Boyer diss 2009 1046..
Boyer diss 2009 1046.. Boyer diss 2009 1046..
on the astragalus. In anterior view the medial malleolus appears to have a “sharp” tip. This is due to the presence of two prominent depressions on its distomedial surface. Function.—Most features of the tibia suggest against leaping or cursorial locomotion, including the relatively anteroposteriorly shallow tibial plateau, a concave lateral tibial condyle, the absence of a prominent cnemial crest, a proximally situated groove for the patellar tendon, and an ungrooved astragalar articular surface (Boyer and Bloch, 2008). The relative sizes of the tibial and femoral condyles have implications for mobility at the knee (Sargis, 2002b). The ratio between the lengths of the medial femoral and tibial condyles is 0.9 while that between the lateral condyles is 0.75. A lateral tibial condyle that is enlarged and a corresponding lateral femoral condyle that is reduced, compared to one another or the medial condyles, suggests that the capacity of the tibia to axially rotate on the femur was enhanced, with the medial condyle serving as the axis of rotation, and translation occurring between the lateral condyles. On the femur, the relatively large pit for the popliteus tendon may indicate that this muscle had an important role in causing or maintaining a certain degree of medial rotation. The dramatic concavity of the posterior surface of the proximal tibial shaft may indicate a robust tibialis posterior muscle or flexor digitorum tibialis. The former of these muscles is a plantar flexor and invertor, while the latter is typically the most important muscle for flexing the digits during powerful grasping in certain primates (Boyer et al., 2007). The concavity of the lateral surface would have held part of the attachment of tibialis anterior, a dorsiflexor and pedal invertor, but this surface is not unusual in its proportional size or morphology. The distal end of the tibial shaft is notable in the roughened surface of the 336
fibular notch and the strong crest forming the anterior border of the fibular notch. These features suggest a syndesmosis with the fibula and an especially robust anterior tibiofibular ligament. The distal articular surface is notable in its flat articular surface for the astragalus and the convex lateral surface of the medial malleolus. These features suggest that, the astragalus may have been able to pivot medially and laterally on the tibia, with its medial surface sliding around the convex lateral surface of the medial malleolus. This motion would result in abduction and adduction of the foot relative to the tibia. The distomedial pits of the medial malleolus reflect a robust deltoid ligament that attached the tibia to the navicular, astragalus, and calcaneum, thus helping to maintain the integrity and stability of this joint. Comparison.—The tibia is a rare element in the French collections of P. tricuspidens. Why this should be the case is unclear. Regardless, only one specimen is available for comparison from this assemblage (MNHN R 218); it represents only the proximal end but still preserves significant morphology. Both species of Nannodectes, however, preserve tibiae. All specimens are basically similar. Because the Nannodectes specimens also preserve distal femora, the proportions of the femoral and tibial condyles can be compared among them. In N. intermedius the medial condyles are available only. The ratio between its femoral and tibial condyle lengths is 0.89. In N. gidleyi both sets of condyles are present: the medial condyles form a ratio of 0.97, while the lateral ones give 0.82. Thus the pattern is the same as for P. cookei, in suggesting a looser fit between the lateral condyles than the medial ones. However, the slightly “tighter” fit between both medial and lateral condyles of N. gidleyi may suggest a less axially mobile knee joint, and possibly a greater degree of agile pronograde locomotion. An additional difference 337
- Page 313 and 314: clavicle reflects some basic aspect
- Page 315 and 316: Humerus Description.—The right an
- Page 317 and 318: epicondyle actually projects somewh
- Page 319 and 320: cookei is absolutely longer than an
- Page 321 and 322: tuberosity. This crest probably del
- Page 323 and 324: olecranon process to estimate its t
- Page 325 and 326: distinct, convex distal radial face
- Page 327 and 328: of the midcarpal joint), and its pr
