Boyer diss 2009 1046..
Boyer diss 2009 1046.. Boyer diss 2009 1046..
Table 4.38A. Plesiadapid body mass estimates (gm) based on Gingerich (1990). Abbreviations: Trk – trunk (thorax +lumbus), H – humerus, U – ulna, R – radius, MC III – metacarpal 3, F – femur, T – tibia, MT III – metatarsal 3. L – length, D – parasagittal (anterposterior) diameter. P. cookei P. tricuspidens P. n. sp. P. rex P. churchilli P. insignis N. intermedius N. gidleyi Pr. gaoi H-L 2934 2434 -- -- -- 425 -- -- -- U-L 2752 2488 -- -- -- 241 347 -- -- Mc-L 1432 1635 1379 -- -- 372 365 406 776 F-L 2461 1777 1852 -- -- 543 -- -- -- T-L 1687 -- -- -- -- 248 229 -- -- Mt-L 1330 -- 805 -- -- -- -- -- -- H-D 2394 3178 -- 498 -- 1691 352 -- 994 U-D -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Mc-D 1321 1492 1118 -- -- -- 174 161 472 F-D 1984 1729 1341 -- 923 1573 415 599 -- T-D 1670 -- -- -- -- 1170 266 403 -- Mt-D 953 -- 752 -- 290 -- 172 -- 489 Table 4.38B. Plesiadapid body mass estimates (gm) based on unpublished primate sample. Abbreviations: Trk – trunk (thorax +lumbus), H – humerus, U – ulna, R – radius, MC III – metacarpal 3, F – femur, T – tibia, MT III – metatarsal 3. L – length, D – parasagittal (anterposterior) diameter. P. cookei P. tricuspidens P. n. sp. P. rex P. churchilli P. insignis N. intermedius N. gidleyi Pr. gaoi H-L 1274 1082 -- -- -- 235 -- -- -- U-L 1509 1383 -- -- -- 181 249 -- -- Mc-L 1632 1818 1583 -- -- 546 538 586 992 F-L 917 640 670 -- -- 173 -- -- -- T-L 984 -- -- -- -- 134 123 -- -- Mt-L 1705 -- 1108 -- -- -- -- -- -- H-D 2122 2787 -- 469 -- 1518 336 -- 911 U-D 2888 2566 -- 790 -- 1193 583 690 -- Mc-D 1678 1869 1448 -- -- -- 280 261 675 F-D 1492 1308 1026 -- 719 1196 335 476 -- T-D 2730 -- -- -- -- 2005 556 796 -- Mt-D 1897 -- 1528 -- 639 -- 396 -- 1030 430
Table 4.38C. Summary of plesiadapid body mass estimates (in grams). Abbreviations: L – length, D – parasagittal (anteroposterior) diameter, CV – coefficient of variation. Gingerich 1990 P. cookei P. tricuspidens P. n. sp. P. rex P. churchilli P. insignis N. intermedius N. gidleyi Pr. gaoi L mean a 2099 2084 1345 -- -- 366 314 406 776 L CV 33 21 32 -- -- 35 24 -- -- D mean 1665 2133 1070 498 607 1478 276 388 651 Diameter CV 34 43 28 -- 74 18 39 57 46 Total mean 1898 2105 1208 498 607 783 290 392 682 Total CV 34 29 34 -- 74 77 32 46 37 % P. cookei (L) 100 99 64 -- -- 17 15 19 37 % P. cookei (D) 100 128 64 30 36 89* 17 23 39 Primate sample L mean 1334 1231 1120 -- -- 254 303 586 992 L CV 25 40 33 -- -- 66 70 -- -- D mean 2134 2132 1334 630 679 1478 414 556 872 D CV 26 32 20 -- 8 26 30 43 21 Total mean 1734 1681 1227 630 679 798 377 562 902 Total CV 35 43 29 -- 8 87 41 37 18 % P. cookei (L) a 100 92 84 -- -- 19 23 44 74 % P. cookei (D) 100 100 63 29 32 69* 19 26 41 % P. cookei (skull) b 100 102 -- -- -- 11 11 21 19 % P. cookei (skull) b 100 102 -- -- -- 6 6 13 13 a – mass prediction given as a percentage of P. cookei’s estimated mass b – percentage body mass of P. cookei assuming skull length and body mass scale isometrically c – percentage body mass of P. cookei assuming log 10 skull length relates to log 10 body mass (in kg) by y = 3.81x – 7.01. This regression is based on the “horizontal primate” sample of Silcox et al. (in press) * Long bone diameters of P. insignis seem exceptionally large for its other dimensions and are likely to have been distorted by being crushed flat during preservation 431
- Page 407 and 408: third metacarpal, similar to arbore
- Page 409 and 410: autapomorphy, because it appears th
- Page 411 and 412: Jenkins (1974) found that Tupaia gl
- Page 413 and 414: Nannodectes and other plesiadapids,
- Page 415 and 416: are consistent with more frequent u
- Page 417 and 418: differences generated from informat
- Page 419 and 420: Perry, M. Silcox, R. Secord and man
- Page 421 and 422: ubriventer: implications for the fu
- Page 423 and 424: Linnaeus, C., 1758. Systema naturae
- Page 425 and 426: Stern, J.T.,Jr., 1988. Essentials o
