Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...
Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...
Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program: Administration and Supervision<br />
Outcome and Past <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
<strong>Learning</strong> Outcome 1: As caring professionals, establish relationships with students, faculty, and parents that fosters mutual<br />
respect;<br />
Is this outcome being reexamined? Yes XX No<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> Activity<br />
Outcome<br />
Measures<br />
Explain how<br />
student<br />
learning will<br />
be measured<br />
and indicate<br />
whether it is<br />
direct or<br />
indirect.<br />
Critical<br />
Assignmen<br />
ts for ED<br />
582 and<br />
583(Direct)<br />
<br />
On-site<br />
advisor<br />
Evaluations<br />
(Indirect)<br />
Performance Standard<br />
Define and explain<br />
acceptable level of student<br />
performance.<br />
Critical Assignment Ratings<br />
for ELCC Standards 1 -<br />
School Vision of <strong>Learning</strong>, 4<br />
- Community Involvement, 5<br />
- Ethical and Moral<br />
Professionalism from the<br />
Critical Assignment will be at<br />
an aggregated mean of 3.5 out<br />
of a possible 4<br />
Aggregated ratings from Onsite<br />
Advisors on criteria<br />
statements dealing with<br />
caring professionals, ability to<br />
work with staff, communicate<br />
with faculty, and relate to<br />
Data Collection<br />
Discuss the data collected and student population<br />
Means<br />
for<br />
<strong>Student</strong><br />
s n= 17<br />
ELCC<br />
Standar<br />
d I<br />
ELCC<br />
Standar<br />
d 4<br />
ELCC<br />
Standar<br />
d 5<br />
ED 582 3.52 3.81 3.82<br />
ED 583 3.94 3.85 4.00<br />
On-site advisors ratings for:<br />
caring professionals 3.90<br />
ability to work with 3.94<br />
staff<br />
communicate with 3.58<br />
faculty<br />
Analysis<br />
1) Describe the analysis<br />
process.<br />
2) Present the findings of the<br />
analysis including the numbers<br />
participating and deemed<br />
acceptable.<br />
Of the 17 students who<br />
graduated in 2010, in ED 582,<br />
all were at the aggregated<br />
level for Standards 1, 4 & 5.<br />
ED 583 scored a 4.00 rating in<br />
STD 5<br />
In ED 582, Standard 1, two<br />
students were at an Acceptable<br />
rating.<br />
All 17 students were at the<br />
Aggregate rating in each of the<br />
areas but in the communicating<br />
with faculty criteria two<br />
students rated at an Acceptable<br />
level. .