27.08.2014 Views

the world of private banking

the world of private banking

the world of private banking

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 14<br />

Private Bankers and Philanthropy:<br />

<strong>the</strong> City <strong>of</strong> London, 1880s–1920s<br />

Pat Thane<br />

Philanthropy and <strong>the</strong> British Elite<br />

The location at which <strong>the</strong> lives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> very poor and <strong>the</strong> very rich touched,<br />

glancingly, in late Victorian and Edwardian England was that <strong>of</strong> philanthropy.<br />

In recent years historians have become increasingly aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong><br />

philanthropic giving in <strong>the</strong> culture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> period, thanks, in particular, to <strong>the</strong> work<br />

<strong>of</strong> Frank Prochaska . Few <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> substantially wealthy did not make substantial<br />

charitable donations; many also gave considerable amounts <strong>of</strong> time to charitable<br />

administration. How much was given by how many is unknown, and probably<br />

unknowable since much <strong>of</strong> this activity went unrecorded or <strong>the</strong> records <strong>of</strong> dead<br />

charities have been lost. The commitment to philanthropy among <strong>the</strong> elite was<br />

led by <strong>the</strong> Royal Family. As Prochaska has shown with fascinating detail, royal<br />

patronage <strong>of</strong> and donations to charities were well established in <strong>the</strong> eighteenth<br />

century. These became a more prominent role <strong>of</strong> monarchy under <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong><br />

Prince Albert. He needed to find a role, was seriously committed to public service<br />

and <strong>the</strong> improvement <strong>of</strong> social conditions and was early to appreciate <strong>the</strong> importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> securing <strong>the</strong> popularity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> monarchy and <strong>of</strong> building direct links with <strong>the</strong><br />

wider population through involvement in <strong>the</strong> provincial, as well as metropolitan,<br />

charities with which pr<strong>of</strong>essional and business families were closely involved.<br />

After Albert’s death, Victoria continued this philanthropic crusade. Though she<br />

<strong>of</strong>fended her politicians by withdrawal from political functions, she took care not<br />

to <strong>of</strong>fend her people by withdrawal from public displays <strong>of</strong> philanthropy. For many<br />

years she did not open Parliament, but she did open hospitals. She spent about ten<br />

per cent <strong>of</strong> her <strong>private</strong> income on charitable giving. This can be compared with<br />

<br />

F. Prochaska Women and Philanthropy in 19th Century England (Oxford, 1980);<br />

F. Prochaska, ‘Philanthropy’, in F.M.L. Thompson (ed.), The Cambridge Social History <strong>of</strong><br />

Britain, 1750–1950 (Cambridge, 1990), vol. 3, pp. 357–93; F. Prochaska, The Voluntary<br />

Impulse: Philanthropy in Modern Britain (London, 1988); F. Prochaska, Philanthropy and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Hospitals <strong>of</strong> London: <strong>the</strong> King’s Fund 1897–1990 (Oxford, 1992); F. Prochaska, Royal<br />

Bounty: <strong>the</strong> Making <strong>of</strong> a Welfare Monarchy (Yale, 1995).<br />

<br />

Prochaska, Royal Bounty.<br />

<br />

Ibid., pp. 110 ff.<br />

<br />

Ibid., p. 78.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!