Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program: Administration and Supervision Outcome and Past Assessment Learning Outcome 2: As effective practitioners, differentiate curriculum and instruction to accommodate students of all exceptionalities and connect curriculum goals and objectives to diocesan, local, state and national standards;; Is this outcome being reexamined? Yes X No . Assessment Activity Outcome Measures Explain how student learning will be measured and indicate whether it is direct or indirect. Critical Assignments for ED 583 and 591 (Direct) On-site Advisor Evaluation Performance Standard Define and explain acceptable level of student performance. Aggregated means for ELCC Standard s # 2 Knowledge to Promote Student Success, and #6 - The larger Educational Context in these Critical Assignments will be 3.5 out of a possible 4 Aggregated means for criteria statements dealing with Organizational and Task Performance, Ability to Delegate, Initiative and Responsibility, Motivation and Knowledge of Concepts will be at 3.0 or higher Data Collection Discuss the data collected and student population ELCC Standard 2 ELCC Standard 6 ED 583 3.94 3.90 ED 591 4.00 4.00 On-site advisors rating for: Ability to Work with Staff 3.94 Ability to Cope with Stress 3.47 Ability to Communicate with 3.58 Faculty Ability to Relate to Students 3.81 Analysis 1) Describe the analysis process. 2) Present the findings of the analysis including the numbers participating and deemed acceptable. Of the 17 students who graduated in 2010, in ED 583, all students met Aggregated ratings in both the standards. In ED 591, all exceeded the Aggregated rating. All 17 students were at the acceptable level or the Aggrgated rating in each of these areas. Ability to cope criteria showed an Acceptable rating due to the two students who scored at an Acceptable rating.
Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program: Administration and Supervision for all exiting candidates. University Supervisor Evaluation Aggregated means for ELCC Standard s# 2- Knowledge to Promote Student Success , and #6 - The larger Educational Context in these Critical Assignments will be 3. out of a possible 4 University Supervisor’s rating for: ELCC Standard #2 3.63 ELCC Standard #6 3.53 All 17 students were at the Aggrgated rating but again the two students rated at an acceptable level for each of these standards Interpretation of Results Extent this Learning Outcome has been achieved by students (Use both direct and indirect measure results): Aggregated means for ELCC Standard s # 2 Knowledge to Promote Student Success, and #6 - The larger Educational Context in these Critical Assignments was attained by all students. Program strengths and opportunities for improvement relative to assessment of outcome: In ED 583, students are introduced into a wide variety of concepts, theories, and tools of inquiry related to educational leadership and necessary for the effective management of schools. They are required to apply these in solving case studies and to dialog and discuss related experiences as part of their Discussion Board. The Final Project (Critical Assignment) requires them to create a “Game Plan” in which they must highlight significant theories, concepts and methods of inquiry that they will employ in their own effective school management. This Game Plan assignment is outlined at the beginning of the course so that candidates may continue to fine tune it and seek personal improvement throughout the course in these areas. In ED 591, students must utilize the knowledge and concepts of administration and also develop knowledge of concepts, theories and tools of inquiry related to effective managing the budget, creating a five year plan for finances, and creating a strategic plan that includes development. They are required to create a school budget, as well as create a five- year plan as part of the final project (critical assignment). Topics related to effective management, budget, and issues of finance and of development are topics discussed in the Discussion Board. The dialog exchange helps students to sharpen their methods of inquiry and grow in their knowledge and
Page 1 and 2: Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program:
Page 9: Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program:

Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?