31.08.2014 Views

Management of tree cover in coffee-based agroforestry ... - Cirad

Management of tree cover in coffee-based agroforestry ... - Cirad

Management of tree cover in coffee-based agroforestry ... - Cirad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Management</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee-<strong>based</strong><br />

agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />

systems <strong>of</strong> the Kavery<br />

watershed<br />

ComMod approach for <strong>in</strong>tegrated renewable<br />

resources management<br />

Jérémy Vendé & Claude Garcia<br />

Msc Forest, Nature and Society


Context<br />

• Advanced MSc Forest and Nature for Society<br />

– AgroParisTech ENGREF<br />

• 6 month pr<strong>of</strong>essional tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

• UPR Ressources Forestières et Politiques<br />

Publiques – GREEN, CIRAD


Study Area<br />

Western Ghats, Kodagu district, Karnataka state, India<br />

75°25’-76°14’E, 12°15’- 12°45’N


Kavery watershed<br />

• Altitud<strong>in</strong>al gradient (100 to 1745 m)<br />

• Hydrological gradient (800 to 5000 mm/an)<br />

• Temperature gradient (10.3 to 35°C)


Kodagu district<br />

• Hotspot (Myers, 1988)<br />

•Tropical Forest and C<strong>of</strong>fee Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />

Systems (CAFS)<br />

• Complex Hydrological Cycles<br />

• Specific Public Policies and rights<br />

• History and strong cultural identity


CAFS<br />

• Shade required (means <strong>tree</strong>s)<br />

• Crop association (Pepper, Cardamom, etc…)<br />

• Stock <strong>of</strong> timber<br />

• Tree rights ownership (Redeemed vs<br />

Unredeemed)


Institutional Context<br />

CAFNET and POPULAR projects<br />

Ecological, Socio-Economical, Anthropological,<br />

Institutional, Political data


Questions to be adressed<br />

• CAFS with high biodiversity<br />

• Kavery watershed<br />

• Ecological transitions on-go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Strong social components<br />

• Complex system <strong>in</strong> evolution<br />

• PES, Carbon sequestration?


Social and Ecological Systems<br />

• Complex systems<br />

• Multiple stakeholders<br />

• Conflict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terests<br />

• Dynamic processes<br />

• Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty


What to do ?<br />

(Careful, this is h<strong>in</strong>dglish !!)


ComMod: Objectives<br />

1 rst : to improve knowledge / understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Through Model<strong>in</strong>g<br />

2 nd : to support collective decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

processes<br />

Integrated <strong>Management</strong> <strong>of</strong> Renewable Resources


ComMod: PARDI<br />

• Problem to be addressed<br />

• Actors impact<strong>in</strong>g the resources<br />

• Resources used <strong>in</strong> the system<br />

• Dynamics driv<strong>in</strong>g the system<br />

• Interactions between the entities


(Problem)ARDI<br />

What are the ma<strong>in</strong> problems <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Kavery watershed?


Biodiversity changes<br />

Forest to<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Transition from<br />

native <strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> to<br />

GR


CAFS<br />

• Shade required (means <strong>tree</strong>s)<br />

• Crop association (Pepper, Cardamom, etc…)<br />

• Stock <strong>of</strong> timber<br />

• Tree rights ownership (Redeemed vs<br />

Unredeemed)<br />

• Exotic species<br />

• Fast grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Timber value<br />

Grevillea robusta


Biodiversity changes<br />

Forest to<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Transition from native<br />

<strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> to GR


Biodiversity changes<br />

Forest to<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Transition from native<br />

<strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> to GR<br />

Land tenures<br />

& mgt<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Tree ownership<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />

mgt<br />

Public<br />

policies


Elephants<br />

Conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

sacred forests<br />

Biodiversity changes<br />

Forest to<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Transition from native<br />

<strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> to GR<br />

Land tenures<br />

& mgt<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Tree ownership<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />

mgt<br />

Public<br />

policies


Elephants<br />

Conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

sacred forests<br />

Biodiversity changes<br />

Forest to<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Transition from native<br />

<strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> to GR<br />

Land tenures<br />

& mgt<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Public<br />

policies<br />

Tree ownership<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />

mgt<br />

Jungle wood<br />

regeneration<br />

Jungle wood<br />

Production<br />

Labour<br />

force cost<br />

Timber<br />

smuggl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee market<br />

fluctuation


Elephants<br />

Conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

sacred forests<br />

Biodiversity changes<br />

Forest to<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Transition from native<br />

<strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> to GR<br />

Land tenures<br />

& mgt<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Public<br />

policies<br />

Tree ownership<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />

mgt<br />

Jungle wood<br />

regeneration<br />

Jungle wood<br />

Production<br />

Labour<br />

force cost<br />

Land price<br />

rais<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Timber<br />

smuggl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Livelihood<br />

dvp<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee market<br />

fluctuation<br />

Inequality<br />

economic<br />

repartition


Corruption<br />

Elephants<br />

Conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

sacred forests<br />

Biodiversity changes<br />

Forest to<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Transition from native<br />

<strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> to GR<br />

Identity and<br />

symbolic values<br />

Land tenures<br />

& mgt<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Relation Forest<br />

dpt - stk<br />

Public<br />

policies<br />

Tree ownership<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />

mgt<br />

Jungle wood<br />

regeneration<br />

Jungle wood<br />

Production<br />

Labour<br />

force cost<br />

Intercommunity<br />

relation<br />

Land price<br />

rais<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Timber<br />

smuggl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Livelihood<br />

dvp<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee market<br />

fluctuation<br />

Inequality<br />

economic<br />

repartition


Corruption<br />

Elephants<br />

Conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

sacred forests<br />

Water<br />

quality<br />

Dvp <strong>of</strong><br />

tourism<br />

Biodiversity changes<br />

Forest to<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Transition from native<br />

<strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> to GR<br />

Identity and<br />

symbolic values<br />

Land tenures<br />

& mgt<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Relation Forest<br />

dpt - stk<br />

Public<br />

policies<br />

Tree ownership<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />

mgt<br />

Jungle wood<br />

regeneration<br />

Jungle wood<br />

Production<br />

Labour<br />

force cost<br />

Intercommunity<br />

relation<br />

Land price<br />

rais<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Timber<br />

smuggl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Livelihood<br />

dvp<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee market<br />

fluctuation<br />

Inequality<br />

economic<br />

repartition


Corruption<br />

Elephants<br />

Conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

sacred forests<br />

Water<br />

quality<br />

Dvp <strong>of</strong><br />

tourism<br />

Biodiversity changes<br />

Forest to<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Transition from native<br />

<strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> to GR<br />

Identity and<br />

symbolic values<br />

Land tenures<br />

& mgt<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Relation Forest<br />

dpt - stk<br />

Public<br />

policies<br />

Tree ownership<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />

mgt<br />

Jungle wood<br />

regeneration<br />

Jungle wood<br />

Production<br />

Labour<br />

force cost<br />

Intercommunity<br />

relation<br />

Land price<br />

rais<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Timber<br />

smuggl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Livelihood<br />

dvp<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee market<br />

fluctuation<br />

Inequality<br />

economic<br />

repartition


Corruption<br />

Elephants<br />

Conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

sacred forests<br />

Water<br />

quality<br />

Dvp <strong>of</strong><br />

tourism<br />

Biodiversity changes<br />

Forest to<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Transition from native<br />

<strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> to GR<br />

Identity and<br />

symbolic values<br />

Land tenures<br />

& mgt<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Relation Forest<br />

dpt - stk<br />

Public<br />

policies<br />

Tree ownership<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />

mgt<br />

Jungle wood<br />

regeneration<br />

Jungle wood<br />

Production<br />

Labour<br />

force cost<br />

Intercommunity<br />

relation<br />

Land price<br />

rais<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Timber<br />

smuggl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Livelihood<br />

dvp<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee market<br />

fluctuation<br />

Inequality<br />

economic<br />

repartition


Agr<strong>of</strong>orest<br />

open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Transition from native<br />

<strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> to GR<br />

Tree ownership<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />

mgt<br />

Public<br />

policies


(Problem)ARDI<br />

What is driv<strong>in</strong>g changes <strong>in</strong> the management<br />

practices <strong>of</strong> <strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> <strong>in</strong> c<strong>of</strong>fee-<strong>based</strong> agrosystems<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Kavery watershed?<br />

How do these drivers <strong>in</strong>teract with <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

farmers’ decisions to build the landscape?<br />

What would be the evolution <strong>of</strong> the system?


P(Actor)RDI<br />

Who are the actors whose practices drive<br />

the evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> <strong>in</strong> c<strong>of</strong>fee-<strong>based</strong><br />

agrosystems on the Kavery watershed ?


