the world of private banking
the world of private banking
the world of private banking
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 14<br />
Private Bankers and Philanthropy:<br />
<strong>the</strong> City <strong>of</strong> London, 1880s–1920s<br />
Pat Thane<br />
Philanthropy and <strong>the</strong> British Elite<br />
The location at which <strong>the</strong> lives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> very poor and <strong>the</strong> very rich touched,<br />
glancingly, in late Victorian and Edwardian England was that <strong>of</strong> philanthropy.<br />
In recent years historians have become increasingly aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong><br />
philanthropic giving in <strong>the</strong> culture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> period, thanks, in particular, to <strong>the</strong> work<br />
<strong>of</strong> Frank Prochaska . Few <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> substantially wealthy did not make substantial<br />
charitable donations; many also gave considerable amounts <strong>of</strong> time to charitable<br />
administration. How much was given by how many is unknown, and probably<br />
unknowable since much <strong>of</strong> this activity went unrecorded or <strong>the</strong> records <strong>of</strong> dead<br />
charities have been lost. The commitment to philanthropy among <strong>the</strong> elite was<br />
led by <strong>the</strong> Royal Family. As Prochaska has shown with fascinating detail, royal<br />
patronage <strong>of</strong> and donations to charities were well established in <strong>the</strong> eighteenth<br />
century. These became a more prominent role <strong>of</strong> monarchy under <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong><br />
Prince Albert. He needed to find a role, was seriously committed to public service<br />
and <strong>the</strong> improvement <strong>of</strong> social conditions and was early to appreciate <strong>the</strong> importance<br />
<strong>of</strong> securing <strong>the</strong> popularity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> monarchy and <strong>of</strong> building direct links with <strong>the</strong><br />
wider population through involvement in <strong>the</strong> provincial, as well as metropolitan,<br />
charities with which pr<strong>of</strong>essional and business families were closely involved.<br />
After Albert’s death, Victoria continued this philanthropic crusade. Though she<br />
<strong>of</strong>fended her politicians by withdrawal from political functions, she took care not<br />
to <strong>of</strong>fend her people by withdrawal from public displays <strong>of</strong> philanthropy. For many<br />
years she did not open Parliament, but she did open hospitals. She spent about ten<br />
per cent <strong>of</strong> her <strong>private</strong> income on charitable giving. This can be compared with<br />
<br />
F. Prochaska Women and Philanthropy in 19th Century England (Oxford, 1980);<br />
F. Prochaska, ‘Philanthropy’, in F.M.L. Thompson (ed.), The Cambridge Social History <strong>of</strong><br />
Britain, 1750–1950 (Cambridge, 1990), vol. 3, pp. 357–93; F. Prochaska, The Voluntary<br />
Impulse: Philanthropy in Modern Britain (London, 1988); F. Prochaska, Philanthropy and<br />
<strong>the</strong> Hospitals <strong>of</strong> London: <strong>the</strong> King’s Fund 1897–1990 (Oxford, 1992); F. Prochaska, Royal<br />
Bounty: <strong>the</strong> Making <strong>of</strong> a Welfare Monarchy (Yale, 1995).<br />
<br />
Prochaska, Royal Bounty.<br />
<br />
Ibid., pp. 110 ff.<br />
<br />
Ibid., p. 78.