Boyer diss 2009 1046..

Boyer diss 2009 1046.. Boyer diss 2009 1046..

pages.nycep.org
from pages.nycep.org More from this publisher
01.09.2014 Views

Table 4.38A. Plesiadapid body mass estimates (gm) based on Gingerich (1990). Abbreviations: Trk – trunk (thorax +lumbus), H – humerus, U – ulna, R – radius, MC III – metacarpal 3, F – femur, T – tibia, MT III – metatarsal 3. L – length, D – parasagittal (anterposterior) diameter. P. cookei P. tricuspidens P. n. sp. P. rex P. churchilli P. insignis N. intermedius N. gidleyi Pr. gaoi H-L 2934 2434 -- -- -- 425 -- -- -- U-L 2752 2488 -- -- -- 241 347 -- -- Mc-L 1432 1635 1379 -- -- 372 365 406 776 F-L 2461 1777 1852 -- -- 543 -- -- -- T-L 1687 -- -- -- -- 248 229 -- -- Mt-L 1330 -- 805 -- -- -- -- -- -- H-D 2394 3178 -- 498 -- 1691 352 -- 994 U-D -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Mc-D 1321 1492 1118 -- -- -- 174 161 472 F-D 1984 1729 1341 -- 923 1573 415 599 -- T-D 1670 -- -- -- -- 1170 266 403 -- Mt-D 953 -- 752 -- 290 -- 172 -- 489 Table 4.38B. Plesiadapid body mass estimates (gm) based on unpublished primate sample. Abbreviations: Trk – trunk (thorax +lumbus), H – humerus, U – ulna, R – radius, MC III – metacarpal 3, F – femur, T – tibia, MT III – metatarsal 3. L – length, D – parasagittal (anterposterior) diameter. P. cookei P. tricuspidens P. n. sp. P. rex P. churchilli P. insignis N. intermedius N. gidleyi Pr. gaoi H-L 1274 1082 -- -- -- 235 -- -- -- U-L 1509 1383 -- -- -- 181 249 -- -- Mc-L 1632 1818 1583 -- -- 546 538 586 992 F-L 917 640 670 -- -- 173 -- -- -- T-L 984 -- -- -- -- 134 123 -- -- Mt-L 1705 -- 1108 -- -- -- -- -- -- H-D 2122 2787 -- 469 -- 1518 336 -- 911 U-D 2888 2566 -- 790 -- 1193 583 690 -- Mc-D 1678 1869 1448 -- -- -- 280 261 675 F-D 1492 1308 1026 -- 719 1196 335 476 -- T-D 2730 -- -- -- -- 2005 556 796 -- Mt-D 1897 -- 1528 -- 639 -- 396 -- 1030 430

Table 4.38C. Summary of plesiadapid body mass estimates (in grams). Abbreviations: L – length, D – parasagittal (anteroposterior) diameter, CV – coefficient of variation. Gingerich 1990 P. cookei P. tricuspidens P. n. sp. P. rex P. churchilli P. insignis N. intermedius N. gidleyi Pr. gaoi L mean a 2099 2084 1345 -- -- 366 314 406 776 L CV 33 21 32 -- -- 35 24 -- -- D mean 1665 2133 1070 498 607 1478 276 388 651 Diameter CV 34 43 28 -- 74 18 39 57 46 Total mean 1898 2105 1208 498 607 783 290 392 682 Total CV 34 29 34 -- 74 77 32 46 37 % P. cookei (L) 100 99 64 -- -- 17 15 19 37 % P. cookei (D) 100 128 64 30 36 89* 17 23 39 Primate sample L mean 1334 1231 1120 -- -- 254 303 586 992 L CV 25 40 33 -- -- 66 70 -- -- D mean 2134 2132 1334 630 679 1478 414 556 872 D CV 26 32 20 -- 8 26 30 43 21 Total mean 1734 1681 1227 630 679 798 377 562 902 Total CV 35 43 29 -- 8 87 41 37 18 % P. cookei (L) a 100 92 84 -- -- 19 23 44 74 % P. cookei (D) 100 100 63 29 32 69* 19 26 41 % P. cookei (skull) b 100 102 -- -- -- 11 11 21 19 % P. cookei (skull) b 100 102 -- -- -- 6 6 13 13 a – mass prediction given as a percentage of P. cookei’s estimated mass b – percentage body mass of P. cookei assuming skull length and body mass scale isometrically c – percentage body mass of P. cookei assuming log 10 skull length relates to log 10 body mass (in kg) by y = 3.81x – 7.01. This regression is based on the “horizontal primate” sample of Silcox et al. (in press) * Long bone diameters of P. insignis seem exceptionally large for its other dimensions and are likely to have been distorted by being crushed flat during preservation 431

Table 4.38C. Summary of plesiadapid body mass estimates (in grams). Abbreviations: L<br />

– length, D – parasagittal (anteroposterior) diameter, CV – coefficient of variation.<br />

Gingerich 1990<br />

P. cookei P. tricuspidens P. n. sp. P. rex P. churchilli P. insignis N. intermedius N. gidleyi Pr. gaoi<br />

L mean a 2099 2084 1345 -- -- 366 314 406 776<br />

L CV 33 21 32 -- -- 35 24 -- --<br />

D mean 1665 2133 1070 498 607 1478 276 388 651<br />

Diameter CV 34 43 28 -- 74 18 39 57 46<br />

Total mean 1898 2105 1208 498 607 783 290 392 682<br />

Total CV 34 29 34 -- 74 77 32 46 37<br />

% P. cookei (L) 100 99 64 -- -- 17 15 19 37<br />

% P. cookei (D) 100 128 64 30 36 89* 17 23 39<br />

Primate sample<br />

L mean 1334 1231 1120 -- -- 254 303 586 992<br />

L CV 25 40 33 -- -- 66 70 -- --<br />

D mean 2134 2132 1334 630 679 1478 414 556 872<br />

D CV 26 32 20 -- 8 26 30 43 21<br />

Total mean 1734 1681 1227 630 679 798 377 562 902<br />

Total CV 35 43 29 -- 8 87 41 37 18<br />

% P. cookei (L) a 100 92 84 -- -- 19 23 44 74<br />

% P. cookei (D) 100 100 63 29 32 69* 19 26 41<br />

% P. cookei (skull) b 100 102 -- -- -- 11 11 21 19<br />

% P. cookei (skull) b 100 102 -- -- -- 6 6 13 13<br />

a – mass prediction given as a percentage of P. cookei’s estimated mass<br />

b – percentage body mass of P. cookei assuming skull length and body mass scale<br />

isometrically<br />

c – percentage body mass of P. cookei assuming log 10 skull length relates to log 10 body<br />

mass (in kg) by y = 3.81x – 7.01. This regression is based on the “horizontal primate”<br />

sample of Silcox et al. (in press)<br />

* Long bone diameters of P. insignis seem exceptionally large for its other dimensions<br />

and are likely to have been distorted by being crushed flat during preservation<br />

431

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!