Trees <strong>in</strong><br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee estates


Workers<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee owner<br />

Trees <strong>in</strong><br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee estates


Workers<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee owner<br />

Forest Dpt<br />

Trees <strong>in</strong><br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee estates<br />

Territorial<br />

division<br />

Nursery<br />

Wildlife<br />

division


Workers<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee owner<br />

Elephants<br />

Forest Dpt<br />

Trees <strong>in</strong><br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee estates<br />

Territorial<br />

division<br />

Nursery<br />

Wildlife<br />

division


Workers<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee owner<br />

Elephants<br />

Forest Dpt<br />

Small growers<br />

asso.<br />

Trees <strong>in</strong><br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee estates<br />

Territorial<br />

division<br />

Nursery<br />

Wildlife<br />

division<br />

Coorg<br />

planters asso.


Workers<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee owner<br />

Elephants<br />

Forest Dpt<br />

Small growers<br />

asso.<br />

Timber asso.<br />

Trees <strong>in</strong><br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee estates<br />

Territorial<br />

division<br />

Nursery<br />

Wildlife<br />

division<br />

Timber Merchants<br />

Coorg<br />

planters asso.


Workers<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee owner<br />

Elephants<br />

Forest Dpt<br />

Small growers<br />

asso.<br />

Timber asso.<br />

Trees <strong>in</strong><br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee estates<br />

Territorial<br />

division<br />

Nursery<br />

Wildlife<br />

division<br />

CWS<br />

Timber Merchants<br />

KMFT<br />

Coorg<br />

planters asso.<br />

Media


Workers<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee owner<br />

Elephants<br />

Forest Dpt<br />

Small growers<br />

asso.<br />

Timber asso.<br />

Trees <strong>in</strong><br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee estates<br />

Territorial<br />

division<br />

Nursery<br />

Wildlife<br />

division<br />

CWS<br />

Timber Merchants<br />

KMFT<br />

Coorg<br />

planters asso.<br />

Media<br />

CAFNET


Workers<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee owner<br />

Elephants<br />

Forest Dpt<br />

Small growers<br />

asso.<br />

Timber asso.<br />

Trees <strong>in</strong><br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee estates<br />

Territorial<br />

division<br />

Nursery<br />

Wildlife<br />

division<br />

CWS<br />

Timber Merchants<br />

KMFT<br />

Coorg<br />

planters asso.<br />

Media<br />

CAFNET<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee Board<br />

MLA<br />

MoEF


Workers<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee owner<br />

Elephants<br />

Forest Dpt<br />

Small growers<br />

asso.<br />

Timber asso.<br />

Trees <strong>in</strong><br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee estates<br />

Territorial<br />

division<br />

Nursery<br />

Wildlife<br />

division<br />

CWS<br />

Timber Merchants<br />

KMFT<br />

Coorg<br />

planters asso.<br />

Media<br />

CAFNET<br />

Env. Certification<br />

bodies<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee Board<br />

MLA<br />

MoEF


C<strong>of</strong>fee owner<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee estates<br />

Timber sector<br />

Logs<br />

Trees <strong>in</strong><br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee estates<br />

Forest Dpt<br />

Territorial division


PA(Ressource)DI<br />

What are the key resources <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> <strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> <strong>in</strong> c<strong>of</strong>fee-<strong>based</strong><br />

agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems <strong>of</strong> the Kavery<br />

watershed ?


PA(Ressource)DI<br />

• Grevillea robusta (Silver oak)<br />

• Jungle wood (other species <strong>in</strong> the c<strong>of</strong>fee plantations<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Dalbergia latifolia – Rosewood)<br />

• C<strong>of</strong>fee (C<strong>of</strong>fea arabica and C<strong>of</strong>fea canephora var<br />

robusta)<br />

• Pepper (Piper nigrum)<br />

• Irrigation facilities<br />

• Chemical <strong>in</strong>puts (Fertilizers, organic compounds)<br />

• Labor force


PAR(Dynamics)I<br />

What are the dynamics that drive the<br />

management decisions on <strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

c<strong>of</strong>fee-<strong>based</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Kavery watershed ?


