Boyer diss 2009 1046..
Boyer diss 2009 1046.. Boyer diss 2009 1046..
etween N. gidleyi and other plesiadapids — a convex, rather than concave lateral condyle, as seen in tree squirrels and treeshrews — is also consistent with agile pronograde locomotion. Fibula Description.—The fibula is known from fewer plesiadapid specimens even than the tibia. However, both right and left fragmentary fibulae are preserved with UM 87990 (Figs. 4.27, 28; Table 4.19). The right side has an undistorted complete diaphysis, the left is broken, and shifted (this seems to be postmortem breakage). The epiphyses are missing from both elements. The proximal end of the shaft, where the epiphysis would have sutured, is expanded anteromedially to posterolaterally, but is narrow in the perpendicular direction. Thus the proximal shaft can be described as “blade-like.” Approximately 2 mm distal to the proximal end, the shaft depth narrows to about two-thirds its proximal end depth. Farther distally, the shaft continues to narrow gradually until just prior to reaching the distal end, where it flares out in all directions and develops an anteromedially oriented rugosity, which would have contacted the fibular notch of the tibia, just posterior to the tibia’s crest for the anterior tibiofibular ligament. The anteromedial “edge” of the “blade” of the fibula’s proximal end is concave, while the posterior posterolateral margin is convex. The proximal end of the anterolateral surface has a proximodistally oriented crest toward the anterior margin that separates this bone into a smaller, more anteriorly-facing surface and a posterior more laterally-facing surface. The more anterior surface is that typically referred to as the anterior surface with medial and lateral lips (Stern, 1988), while the larger, more posterior surface is equivalent 338
to the peroneal surface. The peroneal surface is slightly concave at the proximal end, but becomes convex farther distally. The posteromedial surface is marked by a sharp, posteromedially projecting crest that separates this surface into anterior and posterior regions of roughly equal anteroposterior dimensions. The surface posterolateral to this crest is that typically referred to as the posterior, or “flexor surface,” whereas the more anteromedial one is that referred to as the medial or “tibialis posterior surface ” (Stern, 1988). Followed distally, the crest separates these two surfaces arcs anteriorly, converging on another crest, the interosseous crest, which has its proximal origin from the medial lip of the “anterior” surface. Function.—A striking feature of the fibula is the blade-like crest projecting posterolaterally from the proximal end. This crest extends the posterior or “flexor surface” of the fibula proximally, far beyond its limit in humans, for instance. This crest would greatly augment the area of origin for both the flexor digitorum fibularis muscle on the posteromedial side of the crest and the peroneus longus muscle on the opposite side (anterolateral). Thus, functions associated with these muscles, such as forceful flexion of the digits and eversion of the foot, may have been enhanced. The rugose tuberosity for the fibular notch on the medial aspect of the distal end suggests a strong tibiofibular syndesmosis, and thus limited mobility between the tibia and fibula. Comparison.—I was unable to locate the only other plesiadapid fibula specimen available for comparison (a distal end of P. tricuspidens MNHN BR-11-L: Beard, 1989). Beard only mentions the presence of a distal articular surface for the tibia being present, and suggests a synovial joint existed, instead of a syndesmosis. Thus either these two taxa had vastly different distal fibulae, or our interpretations differ markedly. 339
- Page 315 and 316: Humerus Description.—The right an
- Page 317 and 318: epicondyle actually projects somewh
- Page 319 and 320: cookei is absolutely longer than an
- Page 321 and 322: tuberosity. This crest probably del
- Page 323 and 324: olecranon process to estimate its t
- Page 325 and 326: distinct, convex distal radial face
- Page 327 and 328: of the midcarpal joint), and its pr
- Page 329 and 330: (there is no evidence for more than
- Page 331 and 332: matches the opposing facet on the t
- Page 333 and 334: mobility at the trapezoid-trapezium
