Boyer diss 2009 1046..
Boyer diss 2009 1046.. Boyer diss 2009 1046..
INTRODUCTION Among North American plesiadapids, one of the latest occurring and largest species is Plesiadapis cookei (Jepsen, 1930; Gingerich, 1976). The only known skull of P. cookei was discovered with an associated skeleton in late Paleocene strata of the Clarks Fork Basin in 1987 (Gunnell and Gingerich, 1987; Gingerich and Gunnell, 1992, 2005; Bloch and Silcox, 2001). The specimen has not yet received a thorough description or analysis despite the fact that the skull is arguably the most complete known for a North American plesiadapid. In some respects this new skull is even better preserved than the nearly complete skulls of P. tricuspidens, an apparently slightly smaller species (e.g., Fleagle, 1999) from the Paris Basin in France (Russell, 1964; Gingerich, 1976). In light of its large body size, one might expect P. cookei to be evolutionarily derived in many respects compared to basal members of Plesiadapidae, which appear to be much smaller. However, the skull of P. cookei may still retain features that were present in the ancestral plesiadapid. Thus, a thorough understanding of the morphology of P. cookei is relevant to further assessing predictions generated by cladistic hypotheses that postulate plesiadapids as a sister group to carpolestids and as a close relative of anatomically modern primates (= Euprimates: Hoffstetter, 1977) (Bloch and Silcox, 2006; Bloch et al., 2007). Another reason to study P. cookei relates to inferred environmental and ecological changes that bracket its existence in North America (e.g., Zachos et al., 2001). Understanding how this taxon differs morphologically from earlier (North American) and later (European) plesiadapids may reveal the nature of ecological differences among 178
these species. Changing ecological niches among plesiadapids through the late Paleocene are likely to track environmental changes experienced by these animals during this time period (Gingerich, 1976). Gingerich (1976) argued that one of the most dramatic ecological/evolutionary transitions documented for plesiadapids occurred in a lineage leading from P. tricuspidens to Platychoerops russelli to Platychoerops daubrei. In this hypothesized lineage, the molar and incisor teeth exhibit a morphocline from bunodont and complex (respectively) in P. tricuspidens to selenodont and simple in Pl. daubrei. Gingerich (1976) suggested that this morphocline reflects an ecological/evolutionary transition from a generalized diet to a highly folivorous diet. Gingerich (1976) also stated that P. cookei is dentally very similar to Pl. russelli. If P. cookei and Pl. russelli share a close phylogenetic relationship, their dental similarities may represent a commonly inherited trait, or one may have inherited its morphology more or less directly from the other. In the latter scenario, P. cookei could be a member of the P. tricuspidens-Pl. russelli-Pl. daubrei lineage and may represent a point on the morphocline described above. Alternatively, P. cookei and Pl. russelli may have each evolved separately from more bunodont forms like P. tricuspidens in response to similar ecological perturbations (e.g., changes in available food resources due to climate change). Either way the cranium and additional detailed aspects of the dentition of P. cookei might be expected to differ from those of P. tricuspidens in ways suggesting a more folivorous diet. 179
- Page 155 and 156: Figure 2.11. USNM 309902 Nannodecte
- Page 157 and 158: Figure 2.13. USNM 309902 Nannodecte
- Page 159 and 160: Figure 2.15. AMNH 17388 Nannodectes
- Page 161 and 162: Figure 2.16. AMNH 17388 Nannodectes
- Page 163 and 164: Figure 2.18. MNHN CR 125 Plesiadapi
- Page 165 and 166: Figure 2.20. MNHN CR 125 Plesiadapi
- Page 167 and 168: Figure 2.22. MNHN CR 965, Plesiadap
- Page 169 and 170: Figure 2.23. MNHN CR 965 Plesiadapi
- Page 171 and 172: Figure 2.24. MNHN CR 965 Plesiadapi
- Page 173 and 174: Figure 2.25. MNHN CR 965, Plesiadap
- Page 175 and 176: Figure 2.26. Pellouin skull Plesiad
- Page 177 and 178: Figure 2.27. Pellouin skull Plesiad