PAR(Dynamics)I<br />

• Tree lifecycle<br />

• C<strong>of</strong>fee lifecycle<br />

• Pepper lifecycle<br />

• Production, sales, prices <strong>of</strong> c<strong>of</strong>fee/pepper<br />

• Timber exploitation and sales<br />

• Development <strong>of</strong> irrigation<br />

• Utilization <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>puts (chemicals, organics, etc…)<br />

• Labor force allocation


PARD(Interactions)<br />

What are the ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractions between<br />

the actors and the key resources ?


C<strong>of</strong>fee<br />

owner


C<strong>of</strong>fee<br />

owner<br />

cultivates<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

bloc


C<strong>of</strong>fee<br />

owner<br />

cultivates<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

bloc<br />

climbs on<br />

climbs on<br />

grows shade<br />

grows shade<br />

grows<br />

grows


C<strong>of</strong>fee<br />

owner<br />

cultivates<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

bloc<br />

climbs on<br />

climbs on<br />

Market<br />

sell<br />

buy<br />

buy<br />

grows shade<br />

grows shade<br />

grows<br />

grows<br />

sell<br />

Timber<br />

sector


Market sell<br />

buy C<strong>of</strong>fee<br />

buy<br />

owner<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

bloc<br />

<strong>in</strong>stall<br />

Input<br />

sell<br />

Timber<br />

sector<br />

buy<br />

Irrigation<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastucture<br />

hires,<br />

allocated<br />

Labour<br />

manage<br />

shade<br />

manage shade<br />

climbs on<br />

cultivates<br />

fertilize<br />

grows shade<br />

works<br />

irrigates<br />

grows shade<br />

climbs on<br />

grows<br />

grows


Market sell<br />

buy C<strong>of</strong>fee<br />

buy<br />

owner<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

bloc<br />

Input<br />

sell<br />

Timber<br />

sector<br />

Forest Dpt<br />

buy<br />

Irrigation<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastucture<br />

Labour<br />

climbs on<br />

enforce policies<br />

<strong>in</strong>stall<br />

cultivates<br />

climbs on<br />

enforce policies<br />

hires,<br />

allocated<br />

manage<br />

shade<br />

manage shade<br />

fertilize<br />

works<br />

irrigates<br />

grows shade<br />

grows shade<br />

grows<br />

grows


Conceptual Model<br />

Role Play<strong>in</strong>g Game


Jungle Wood<br />

Silver oak<br />

Pepper<br />

Irrigation<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

C<strong>of</strong>fee<br />

Inputs<br />

Tree slot<br />

Labor unit


ComMod: Processes<br />

Real World<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />

abstraction<br />

Transition<br />

Model<br />

conceptualisation<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />

implementation<br />

Conceptual Model<br />

Multi-Agent System<br />

implementation<br />

Agent-Based Model<br />

All the decisions are computer-made<br />

Role-Play<strong>in</strong>g Game<br />

All the decisions are human-made


ComMod: Iterations<br />

ii<br />

Conceptualisation<br />

i<br />

ii<br />

II iii<br />

iv<br />

Field survey<br />

Field survey<br />

Field survey<br />

Field survey<br />

i<br />

Conceptualisation<br />

Role-play<strong>in</strong>g<br />

game I<br />

Role-play<strong>in</strong>g<br />

game II<br />

Role-play<strong>in</strong>g<br />

game III<br />

In the field<br />

Lab<br />

Iterative process with RPG and ABM


RPGs<br />

• 3 sessions with different local stakeholders<br />

• A different management expected<br />

• Different scenarios


RPGs localization<br />

1st RPG<br />

session<br />

2nd<br />

RPG<br />

session<br />

3rd<br />

RPG<br />

session


Other RPGs<br />

2 other sessions :<br />

• Students, teachers <strong>of</strong> the French High School<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pondicherry, Researchers<br />

• C<strong>of</strong>fee Board, CAFNET steer<strong>in</strong>g comity,<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Forestry<br />

Vulgarization, spread<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the awareness,<br />

RPG as a tool for learn<strong>in</strong>g CAFS


RPG<br />

• Confrontation to the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

game<br />

• Explanations on collective and<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual management decisions<br />

• Suggestions <strong>of</strong> modifications for the<br />

next RPG sessions by the players<br />

themselves


Outcomes<br />

• Build shared-scenarios<br />

• Picture <strong>of</strong> the landscape evolution<br />

• Discussion <strong>of</strong> futures public policies<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>tree</strong> ownership<br />

