the world of private banking
the world of private banking
the world of private banking
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
90<br />
THE WORLD OF PRIVAtE BANKING<br />
had become significant by <strong>the</strong> late 1870s, being equivalent to about a fifth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
deposits held by all United Kingdom domestic banks. 68<br />
VI<br />
Probably <strong>the</strong> most explosive element <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid-nineteenth century ‘Big Bang’ was<br />
<strong>the</strong> finance companies. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir multifarious activities during <strong>the</strong> hectic boom<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid-1860s have already been referred to en passant in previous sections. 69<br />
Between 1863 and 1865, 35 finance companies were formed publicly in both <strong>the</strong><br />
City and <strong>the</strong> provinces, as were seven closely related land-finance companies.<br />
Each had a particular origin, but <strong>the</strong> general, seminal forces that shaped <strong>the</strong>ir birth<br />
and subsequent nature were <strong>the</strong> London money market’s ‘exceptional’ business<br />
from <strong>the</strong> 1850s, industrial <strong>banking</strong> and <strong>the</strong> marked increase in British capital<br />
exports after <strong>the</strong> mid-1850s. These generalities were mixed with particularities,<br />
such as Anglo-European financial co-operation from <strong>the</strong> 1850s and a strong<br />
business emphasis upon <strong>the</strong> Near East and <strong>the</strong> Orient. The latter had arisen, first,<br />
from Europe’s financial penetration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ottoman Empire brought about by <strong>the</strong><br />
Crimean War, second, <strong>the</strong> Indian Mutiny and, third, <strong>the</strong> American Civil War and<br />
<strong>the</strong> ensuing ‘Cotton Famine’. 70<br />
Their room for manoeuvre within <strong>the</strong> City and <strong>the</strong> English financial sector was<br />
constrained in part because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> already well-filled, established specialist niches<br />
that comprised <strong>the</strong> markets. There was little opportunity for <strong>the</strong> finance companies<br />
to penetrate domestic <strong>banking</strong>, beyond promoting fur<strong>the</strong>r corporate institutions,<br />
although a few raised some loan capital by taking term deposits and issuing shortterm<br />
debentures, which totalled £0.35m. in mid-1865. Their own record shows<br />
that <strong>the</strong>re were few possibilities for <strong>the</strong>ir managements and staffs to deal in fine<br />
bills, a business which many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lesser corporate discount houses also found<br />
difficult to penetrate. As will be discussed later, <strong>the</strong> finance companies’ bill cases<br />
largely arose from facilities provided to railway contractors, paper also taken up<br />
by Overend, Gurney along with <strong>the</strong> corporate discount companies and some <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> new limited banks. Being forced to work largely upon <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own<br />
equities and creditworthiness, <strong>the</strong>y had no substantial openings for developing<br />
as fully fledged investment or universal banks despite outwardly being modelled<br />
upon <strong>the</strong> Crédit Mobilier.<br />
In any case, <strong>the</strong> Mobilier was rightly distrusted within <strong>the</strong> City and England<br />
during <strong>the</strong> early 1860s. Even <strong>the</strong> one finance company that came from within <strong>the</strong><br />
‘square mile’, <strong>the</strong> International Financial Society, immediately ran up against this<br />
opposition, while an invitation to Barings to be one <strong>of</strong> its founders received <strong>the</strong><br />
68<br />
Capie and Webber, Monetary History <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United Kingdom, pp. 253–4.<br />
69<br />
For a full account and analysis, see Cottrell, Investment Banking, I, pp. 175–417,<br />
II, pp. 418–56.<br />
70<br />
See Cottrell, Investment Banking, vol. I, pp. 86–128.