Boyer diss 2009 1046..

Boyer diss 2009 1046.. Boyer diss 2009 1046..

pages.nycep.org
from pages.nycep.org More from this publisher
01.09.2014 Views

that between the “set 1” MC III and “set 1” MC V metacarpals of UM 87990 (1.27), than between the “set 2” MC III and the “set 1” MC V (1.47). The ratio between the two bones in N. intermedius USNM 442229 is slightly higher than that for P. tricuspidens (1.39). Secondly, the shape of the metacarpal heads differs between MC III’s of “set 1” and “set 2” (Table 4.10, Fig. 4.18). The heads are relatively shallower in the dorsoventral direction in the “set 1” morph. This is also a similarity to P. tricuspidens from Berru. If the attribution of the “set 1” MC III to P. cookei is accepted, then MC IV from set 1 must also belong due to the similar sizes and the good fit between the corresponding articular surfaces of the two bones. Likewise, a good fit between MC II, III, and IV of “set 2” suggest that they are all from the same animal, which was not P. cookei (Fig. 4.15). MC II of “set 1” can be attributed to P. cookei on the basis of its small size compared to MC II of “set 2”, and the shape of its head. Another point supporting the attribution of MC II, III, and V “set 1” metacarpals to P. cookei is the fact that they are more robust than the corresponding “set 2” metacarpals (see “SSV” of Table 4.10 – a larger value indicates a more gracile element). This greater robusticity of the “set 1” metacarpals makes them similar to those of P.tricuspidens and P. n. sp. from France. On the other hand the gracility of the “set 2” metacarpals III and V makes them similar to those of N. intermedius and N. gidleyi. However, this cannot be taken as evidence that the “set 2” metacarpals belonged to P. cookei, because MC I of N. intermedius is more gracile than MC I’s of P. cookei and P. n. sp. Therefore, it is expected that the lateral metacarpals of N. intermedius should also be more gracile than those of P. cookei, not equally gracile. Finally, comparing the surface areas of the distal carpal surfaces to those of the proximal articular surfaces of the metacarpals reveals that there is a much better correspondence 316

etween the distal carpals and the “set 1” metacarpals than between the distal carpals and the “set 2” metacarpals (Table 4.12). Metacarpus function.—The wedge-shaped proximal ends of MC II-IV articulate to produce a pronounced transverse metacarpal arch (Fig. 4.15B). Napier (1961) explained that this gives the hands the capacity for convergence (i.e., when the proximal interphalangeal joints flex, the finger tips converge on each other), which enhances grasping ability. The extensive dorsally-facing part of the distal articular surfaces indicates the capacity for stabile “hyper-dorsiflexed” finger postures as are used in pronograde and orthograde quadrupedal locomotion (Jenkins, 1974). Proximal phalanges Proximal phalanx of first digit description.—Three elements referable to this bone are preserved. These include proximal bases of what appear to be both hallucal proximal phalanges (Fig. 4.19), and a third fragmentary base and shaft of the left pollical proximal phalanx. The elements are too fragmentary for meaningful quantification of their morphology, although a few measurements are given in Table 4.13. The bones are recognizable as such by comparison to previously identified first digit proximal phalanges of P. tricuspidens and N. intermedius (Beard, 1989). Hallucal and pollical elements are distinguished here for the first time based on the much larger size of the hallucal elements. The proximal end of this bone is distinct among the proximal phalanx sample in the asymmetry of tubercles that laterally flank and extend ventral to the proximal articular surface. The medial side tubercle is blunt and proximally restricted, while the lateral side tubercle is pointed and proximally extended beyond its partner (Fig. 317

etween the distal carpals and the “set 1” metacarpals than between the distal carpals and<br />

the “set 2” metacarpals (Table 4.12).<br />

Metacarpus function.—The wedge-shaped proximal ends of MC II-IV articulate<br />

to produce a pronounced transverse metacarpal arch (Fig. 4.15B). Napier (1961)<br />

explained that this gives the hands the capacity for convergence (i.e., when the proximal<br />

interphalangeal joints flex, the finger tips converge on each other), which enhances<br />

grasping ability. The extensive dorsally-facing part of the distal articular surfaces<br />

indicates the capacity for stabile “hyper-dorsiflexed” finger postures as are used in<br />

pronograde and orthograde quadrupedal locomotion (Jenkins, 1974).<br />

Proximal phalanges<br />

Proximal phalanx of first digit description.—Three elements referable to this<br />

bone are preserved. These include proximal bases of what appear to be both hallucal<br />

proximal phalanges (Fig. 4.19), and a third fragmentary base and shaft of the left pollical<br />

proximal phalanx. The elements are too fragmentary for meaningful quantification of<br />

their morphology, although a few measurements are given in Table 4.13. The bones are<br />

recognizable as such by comparison to previously identified first digit proximal<br />

phalanges of P. tricuspidens and N. intermedius (Beard, 1989). Hallucal and pollical<br />

elements are distinguished here for the first time based on the much larger size of the<br />

hallucal elements. The proximal end of this bone is distinct among the proximal phalanx<br />

sample in the asymmetry of tubercles that laterally flank and extend ventral to the<br />

proximal articular surface. The medial side tubercle is blunt and proximally restricted,<br />

while the lateral side tubercle is pointed and proximally extended beyond its partner (Fig.<br />

317

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!