the world of private banking
the world of private banking
the world of private banking
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
44<br />
THE WORLD OF PRIVAtE BANKING<br />
Westminster Bank was ‘a big confession that <strong>the</strong> era <strong>of</strong> <strong>private</strong> firms has passed<br />
and that <strong>the</strong> day <strong>of</strong> joint-stock <strong>banking</strong> is fully and finally acknowledged. It is an<br />
avowal that one kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>banking</strong> must give way to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, which is <strong>the</strong> better’. <br />
The prediction did, <strong>of</strong> course, in <strong>the</strong> end materialize, though <strong>the</strong> process greatly<br />
varied, whe<strong>the</strong>r in speed, extent or significance, depending on <strong>the</strong> country, region<br />
or type <strong>of</strong> bank involved. The history <strong>of</strong> <strong>private</strong> banks during <strong>the</strong> onset <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
corporate economy, from around 1870 to 1914, does not fit easily into a simple<br />
‘decline and fall’ framework <strong>of</strong> analysis. It is more complex, and <strong>the</strong>refore more<br />
interesting, raising <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conditions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir survival, <strong>the</strong>ir lasting<br />
economic significance, and <strong>the</strong>ir complex relationships with <strong>the</strong> joint-stock banks.<br />
These questions are examined in this chapter. The main argument is that <strong>the</strong><br />
lasting significance <strong>of</strong> <strong>private</strong> banks can be explained both by <strong>the</strong> competitive<br />
advantage which <strong>the</strong>y enjoyed in some areas, and by <strong>the</strong> economic, political,<br />
and socio-cultural context <strong>of</strong> late-nineteenth-century <strong>banking</strong> development. This<br />
context, however, differed between countries, with <strong>the</strong> competitiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>private</strong><br />
bankers varying accordingly. The comparative approach adopted here attempts to<br />
account for <strong>the</strong>se differences. The chapter is divided into five parts. After a brief<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> <strong>private</strong> banks, <strong>the</strong> <strong>world</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> haute banque is analysed in some<br />
detail, followed by a shorter discussion <strong>of</strong> provincial <strong>private</strong> banks. A fourth part<br />
considers <strong>the</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>private</strong> bankers to <strong>banking</strong> development, and some<br />
conclusions are proposed in a fifth and final part.<br />
What is a Private Bank?<br />
For <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this study, <strong>private</strong> banks have been defined in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
ownership ra<strong>the</strong>r than activity. In <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century and during most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
twentieth century, a bank was considered as a <strong>private</strong> bank if its owners were<br />
also its managers. Such banks were usually family firms. Their legal form was<br />
generally that <strong>of</strong> partnerships, or a general partnership, with partners having<br />
unlimited responsibility; but <strong>the</strong>re were also <strong>private</strong> limited companies and even<br />
joint-stock banks whose directors retained <strong>the</strong> major part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> capital. The current<br />
functional definition <strong>of</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>banking</strong> – portfolio management on behalf <strong>of</strong> very<br />
wealthy individuals − only took shape in <strong>the</strong> last quarter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> twentieth century.<br />
Beforehand, <strong>private</strong> banks were engaged in all types <strong>of</strong> activities: commercial<br />
<strong>banking</strong>, investment <strong>banking</strong>, merchant <strong>banking</strong>, indeed universal <strong>banking</strong>, as<br />
well as wealth management. Specialization in one or ano<strong>the</strong>r activity depended on<br />
strategic choices or on <strong>the</strong> constraints deriving from a specific <strong>banking</strong> system.<br />
These various activities were performed at two different levels. The first level<br />
was <strong>the</strong> <strong>world</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> haute banque, <strong>the</strong> old established <strong>private</strong> banks mostly<br />
involved in <strong>the</strong> financing <strong>of</strong> international trade and <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> foreign loans – what<br />
<br />
Quoted in T.E. Gregory, The Westminster Bank Through a Century, 2 vols (London,<br />
1936), vol. 1, p. 283.