• Discussion <strong>of</strong> PES and Certification<br />

schemes


12 th <strong>of</strong> July 2009<br />

1st Session :<br />

CHERAMBANE


RPG I<br />

• Attempts to bribe FD <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />

• Players remov<strong>in</strong>g natural regeneration <strong>of</strong><br />

jungle wood<br />

• Get rid <strong>of</strong> the Redeemed/Unredeemed<br />

status<br />

• First discussions <strong>of</strong> PES or conservation<br />

<strong>in</strong>centives


5 th <strong>of</strong> August 2009<br />

2nd Session :<br />

FRENCH<br />

INSTITUTE OF<br />

PONDICHERRY


French Institute<br />

Pondicherry<br />

• A successful game with a different<br />

public, and a different aim<br />

• A different set <strong>of</strong> management<br />

practicies<br />

• Discussions to popularize the game,<br />

spread the awareness among c<strong>of</strong>fee<br />

agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems


30 th <strong>of</strong> August 2009<br />

3rd Session :<br />

MADIKERI


RPG II<br />

• Jungle wood better than Silver oak<br />

• A description <strong>of</strong> the different<br />

management compare to RPG 1<br />

• Get rid <strong>of</strong> the labor scarcity<br />

• Discussions <strong>of</strong> scenarios and PES or<br />

conservation <strong>in</strong>centives


17 th <strong>of</strong> August 2009<br />

4th Session :<br />

COFFEE BOARD<br />

(Chetalli)


C<strong>of</strong>fee Board<br />

• An expert and scientific regard on the<br />

management<br />

• Utilization <strong>of</strong> scenarios dur<strong>in</strong>g the game<br />

(C<strong>of</strong>fee market crack, Certification<br />

schemes)<br />

• Discussions <strong>of</strong> best management<br />

practicies, vulgarization


26 th <strong>of</strong> August 2009<br />

5th Session :<br />

VALNOOR


RPG III<br />

• Scenario <strong>of</strong> c<strong>of</strong>fee market crack<br />

• A different management<br />

• Discussions <strong>of</strong> futures public<br />

policies<br />

• Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the future <strong>tree</strong><br />

<strong>cover</strong> <strong>in</strong> Kodagu


Comparison <strong>of</strong> the<br />

RPGs


Comparison<br />

• Different management practicies all<br />

along the Kavery watershed<br />

• Different evolutions on <strong>tree</strong> <strong>cover</strong><br />

• Scenarios<br />

• Arguments to discuss the <strong>tree</strong> rights<br />

ownership


Density <strong>of</strong> <strong>tree</strong>s


% <strong>of</strong> Grevillea Robusta


The End ?<br />

• Participation <strong>of</strong> CAFNET project<br />

and the C<strong>of</strong>fee Board<br />

• Necessity to <strong>in</strong>volve c<strong>of</strong>fee owners,<br />

Associations, Media, MLA, KFD,<br />

Timber sector<br />

• Spread the awareness regard<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

the <strong>tree</strong> rights ownership and the<br />

different scenarios


Observations<br />

• 1 st ComMod approach <strong>in</strong> India<br />

• Efficiency <strong>of</strong> the ComMod approach for<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g complex ecologic and sociodynamics<br />

<strong>in</strong> a short laps <strong>of</strong> time<br />

• Legitimacy <strong>of</strong> the scenarios ? (scientists vs<br />

players)<br />

• New methodological tools and learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

experiences needed?<br />

• Necessity to give limits to the approach


Discussion<br />

• Difficulties to <strong>in</strong>teract with policy makers<br />

• Revelation <strong>of</strong> hidden processes<br />

• Attempts to use to the RPG for other stakes ?<br />

• Before vs After ComMod ?<br />

• Difficulties to clarify the scientist positions<br />

• Legitimacy <strong>of</strong> further recommendations<br />

• ABM ?


Thank you for your attention


CHERAMBANE


Density <strong>of</strong> <strong>tree</strong>s


% <strong>of</strong> Grevillea Robusta


F. I. PONDICHERRY


Density <strong>of</strong> <strong>tree</strong>s


% <strong>of</strong> Grevillea Robusta


MADIKERI


Density <strong>of</strong> <strong>tree</strong>s


% <strong>of</strong> Grevillea Robusta


COFFEE BOARD


Density <strong>of</strong> <strong>tree</strong>s


% <strong>of</strong> Grevillea Robusta


Valnoor


Density <strong>of</strong> <strong>tree</strong>s


% <strong>of</strong> Grevillea Robusta

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!