28.08.2014 Views

Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...

Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...

Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program: Administration and Supervision<br />

Outcome and Past <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

<strong>Learning</strong> Outcome 1: As caring professionals, establish relationships with students, faculty, and parents that fosters mutual<br />

respect;<br />

Is this outcome being reexamined? Yes XX No<br />

<strong>Assessment</strong> Activity<br />

Outcome<br />

Measures<br />

Explain how<br />

student<br />

learning will<br />

be measured<br />

and indicate<br />

whether it is<br />

direct or<br />

indirect.<br />

Critical<br />

Assignmen<br />

ts for ED<br />

582 and<br />

583(Direct)<br />

<br />

On-site<br />

advisor<br />

Evaluations<br />

(Indirect)<br />

Performance Standard<br />

Define and explain<br />

acceptable level of student<br />

performance.<br />

Critical Assignment Ratings<br />

for ELCC Standards 1 -<br />

School Vision of <strong>Learning</strong>, 4<br />

- Community Involvement, 5<br />

- Ethical and Moral<br />

Professionalism from the<br />

Critical Assignment will be at<br />

an aggregated mean of 3.5 out<br />

of a possible 4<br />

Aggregated ratings from Onsite<br />

Advisors on criteria<br />

statements dealing with<br />

caring professionals, ability to<br />

work with staff, communicate<br />

with faculty, and relate to<br />

Data Collection<br />

Discuss the data collected and student population<br />

Means<br />

for<br />

<strong>Student</strong><br />

s n= 17<br />

ELCC<br />

Standar<br />

d I<br />

ELCC<br />

Standar<br />

d 4<br />

ELCC<br />

Standar<br />

d 5<br />

ED 582 3.52 3.81 3.82<br />

ED 583 3.94 3.85 4.00<br />

On-site advisors ratings for:<br />

caring professionals 3.90<br />

ability to work with 3.94<br />

staff<br />

communicate with 3.58<br />

faculty<br />

Analysis<br />

1) Describe the analysis<br />

process.<br />

2) Present the findings of the<br />

analysis including the numbers<br />

participating and deemed<br />

acceptable.<br />

Of the 17 students who<br />

graduated in 2010, in ED 582,<br />

all were at the aggregated<br />

level for Standards 1, 4 & 5.<br />

ED 583 scored a 4.00 rating in<br />

STD 5<br />

In ED 582, Standard 1, two<br />

students were at an Acceptable<br />

rating.<br />

All 17 students were at the<br />

Aggregate rating in each of the<br />

areas but in the communicating<br />

with faculty criteria two<br />

students rated at an Acceptable<br />

level. .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!