Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...
Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...
Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program: Administration and Supervision<br />
Outcome and Past <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
<strong>Learning</strong> Outcome 3: As critical thinkers, demonstrate effective problem solving skills that generate multiple solutions for practical<br />
decision-making that can affect the school, parish, and wider community.<br />
Is this outcome being reexamined? Yes X No<br />
If yes, give a brief summary of previous results (including trends) and any changes made to the program.<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> Activity<br />
Outcome Measures<br />
Explain how student<br />
learning will be<br />
measured and indicate<br />
whether it is direct or<br />
indirect.<br />
Critical Assignments for<br />
ED 587 and 591<br />
(Direct)<br />
On-Site Supervisor<br />
Evaluations (Indirect)<br />
University Supervisor’s<br />
Evaluation<br />
Performance Standard<br />
Define and explain<br />
acceptable level of<br />
student performance.<br />
Aggregated means for<br />
ELCC Standards # 3 0<br />
Managerial Leadership<br />
& 6 Larger School<br />
Context for these<br />
Critical Assignments<br />
will be 3.5 or higher<br />
Aggregated means for<br />
criteria statements<br />
dealing with Legal<br />
Issues will be at 3.0 or<br />
higher for all exiting<br />
candidates.<br />
Aggregated means for<br />
ELCC Standards # 3 &<br />
6 for these Critical<br />
Assignments will be 3.0<br />
Data Collection<br />
Discuss the data collected and student<br />
population<br />
ELCC<br />
Standard<br />
3<br />
ELCC<br />
Standard<br />
6<br />
Means<br />
ED 591 4.00 4.00<br />
ED 587 4.00 4.00<br />
On-Site rating for:<br />
Response to Legal Issues 3.58<br />
Problem Analysis 3.69<br />
Decision Making 3.58<br />
University Supervisor’s rating for:<br />
ELCC Standard #3 3.68<br />
ELCC Standard #6 3.53<br />
Analysis<br />
1) Describe the analysis process.<br />
2) Present the findings of the<br />
analysis including the numbers<br />
participating and deemed<br />
acceptable.<br />
All 17 students exceeded the<br />
Aggregated ratings in each of<br />
these areas.<br />
All 17 students were at an<br />
Aggregated rating in all the three<br />
criteria statements with two<br />
students receiving an Acceptable<br />
scoring<br />
All 17 students met at an<br />
Aggregated rating with two<br />
students meeting at an<br />
Acceptable rating in each of