28.08.2014 Views

Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...

Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...

Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program: Administration and Supervision<br />

Outcome and Past <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

<strong>Learning</strong> Outcome 2: As effective practitioners, differentiate curriculum and instruction to accommodate students of all<br />

exceptionalities and connect curriculum goals and objectives to diocesan, local, state and national standards;;<br />

Is this outcome being reexamined? Yes X No<br />

.<br />

<strong>Assessment</strong> Activity<br />

Outcome Measures<br />

Explain how student<br />

learning will be<br />

measured and indicate<br />

whether it is direct or<br />

indirect.<br />

Critical Assignments for<br />

ED 583 and 591 (Direct)<br />

On-site Advisor<br />

Evaluation<br />

Performance Standard<br />

Define and explain<br />

acceptable level of<br />

student performance.<br />

Aggregated means for<br />

ELCC Standard s # 2<br />

Knowledge to Promote<br />

<strong>Student</strong> Success, and #6 -<br />

The larger Educational<br />

Context in these Critical<br />

Assignments will be 3.5<br />

out of a possible 4<br />

Aggregated means for<br />

criteria statements<br />

dealing with<br />

Organizational and Task<br />

Performance, Ability to<br />

Delegate, Initiative and<br />

Responsibility,<br />

Motivation and<br />

Knowledge of Concepts<br />

will be at 3.0 or higher<br />

Data Collection<br />

Discuss the data collected and student<br />

population<br />

ELCC<br />

Standard<br />

2<br />

ELCC<br />

Standard<br />

6<br />

ED 583 3.94 3.90<br />

ED 591 4.00 4.00<br />

On-site advisors rating for:<br />

Ability to Work with Staff 3.94<br />

Ability to Cope with Stress 3.47<br />

Ability to Communicate with 3.58<br />

Faculty<br />

Ability to Relate to <strong>Student</strong>s 3.81<br />

Analysis<br />

1) Describe the analysis process.<br />

2) Present the findings of the<br />

analysis including the numbers<br />

participating and deemed<br />

acceptable.<br />

Of the 17 students who graduated in<br />

2010, in ED 583, all students met<br />

Aggregated ratings in both the<br />

standards.<br />

In ED 591, all exceeded the<br />

Aggregated rating.<br />

All 17 students were at the<br />

acceptable level or the Aggrgated<br />

rating in each of these areas. Ability<br />

to cope criteria showed an<br />

Acceptable rating due to the two<br />

students who scored at an<br />

Acceptable rating.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!