Boyer diss 2009 1046..
Boyer diss 2009 1046.. Boyer diss 2009 1046..
that between the “set 1” MC III and “set 1” MC V metacarpals of UM 87990 (1.27), than between the “set 2” MC III and the “set 1” MC V (1.47). The ratio between the two bones in N. intermedius USNM 442229 is slightly higher than that for P. tricuspidens (1.39). Secondly, the shape of the metacarpal heads differs between MC III’s of “set 1” and “set 2” (Table 4.10, Fig. 4.18). The heads are relatively shallower in the dorsoventral direction in the “set 1” morph. This is also a similarity to P. tricuspidens from Berru. If the attribution of the “set 1” MC III to P. cookei is accepted, then MC IV from set 1 must also belong due to the similar sizes and the good fit between the corresponding articular surfaces of the two bones. Likewise, a good fit between MC II, III, and IV of “set 2” suggest that they are all from the same animal, which was not P. cookei (Fig. 4.15). MC II of “set 1” can be attributed to P. cookei on the basis of its small size compared to MC II of “set 2”, and the shape of its head. Another point supporting the attribution of MC II, III, and V “set 1” metacarpals to P. cookei is the fact that they are more robust than the corresponding “set 2” metacarpals (see “SSV” of Table 4.10 – a larger value indicates a more gracile element). This greater robusticity of the “set 1” metacarpals makes them similar to those of P.tricuspidens and P. n. sp. from France. On the other hand the gracility of the “set 2” metacarpals III and V makes them similar to those of N. intermedius and N. gidleyi. However, this cannot be taken as evidence that the “set 2” metacarpals belonged to P. cookei, because MC I of N. intermedius is more gracile than MC I’s of P. cookei and P. n. sp. Therefore, it is expected that the lateral metacarpals of N. intermedius should also be more gracile than those of P. cookei, not equally gracile. Finally, comparing the surface areas of the distal carpal surfaces to those of the proximal articular surfaces of the metacarpals reveals that there is a much better correspondence 316
etween the distal carpals and the “set 1” metacarpals than between the distal carpals and the “set 2” metacarpals (Table 4.12). Metacarpus function.—The wedge-shaped proximal ends of MC II-IV articulate to produce a pronounced transverse metacarpal arch (Fig. 4.15B). Napier (1961) explained that this gives the hands the capacity for convergence (i.e., when the proximal interphalangeal joints flex, the finger tips converge on each other), which enhances grasping ability. The extensive dorsally-facing part of the distal articular surfaces indicates the capacity for stabile “hyper-dorsiflexed” finger postures as are used in pronograde and orthograde quadrupedal locomotion (Jenkins, 1974). Proximal phalanges Proximal phalanx of first digit description.—Three elements referable to this bone are preserved. These include proximal bases of what appear to be both hallucal proximal phalanges (Fig. 4.19), and a third fragmentary base and shaft of the left pollical proximal phalanx. The elements are too fragmentary for meaningful quantification of their morphology, although a few measurements are given in Table 4.13. The bones are recognizable as such by comparison to previously identified first digit proximal phalanges of P. tricuspidens and N. intermedius (Beard, 1989). Hallucal and pollical elements are distinguished here for the first time based on the much larger size of the hallucal elements. The proximal end of this bone is distinct among the proximal phalanx sample in the asymmetry of tubercles that laterally flank and extend ventral to the proximal articular surface. The medial side tubercle is blunt and proximally restricted, while the lateral side tubercle is pointed and proximally extended beyond its partner (Fig. 317
- Page 293 and 294: that it may not even be an archonta
- Page 295 and 296: unstudied material. Specifically, h
- Page 297 and 298: 5321), some metapodials (MNHN R 529
- Page 299 and 300: Gingerich and Gunnell (1992) publis
- Page 301 and 302: prehensility they provide, is an in
- Page 303 and 304: euarchontans (Fig. 1.1). Their anal
- Page 305 and 306: for comparison. These include isola