- Page 427 and 428: Table 4.3A. Measurements of the pro
- Page 429 and 430: Table 4.3C. Comparative shape varia
- Page 431 and 432: Table 4.5A. Measurements and shape
- Page 433 and 434: Table 4.10. Measurements and shape
- Page 435 and 436: Table 4.13. Measurements of plesiad
- Page 437 and 438: Table 4.15. Measurements of plesiad
- Page 439 and 440: Table 4.17B. Measurements of the di
- Page 441 and 442: Table 4.18B. Measurements of the di
- Page 443 and 444: Table 4.20B. Measurements 11-18 of
- Page 445 and 446: Table 4.21A. Measurements 1-10 and
- Page 447 and 448: Table 4.23. Measurements and shape
- Page 449 and 450: Table 4.26. Measurements of plesiad
- Page 451 and 452: Table 4.28. Measurements of plesiad
- Page 453 and 454: Table 4.32. Measurements of plesiad
- Page 455 and 456: Table 4.35. Body segment lengths (m
- Page 457: Table 4.37A. Parameters for Gingeri
- Page 461 and 462: Appendix Table 4.1B. Plesiadapis co
- Page 463 and 464: Appendix Table 4.3. Other plesiadap
- Page 465 and 466: Figure 4.2. Plesiadapis cookei (UM
- Page 467 and 468: Figure 4.4. Plot of principal coord
- Page 469 and 470: Figure 4.6. Surface reconstructions
- Page 471 and 472: Figure 4.8. Surface reconstructions
- Page 473 and 474: Figure 4.9. Surface reconstructions
- Page 475 and 476: Figure 4.10. Surface reconstruction
- Page 477 and 478: Figure 4.12. Surface reconstruction
- Page 479 and 480: Figure 4.13. Surface reconstruction
- Page 481 and 482: Figure 4.14. Plesiadapis cookei or
- Page 483 and 484: Figure 4.15. Surface reconstruction
- Page 485 and 486: Figure 4.17. Plot of principal coor
- Page 487 and 488: Figure 4.19. Plesiadapis cookei (UM
- Page 489 and 490: Figure 4.21. Plesiadapis cookei (UM
- Page 491 and 492: Figure 4.23. Plesiadapis cookei (UM
- Page 493 and 494: Figure 4.24. Plesiadapis cookei (UM
- Page 495 and 496: Figure 4.25. Surface reconstruction
- Page 497: Figure 4.27. Plesiadapis cookei (UM
- Page 500 and 501: Figure 4.30 472
- Page 502 and 503: Figure 4.31. Measurements of astrag
- Page 504 and 505: Figure 4.33 476
- Page 506 and 507: Figure 4.34. Measurements of calcan
Table 4.38C. Summary of plesiadapid body mass estimates (in grams). Abbreviations: L<br />
– length, D – parasagittal (anteroposterior) diameter, CV – coefficient of variation.<br />
Gingerich 1990<br />
P. cookei P. tricuspidens P. n. sp. P. rex P. churchilli P. insignis N. intermedius N. gidleyi Pr. gaoi<br />
L mean a 2099 2084 1345 -- -- 366 314 406 776<br />
L CV 33 21 32 -- -- 35 24 -- --<br />
D mean 1665 2133 1070 498 607 1478 276 388 651<br />
Diameter CV 34 43 28 -- 74 18 39 57 46<br />
Total mean 1898 2105 1208 498 607 783 290 392 682<br />
Total CV 34 29 34 -- 74 77 32 46 37<br />
% P. cookei (L) 100 99 64 -- -- 17 15 19 37<br />
% P. cookei (D) 100 128 64 30 36 89* 17 23 39<br />
Primate sample<br />
L mean 1334 1231 1120 -- -- 254 303 586 992<br />
L CV 25 40 33 -- -- 66 70 -- --<br />
D mean 2134 2132 1334 630 679 1478 414 556 872<br />
D CV 26 32 20 -- 8 26 30 43 21<br />
Total mean 1734 1681 1227 630 679 798 377 562 902<br />
Total CV 35 43 29 -- 8 87 41 37 18<br />
% P. cookei (L) a 100 92 84 -- -- 19 23 44 74<br />
% P. cookei (D) 100 100 63 29 32 69* 19 26 41<br />
% P. cookei (skull) b 100 102 -- -- -- 11 11 21 19<br />
% P. cookei (skull) b 100 102 -- -- -- 6 6 13 13<br />
a – mass prediction given as a percentage of P. cookei’s estimated mass<br />
b – percentage body mass of P. cookei assuming skull length and body mass scale<br />
isometrically<br />
c – percentage body mass of P. cookei assuming log 10 skull length relates to log 10 body<br />
mass (in kg) by y = 3.81x – 7.01. This regression is based on the “horizontal primate”<br />
sample of Silcox et al. (in press)<br />
* Long bone diameters of P. insignis seem exceptionally large for its other dimensions<br />
and are likely to have been distorted by being crushed flat during preservation<br />
431