Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program: Administration and Supervision application of concepts and theories related to finance and development. As a result all students received a score of 4.00 in both of the standards measured. The final Portfolio that students now complete for the CSLP also offers students an opportunity to self-reflect and evaluate their own progress so that they know the areas where they need to put forth more effort to grow and develop. They also learn to recognize their areas of experience or confidence. Discuss planned curricular or program improvements for this year based on assessment of outcome: In general, the On-Site evaluation is one that continues to develop. Because students are full time teachers or principals and do internships in their own schools, it can be difficult to motivate the On-site Advisor to work with the intern in providing a variety of real life-like experiences. The evaluations given by On-site advisors are subjective based on what they have or have not observed. Lack of observation is often due to the fact that the On-site Advisor does not provide the opportunity for a given experience. This is especially true if the candidate is a teacher; whereas those who are principals are engaged in their daily administration of the school under the guidance of their superintendent. The Coordinator of the Catholic School Leadership Program will continue to fine tune the responsibilities of the On-site Advisors and provide suggestions for candidate experiences. Though meeting expected standards, the lowest scores for this Learning Outcome were for the “Coping with stress and communicating with faculty.” This is hard even for most experienced principals, especially in Catholic schools where administrative staff is often quite limited. The students rate themselves on this and acknowledge that they know they need to do more with in these areas. These are the areas where candidates learn by doing. Working with On-site Advisors to give students more experiences where they can take the lead, learn to communicate with faculty, and cope with daily stress levels may help to buld up student confidence in these areas.
Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program: Administration and Supervision Outcome and Past Assessment Learning Outcome 3: As critical thinkers, demonstrate effective problem solving skills that generate multiple solutions for practical decision-making that can affect the school, parish, and wider community. Is this outcome being reexamined? Yes X No If yes, give a brief summary of previous results (including trends) and any changes made to the program. Assessment Activity Outcome Measures Explain how student learning will be measured and indicate whether it is direct or indirect. Critical Assignments for ED 587 and 591 (Direct) On-Site Supervisor Evaluations (Indirect) University Supervisor’s Evaluation Performance Standard Define and explain acceptable level of student performance. Aggregated means for ELCC Standards # 3 0 Managerial Leadership & 6 Larger School Context for these Critical Assignments will be 3.5 or higher Aggregated means for criteria statements dealing with Legal Issues will be at 3.0 or higher for all exiting candidates. Aggregated means for ELCC Standards # 3 & 6 for these Critical Assignments will be 3.0 Data Collection Discuss the data collected and student population ELCC Standard 3 ELCC Standard 6 Means ED 591 4.00 4.00 ED 587 4.00 4.00 On-Site rating for: Response to Legal Issues 3.58 Problem Analysis 3.69 Decision Making 3.58 University Supervisor’s rating for: ELCC Standard #3 3.68 ELCC Standard #6 3.53 Analysis 1) Describe the analysis process. 2) Present the findings of the analysis including the numbers participating and deemed acceptable. All 17 students exceeded the Aggregated ratings in each of these areas. All 17 students were at an Aggregated rating in all the three criteria statements with two students receiving an Acceptable scoring All 17 students met at an Aggregated rating with two students meeting at an Acceptable rating in each of
Page 1 and 2: Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program:
Page 11: Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program:

Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?