- Page 307 and 308: plesiadapid samples have the same m
- Page 309 and 310: Organization of results Each bone i
- Page 311 and 312: Bloch and Boyer (2002) and N. inter
- Page 313 and 314: clavicle reflects some basic aspect
- Page 315 and 316: Humerus Description.—The right an
- Page 317 and 318: epicondyle actually projects somewh
- Page 319 and 320: cookei is absolutely longer than an
- Page 321 and 322: tuberosity. This crest probably del
- Page 323 and 324: olecranon process to estimate its t
- Page 325 and 326: distinct, convex distal radial face
- Page 327 and 328: of the midcarpal joint), and its pr
- Page 329 and 330: (there is no evidence for more than
- Page 331 and 332: matches the opposing facet on the t
- Page 333 and 334: mobility at the trapezoid-trapezium
- Page 335 and 336: Function.—The three proximal carp
- Page 337 and 338: the bone presently being described:
- Page 339 and 340: the “set 2” MC II is a larger,
- Page 341 and 342: differs from MC II and III in havin
- Page 343: even more pronounced. The distal en
- Page 347 and 348: have stouter shaft diameters for th
- Page 349 and 350: difference makes them more like kno
- Page 351 and 352: antipronograde clinging postures, o
- Page 353 and 354: foramina, and faces slightly proxim
- Page 355 and 356: spine at the superior tip of the il
- Page 357 and 358: the thigh (Gambaryan, 1974). The ha
- Page 359 and 360: The femoral shaft is smooth, lackin
- Page 361 and 362: lacking a lateral extension of its
- Page 363 and 364: The anteromedial side of the tibial
- Page 365 and 366: fibular notch and the strong crest
- Page 367 and 368: to the peroneal surface. The perone
- Page 369 and 370: could even be described as having t
- Page 371 and 372: Function.—The functional features
- Page 373 and 374: flexor fibularis groove surface. Ex
- Page 375 and 376: tubercle, which is centrally locate
- Page 377 and 378: Cuboid Description.—The right cub
- Page 379 and 380: Ectocuneiform Description.—A left
- Page 381 and 382: Metatarsals Hallucal metatarsal des
- Page 383 and 384: articulation with the entocuneiform
- Page 385 and 386: medial side facet on MT IV from a v
- Page 387 and 388: Vertebral column Vertebral column d
- Page 389 and 390: measurements, see caption of Fig. 4
- Page 391 and 392: transverse processes, and the poste
- Page 393 and 394: taxa appear to have slightly more p
etween the distal carpals and the “set 1” metacarpals than between the distal carpals and<br />
the “set 2” metacarpals (Table 4.12).<br />
Metacarpus function.—The wedge-shaped proximal ends of MC II-IV articulate<br />
to produce a pronounced transverse metacarpal arch (Fig. 4.15B). Napier (1961)<br />
explained that this gives the hands the capacity for convergence (i.e., when the proximal<br />
interphalangeal joints flex, the finger tips converge on each other), which enhances<br />
grasping ability. The extensive dorsally-facing part of the distal articular surfaces<br />
indicates the capacity for stabile “hyper-dorsiflexed” finger postures as are used in<br />
pronograde and orthograde quadrupedal locomotion (Jenkins, 1974).<br />
Proximal phalanges<br />
Proximal phalanx of first digit description.—Three elements referable to this<br />
bone are preserved. These include proximal bases of what appear to be both hallucal<br />
proximal phalanges (Fig. 4.19), and a third fragmentary base and shaft of the left pollical<br />
proximal phalanx. The elements are too fragmentary for meaningful quantification of<br />
their morphology, although a few measurements are given in Table 4.13. The bones are<br />
recognizable as such by comparison to previously identified first digit proximal<br />
phalanges of P. tricuspidens and N. intermedius (Beard, 1989). Hallucal and pollical<br />
elements are distinguished here for the first time based on the much larger size of the<br />
hallucal elements. The proximal end of this bone is distinct among the proximal phalanx<br />
sample in the asymmetry of tubercles that laterally flank and extend ventral to the<br />
proximal articular surface. The medial side tubercle is blunt and proximally restricted,<br />
while the lateral side tubercle is pointed and proximally extended beyond its partner (Fig.<br />
317