27.08.2014 Views

the world of private banking

the world of private banking

the world of private banking

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44<br />

THE WORLD OF PRIVAtE BANKING<br />

Westminster Bank was ‘a big confession that <strong>the</strong> era <strong>of</strong> <strong>private</strong> firms has passed<br />

and that <strong>the</strong> day <strong>of</strong> joint-stock <strong>banking</strong> is fully and finally acknowledged. It is an<br />

avowal that one kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>banking</strong> must give way to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, which is <strong>the</strong> better’. <br />

The prediction did, <strong>of</strong> course, in <strong>the</strong> end materialize, though <strong>the</strong> process greatly<br />

varied, whe<strong>the</strong>r in speed, extent or significance, depending on <strong>the</strong> country, region<br />

or type <strong>of</strong> bank involved. The history <strong>of</strong> <strong>private</strong> banks during <strong>the</strong> onset <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

corporate economy, from around 1870 to 1914, does not fit easily into a simple<br />

‘decline and fall’ framework <strong>of</strong> analysis. It is more complex, and <strong>the</strong>refore more<br />

interesting, raising <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conditions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir survival, <strong>the</strong>ir lasting<br />

economic significance, and <strong>the</strong>ir complex relationships with <strong>the</strong> joint-stock banks.<br />

These questions are examined in this chapter. The main argument is that <strong>the</strong><br />

lasting significance <strong>of</strong> <strong>private</strong> banks can be explained both by <strong>the</strong> competitive<br />

advantage which <strong>the</strong>y enjoyed in some areas, and by <strong>the</strong> economic, political,<br />

and socio-cultural context <strong>of</strong> late-nineteenth-century <strong>banking</strong> development. This<br />

context, however, differed between countries, with <strong>the</strong> competitiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>private</strong><br />

bankers varying accordingly. The comparative approach adopted here attempts to<br />

account for <strong>the</strong>se differences. The chapter is divided into five parts. After a brief<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> <strong>private</strong> banks, <strong>the</strong> <strong>world</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> haute banque is analysed in some<br />

detail, followed by a shorter discussion <strong>of</strong> provincial <strong>private</strong> banks. A fourth part<br />

considers <strong>the</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>private</strong> bankers to <strong>banking</strong> development, and some<br />

conclusions are proposed in a fifth and final part.<br />

What is a Private Bank?<br />

For <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this study, <strong>private</strong> banks have been defined in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

ownership ra<strong>the</strong>r than activity. In <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century and during most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

twentieth century, a bank was considered as a <strong>private</strong> bank if its owners were<br />

also its managers. Such banks were usually family firms. Their legal form was<br />

generally that <strong>of</strong> partnerships, or a general partnership, with partners having<br />

unlimited responsibility; but <strong>the</strong>re were also <strong>private</strong> limited companies and even<br />

joint-stock banks whose directors retained <strong>the</strong> major part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> capital. The current<br />

functional definition <strong>of</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>banking</strong> – portfolio management on behalf <strong>of</strong> very<br />

wealthy individuals − only took shape in <strong>the</strong> last quarter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> twentieth century.<br />

Beforehand, <strong>private</strong> banks were engaged in all types <strong>of</strong> activities: commercial<br />

<strong>banking</strong>, investment <strong>banking</strong>, merchant <strong>banking</strong>, indeed universal <strong>banking</strong>, as<br />

well as wealth management. Specialization in one or ano<strong>the</strong>r activity depended on<br />

strategic choices or on <strong>the</strong> constraints deriving from a specific <strong>banking</strong> system.<br />

These various activities were performed at two different levels. The first level<br />

was <strong>the</strong> <strong>world</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> haute banque, <strong>the</strong> old established <strong>private</strong> banks mostly<br />

involved in <strong>the</strong> financing <strong>of</strong> international trade and <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> foreign loans – what<br />

<br />

Quoted in T.E. Gregory, The Westminster Bank Through a Century, 2 vols (London,<br />

1936), vol. 1, p. 283.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!