Time Tested - Straumann ® Soft Tissue Level Implants

Time Tested - Straumann ® Soft Tissue Level Implants Time Tested - Straumann ® Soft Tissue Level Implants

29.08.2014 Views

Fixed denTAL prosthesis using Straumann ® sOft Tissue Level imPLAnt system From a case report by Dr. W. Martin and Prof. J. Ruskin 11 Periapical radiograph 6 weeks after implant placement (Site 21: 4.1 x 12 mm Regular Neck Tapered Effect implant, Site 19: 4.8 x 12 mm Wide Neck Tapered Effect implant) Built-in soft tissue management thanks to machined neck; lateral view 6 weeks after implant placement Easy access at soft tissue level for impression components; impression caps and synOcta ® positioning cylinders in place synOcta ® Abutments Lateral view of the fixed dental prosthesis Courtesy of Quintessence Courtesy of Dr. W. Martin and Prof. J. Ruskin “The Straumann ® Soft Tissue Level imPLAnt has been the imPLAnt of choice in our prACTice for over a deCAde. Its strength, predictability, versATility and ease of use have been key determinants for seleCTing this imPLAnt and have led to reALized clinical suCCess.” Dr. Will Martin, DMD, MS – Clinical Director of the Center for Implant Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

REFERENCES 1 Applicable to simple cases according to the ITI rating and using a solid abutment. 2 Fischer K and Stenberg T. Prospective 10-Year Cohort Study Based on a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) on Implant-Supported Full-Arch Maxillary Prostheses. Part 1: Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implants and Mucosal Tissue. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):808-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00389.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18. 3 Fischer K and Stenberg T. Prospective 10-Year Cohort Study Based on a Randomized, Controlled Trial (RCT) on Implant-Supported Full-Arch Maxillary Prostheses. Part ii: Prosthetic Outcomes and Maintenance. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Aug 11. doi: 10.1111/j.1708- 8208.2011.00383.x.[Epub ahead of print] 4 Norm ASTM F67 (states min. tensile strength of annealed titanium) and data on file 5 Titanium cold worked TiGr4 and Roxolid tensile strength: Data on file. 6 Buser D, et al. 10-Year Survival and Success Rates of 511 Titanium Implants with a Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Surface: A Retrospective Study in 303 Partially Edentulous Patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Mar 30. doi: 10.1111/j.1708- 8208.2012.00456.x. [Epub ahead of print] 7 Cochran DL, et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Apr;13(2):144-53. 8 Roccuzzo M and Wilson T. A prospective study evaluating a protocol for 6 weeks’ loading of SLA implants in the posterior maxilla: one year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Oct;13(5):502-7. 9 Salvi GE, et al. Early loading (2 or 6 weeks) of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) ITI implants in the posterior mandible. A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Apr;15(2):142-9. 10 Oates TW, et al. Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):755-60. 11 ITI Treatment Guide Volume 2, 35-41.

Fixed denTAL prosthesis using <strong>Straumann</strong> <strong>®</strong><br />

sOft <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Level</strong> imPLAnt system<br />

From a case report by Dr. W. Martin and Prof. J. Ruskin 11<br />

Periapical radiograph 6 weeks after<br />

implant placement<br />

(Site 21: 4.1 x 12 mm Regular Neck Tapered Effect<br />

implant, Site 19: 4.8 x 12 mm Wide Neck<br />

Tapered Effect implant)<br />

Built-in soft tissue management<br />

thanks to machined neck; lateral view<br />

6 weeks after implant placement<br />

Easy access at soft tissue level<br />

for impression components;<br />

impression caps and synOcta <strong>®</strong><br />

positioning cylinders in place<br />

synOcta <strong>®</strong> Abutments<br />

Lateral view of the fixed dental<br />

prosthesis<br />

Courtesy of Quintessence<br />

Courtesy of Dr. W. Martin and Prof. J. Ruskin<br />

“The <strong>Straumann</strong> <strong>®</strong> <strong>Soft</strong> <strong>Tissue</strong> <strong>Level</strong> imPLAnt has been the imPLAnt of choice<br />

in our prACTice for over a deCAde. Its strength, predictability, versATility and<br />

ease of use have been key determinants for seleCTing this imPLAnt and have<br />

led to reALized clinical suCCess.”<br />

Dr. Will Martin, DMD, MS – Clinical Director of the Center for<br />

Implant Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!