- Page 335 and 336: Function.—The three proximal carp
- Page 337 and 338: the bone presently being described:
- Page 339 and 340: the “set 2” MC II is a larger,
- Page 341 and 342: differs from MC II and III in havin
- Page 343 and 344: even more pronounced. The distal en
- Page 345 and 346: etween the distal carpals and the
- Page 347 and 348: have stouter shaft diameters for th
- Page 349 and 350: difference makes them more like kno
- Page 351 and 352: antipronograde clinging postures, o
- Page 353 and 354: foramina, and faces slightly proxim
- Page 355 and 356: spine at the superior tip of the il
- Page 357 and 358: the thigh (Gambaryan, 1974). The ha
- Page 359 and 360: The femoral shaft is smooth, lackin
- Page 361 and 362: lacking a lateral extension of its
- Page 363 and 364: The anteromedial side of the tibial
- Page 365: fibular notch and the strong crest
- Page 369 and 370: could even be described as having t
- Page 371 and 372: Function.—The functional features
- Page 373 and 374: flexor fibularis groove surface. Ex
- Page 375 and 376: tubercle, which is centrally locate
- Page 377 and 378: Cuboid Description.—The right cub
- Page 379 and 380: Ectocuneiform Description.—A left
- Page 381 and 382: Metatarsals Hallucal metatarsal des
- Page 383 and 384: articulation with the entocuneiform
- Page 385 and 386: medial side facet on MT IV from a v
- Page 387 and 388: Vertebral column Vertebral column d
- Page 389 and 390: measurements, see caption of Fig. 4
- Page 391 and 392: transverse processes, and the poste
- Page 393 and 394: taxa appear to have slightly more p
- Page 395 and 396: dorsoventrally than craniocaudally.
- Page 397 and 398: The zygapophyses increase in size b
- Page 399 and 400: vertebrae. It is also similar to th
- Page 401 and 402: identifications have been reversed.
- Page 403 and 404: preserved. The ribs are slender and
- Page 405 and 406: Carpolestes simpsoni (UM 101963) an
- Page 407 and 408: third metacarpal, similar to arbore
- Page 409 and 410: autapomorphy, because it appears th
- Page 411 and 412: Jenkins (1974) found that Tupaia gl
- Page 413 and 414: Nannodectes and other plesiadapids,
- Page 415 and 416: are consistent with more frequent u
to the peroneal surface. The peroneal surface is slightly concave at the proximal end, but<br />
becomes convex farther distally. The posteromedial surface is marked by a sharp,<br />
posteromedially projecting crest that separates this surface into anterior and posterior<br />
regions of roughly equal anteroposterior dimensions. The surface posterolateral to this<br />
crest is that typically referred to as the posterior, or “flexor surface,” whereas the more<br />
anteromedial one is that referred to as the medial or “tibialis posterior surface ” (Stern,<br />
1988). Followed distally, the crest separates these two surfaces arcs anteriorly,<br />
converging on another crest, the interosseous crest, which has its proximal origin from<br />
the medial lip of the “anterior” surface.<br />
Function.—A striking feature of the fibula is the blade-like crest projecting<br />
posterolaterally from the proximal end. This crest extends the posterior or “flexor<br />
surface” of the fibula proximally, far beyond its limit in humans, for instance. This crest<br />
would greatly augment the area of origin for both the flexor digitorum fibularis muscle on<br />
the posteromedial side of the crest and the peroneus longus muscle on the opposite side<br />
(anterolateral). Thus, functions associated with these muscles, such as forceful flexion of<br />
the digits and eversion of the foot, may have been enhanced. The rugose tuberosity for<br />
the fibular notch on the medial aspect of the distal end suggests a strong tibiofibular<br />
syndesmosis, and thus limited mobility between the tibia and fibula.<br />
Comparison.—I was unable to locate the only other plesiadapid fibula specimen<br />
available for comparison (a distal end of P. tricuspidens MNHN BR-11-L: Beard, 1989).<br />
Beard only mentions the presence of a distal articular surface for the tibia being present,<br />
and suggests a synovial joint existed, instead of a syndesmosis. Thus either these two<br />
taxa had vastly different distal fibulae, or our interpretations differ markedly.<br />
339