedal digits, and all manual digits except for the<br />

pollex, which is obscured. Furthermore, the form of the hallucal and pollical proximal<br />

phalanges of P. tricuspidens and Nannodectes (see Chapter 4) suggest the presence of<br />

claws, rather than nails.<br />

516

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!