09.08.2014 Views

Plymouthhistory

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A New Theatre Royal<br />

In 1810, John Foulston won a competition to design a new theatre, hotel and assembly rooms on<br />

George Street. His neo-classical design, with a portico of 30 foot columns, opened in 1813. Its<br />

foundation stone contained a vase of Plymouth porcelain and gold and silver coins for luck. With<br />

thick walls, Foulston believed he had built the only fireproof theatre in the country, but<br />

unfortunately it did catch fire in 1878, and had to be refurbished.<br />

While Foulston’s Theatre Royal was being built, John Kelland defied the local laws by opening a<br />

theatre in his tavern the Fox and Goose near Frankfort Place. The magistrate declared this an<br />

incentive to vice. Kelland was reprimanded and the young actors put in the dock and required to<br />

improve their behaviour. So much for community theatre.<br />

The old Plymouth Theatre at Frankfort Gate did continue for a time and in 1825 presented a short<br />

season of “A Grand Serious Pantomime in four Acts” called “Haradin, the Chief of Turks”, but this<br />

establishment does not appear to have lasted much longer.<br />

The new Theatre Royal opened with Shakespeare’s As You Like It and a version of The Taming of<br />

the Shrew, but the local audience were more interested in singing "Paudeen O'Rafferty," a<br />

disreputable song at the time that was forbidden. Fights broke out and the Mayor had to suppress<br />

the disorder by sending in the constables.<br />

Nineteenth century audiences demanded<br />

spectacle and the Theatre Royal delivered<br />

dramatic aerial effects, flames and herds of live<br />

horses. In 1815, the famous circus performer<br />

Andrew Ducrow ascended the gallery standing<br />

on his head on top of a balloon, with two boys<br />

suspended from the basket.<br />

Foulston's Royal Hotel, Theatre & Assembly Rooms, Plymouth.<br />

In spite of all this, the theatre did not make<br />

money, and the manager Mr Brunton<br />

complained that there was a high ‘moral<br />

principle’ in certain classes that was<br />

undermining theatre in Plymouth. As he<br />

relinquished the lease, Mr Brunton argued<br />

against his critics that drama must show all<br />

aspects of society, the vice as well as the<br />

virtue.<br />

Mr Davenport took over the Theatre Royal’s lease in 1837, announcing he had the fortune to<br />

maintain it, but it was quickly discovered he was interested only in getting himself onto the stage.<br />

His performance of Virginius in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales was so dire that the audience boo’d<br />

him. He ignored them and went on to attempt Othello – well, that small portion of the text he could<br />

remember. Defying all his critics, Mr Davenport insisted on being in every play.<br />

Mr Hay, the next manager, was censured by the Corporation as his plays were considered<br />

immoral. Eventually Mr Hay fell behind in the rent and was forced to leave, declaring it was<br />

impossible to make the Theatre Royal pay:<br />

“It is too large for the town; very frequently it is a mere wilderness; it presents a most<br />

melancholy and comfortless sight; and it is impossible for the actor to dispel the prevailing<br />

sadness."<br />

While Mr Hay was all melancholy, the Dock Theatre was succeeding with comedy in the form of a<br />

performer called James Doel who only had to walk on stage and say “What are you laughing at?”<br />

to have the audience in stitches. In 1824, it became the Devonport Theatre which eventually<br />

closed in 1899 to be reopened on Fore Street the same year. Also private theatricals thrived in<br />

local mansions including Saltram House, making the Theatre Royal difficult to fill.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!