- Page 179 and 180: Figure 2.28. Pellouin skull Plesiad
- Page 181 and 182: Figure 2.29. Pellouin skull Plesiad
- Page 183 and 184: Figure 2.30. MaPhQ 33y Adapis paris
- Page 185 and 186: Figure 2.31. MNHN CR 126, Plesiadap
- Page 187 and 188: Figure 2.32. SBU MRd-12 Sciurus car
- Page 189 and 190: Figure 2.33. UMMZ 58983 Tupaia glis
- Page 191 and 192: Figure 2.34. Boyer coll. Marmota mo
- Page 193 and 194: Figure 2.35. UMMZ TS13 Lagostomus m
- Page 195 and 196: Figure 2.36. AMNH 41527 Lagostomus
- Page 197 and 198: Figure 2.37. AMNH 185638 Indri indr
- Page 199 and 200: Figure 2.38. USNM 482353 Ignacius c
- Page 201 and 202: Figure 2.39. UM 108207 Acidomomys h
- Page 203 and 204: Figure 2.40. Reconstruction of ples
- Page 205: CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF THE FIRST
- Page 209 and 210: Institutional abbreviations AMNH, A
- Page 211 and 212: Methods of examination and document
- Page 213 and 214: SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY Class MAMMA
- Page 215 and 216: Premaxilla and premaxillary dentiti
- Page 217 and 218: nerve and vessels in life (Fig. 3.5
- Page 219 and 220: identifiable. No ethmoid foramina c
- Page 221 and 222: process is quite large, projecting
- Page 223 and 224: vestibuli. This groove’s point of
- Page 225 and 226: 9: 40). The right side reveals an a
- Page 227 and 228: e seen as a wedge-shaped, rugose de
- Page 229 and 230: process appears as solid bone. Admi
- Page 231 and 232: 16) for P. tricuspidens and Rose (1
- Page 233 and 234: DENTAL FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY OF P.
- Page 235 and 236: Lower premolar molarization As indi
- Page 237 and 238: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION The skull of
- Page 239 and 240: REFERENCES Bloch, J.I., Boyer, D.M.
- Page 241 and 242: TABLES Table 3.1. List of anatomica
- Page 243 and 244: Table 3.2. Anatomical abbreviations
- Page 245 and 246: Table 3.3. Size comparison among pl
- Page 247 and 248: Table 3.4 continued. European plesi
- Page 249 and 250: Figure 3.1. Cranium of Plesiadapis
- Page 251 and 252: Figure 3.3. Right maxillary teeth (
- Page 253 and 254: Figure 3.4. Cranium of Plesiadapis
- Page 255 and 256: Figure 3.5. Cranium of Plesiadapis
INTRODUCTION<br />
Among North American plesiadapids, one of the latest occurring and largest<br />
species is Plesiadapis cookei (Jepsen, 1930; Gingerich, 1976). The only known skull of<br />
P. cookei was discovered with an associated skeleton in late Paleocene strata of the<br />
Clarks Fork Basin in 1987 (Gunnell and Gingerich, 1987; Gingerich and Gunnell, 1992,<br />
2005; Bloch and Silcox, 2001). The specimen has not yet received a thorough description<br />
or analysis despite the fact that the skull is arguably the most complete known for a North<br />
American plesiadapid. In some respects this new skull is even better preserved than the<br />
nearly complete skulls of P. tricuspidens, an apparently slightly smaller species (e.g.,<br />
Fleagle, 1999) from the Paris Basin in France (Russell, 1964; Gingerich, 1976).<br />
In light of its large body size, one might expect P. cookei to be evolutionarily<br />
derived in many respects compared to basal members of Plesiadapidae, which appear to<br />
be much smaller. However, the skull of P. cookei may still retain features that were<br />
present in the ancestral plesiadapid. Thus, a thorough understanding of the morphology<br />
of P. cookei is relevant to further assessing predictions generated by cladistic hypotheses<br />
that postulate plesiadapids as a sister group to carpolestids and as a close relative of<br />
anatomically modern primates (= Euprimates: Hoffstetter, 1977) (Bloch and Silcox,<br />
2006; Bloch et al., 2007).<br />
Another reason to study P. cookei relates to inferred environmental and ecological<br />
changes that bracket its existence in North America (e.g., Zachos et al., 2001).<br />
Understanding how this taxon differs morphologically from earlier (North American) and<br />
later (European) plesiadapids may reveal the nature of ecological differences among<br />
178