- Page 329 and 330: (there is no evidence for more than
- Page 331 and 332: matches the opposing facet on the t
- Page 333 and 334: mobility at the trapezoid-trapezium
- Page 335 and 336: Function.—The three proximal carp
- Page 337 and 338: the bone presently being described:
- Page 339 and 340: the “set 2” MC II is a larger,
- Page 341 and 342: differs from MC II and III in havin
- Page 343 and 344: even more pronounced. The distal en
- Page 345 and 346: etween the distal carpals and the
- Page 347 and 348: have stouter shaft diameters for th
- Page 349 and 350: difference makes them more like kno
- Page 351 and 352: antipronograde clinging postures, o
- Page 353 and 354: foramina, and faces slightly proxim
- Page 355 and 356: spine at the superior tip of the il
- Page 357 and 358: the thigh (Gambaryan, 1974). The ha
- Page 359 and 360: The femoral shaft is smooth, lackin
- Page 361 and 362: lacking a lateral extension of its
- Page 363: The anteromedial side of the tibial
- Page 367 and 368: to the peroneal surface. The perone
- Page 369 and 370: could even be described as having t
- Page 371 and 372: Function.—The functional features
- Page 373 and 374: flexor fibularis groove surface. Ex
- Page 375 and 376: tubercle, which is centrally locate
- Page 377 and 378: Cuboid Description.—The right cub
- Page 379 and 380: Ectocuneiform Description.—A left
- Page 381 and 382: Metatarsals Hallucal metatarsal des
- Page 383 and 384: articulation with the entocuneiform
- Page 385 and 386: medial side facet on MT IV from a v
- Page 387 and 388: Vertebral column Vertebral column d
- Page 389 and 390: measurements, see caption of Fig. 4
- Page 391 and 392: transverse processes, and the poste
- Page 393 and 394: taxa appear to have slightly more p
- Page 395 and 396: dorsoventrally than craniocaudally.
- Page 397 and 398: The zygapophyses increase in size b
- Page 399 and 400: vertebrae. It is also similar to th
- Page 401 and 402: identifications have been reversed.
- Page 403 and 404: preserved. The ribs are slender and
- Page 405 and 406: Carpolestes simpsoni (UM 101963) an
- Page 407 and 408: third metacarpal, similar to arbore
- Page 409 and 410: autapomorphy, because it appears th
- Page 411 and 412: Jenkins (1974) found that Tupaia gl
- Page 413 and 414: Nannodectes and other plesiadapids,
on the astragalus. In anterior view the medial malleolus appears to have a “sharp” tip.<br />
This is due to the presence of two prominent depressions on its distomedial surface.<br />
Function.—Most features of the tibia suggest against leaping or cursorial<br />
locomotion, including the relatively anteroposteriorly shallow tibial plateau, a concave<br />
lateral tibial condyle, the absence of a prominent cnemial crest, a proximally situated<br />
groove for the patellar tendon, and an ungrooved astragalar articular surface (<strong>Boyer</strong> and<br />
Bloch, 2008).<br />
The relative sizes of the tibial and femoral condyles have implications for<br />
mobility at the knee (Sargis, 2002b). The ratio between the lengths of the medial femoral<br />
and tibial condyles is 0.9 while that between the lateral condyles is 0.75. A lateral tibial<br />
condyle that is enlarged and a corresponding lateral femoral condyle that is reduced,<br />
compared to one another or the medial condyles, suggests that the capacity of the tibia to<br />
axially rotate on the femur was enhanced, with the medial condyle serving as the axis of<br />
rotation, and translation occurring between the lateral condyles. On the femur, the<br />
relatively large pit for the popliteus tendon may indicate that this muscle had an<br />
important role in causing or maintaining a certain degree of medial rotation. The<br />
dramatic concavity of the posterior surface of the proximal tibial shaft may indicate a<br />
robust tibialis posterior muscle or flexor digitorum tibialis. The former of these muscles<br />
is a plantar flexor and invertor, while the latter is typically the most important muscle for<br />
flexing the digits during powerful grasping in certain primates (<strong>Boyer</strong> et al., 2007). The<br />
concavity of the lateral surface would have held part of the attachment of tibialis anterior,<br />
a dorsiflexor and pedal invertor, but this surface is not unusual in its proportional size or<br />
morphology. The distal end of the tibial shaft is notable in the roughened surface of the<br />
336