Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program: Administration and Supervision practitioner. All students are rated on a scale. Exceeds Expectations ratings are given a numerical score of 4, Meets Expectations ratings are given a score of 3, Developing Towards Expectations ratings are given a score of 2, and Does Not Meet Expectation rating of 1. Describe how the program implemented its planned improvements from last year: Provide a response to last year’s University Assessment Committee review of the program’s learning assessment report: (List each recommendation and provide a specific response to each). No recommendations were given.
Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program: Administration and Supervision Outcome and Past Assessment Learning Outcome 1: As caring professionals, establish relationships with students, faculty, and parents that fosters mutual respect; Is this outcome being reexamined? Yes XX No Assessment Activity Outcome Measures Explain how student learning will be measured and indicate whether it is direct or indirect. Critical Assignmen ts for ED 582 and 583(Direct) On-site advisor Evaluations (Indirect) Performance Standard Define and explain acceptable level of student performance. Critical Assignment Ratings for ELCC Standards 1 - School Vision of Learning, 4 - Community Involvement, 5 - Ethical and Moral Professionalism from the Critical Assignment will be at an aggregated mean of 3.5 out of a possible 4 Aggregated ratings from Onsite Advisors on criteria statements dealing with caring professionals, ability to work with staff, communicate with faculty, and relate to Data Collection Discuss the data collected and student population Means for Student s n= 17 ELCC Standar d I ELCC Standar d 4 ELCC Standar d 5 ED 582 3.52 3.81 3.82 ED 583 3.94 3.85 4.00 On-site advisors ratings for: caring professionals 3.90 ability to work with 3.94 staff communicate with 3.58 faculty Analysis 1) Describe the analysis process. 2) Present the findings of the analysis including the numbers participating and deemed acceptable. Of the 17 students who graduated in 2010, in ED 582, all were at the aggregated level for Standards 1, 4 & 5. ED 583 scored a 4.00 rating in STD 5 In ED 582, Standard 1, two students were at an Acceptable rating. All 17 students were at the Aggregate rating in each of the areas but in the communicating with faculty criteria two students rated at an Acceptable level. .
Page 1 and 2: Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program:
Page 5: Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program:

Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?