Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...
Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...
Student Learning Assessment Report Submitted by: Usha Rajdev ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Academic Year : 2009-2010 Program: Administration and Supervision<br />
Outcome and Past <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
<strong>Learning</strong> Outcome 2: As effective practitioners, differentiate curriculum and instruction to accommodate students of all<br />
exceptionalities and connect curriculum goals and objectives to diocesan, local, state and national standards;;<br />
Is this outcome being reexamined? Yes X No<br />
.<br />
<strong>Assessment</strong> Activity<br />
Outcome Measures<br />
Explain how student<br />
learning will be<br />
measured and indicate<br />
whether it is direct or<br />
indirect.<br />
Critical Assignments for<br />
ED 583 and 591 (Direct)<br />
On-site Advisor<br />
Evaluation<br />
Performance Standard<br />
Define and explain<br />
acceptable level of<br />
student performance.<br />
Aggregated means for<br />
ELCC Standard s # 2<br />
Knowledge to Promote<br />
<strong>Student</strong> Success, and #6 -<br />
The larger Educational<br />
Context in these Critical<br />
Assignments will be 3.5<br />
out of a possible 4<br />
Aggregated means for<br />
criteria statements<br />
dealing with<br />
Organizational and Task<br />
Performance, Ability to<br />
Delegate, Initiative and<br />
Responsibility,<br />
Motivation and<br />
Knowledge of Concepts<br />
will be at 3.0 or higher<br />
Data Collection<br />
Discuss the data collected and student<br />
population<br />
ELCC<br />
Standard<br />
2<br />
ELCC<br />
Standard<br />
6<br />
ED 583 3.94 3.90<br />
ED 591 4.00 4.00<br />
On-site advisors rating for:<br />
Ability to Work with Staff 3.94<br />
Ability to Cope with Stress 3.47<br />
Ability to Communicate with 3.58<br />
Faculty<br />
Ability to Relate to <strong>Student</strong>s 3.81<br />
Analysis<br />
1) Describe the analysis process.<br />
2) Present the findings of the<br />
analysis including the numbers<br />
participating and deemed<br />
acceptable.<br />
Of the 17 students who graduated in<br />
2010, in ED 583, all students met<br />
Aggregated ratings in both the<br />
standards.<br />
In ED 591, all exceeded the<br />
Aggregated rating.<br />
All 17 students were at the<br />
acceptable level or the Aggrgated<br />
rating in each of these areas. Ability<br />
to cope criteria showed an<br />
Acceptable rating due to the two<br />
students who scored at an<br />
Acceptable rating.