06.08.2014 Views

FINAL VERSION FOR APPROVAL - Sdn Bhd - WWF Malaysia

FINAL VERSION FOR APPROVAL - Sdn Bhd - WWF Malaysia

FINAL VERSION FOR APPROVAL - Sdn Bhd - WWF Malaysia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Gunung Stong State Park Preliminary Management Plan<br />

6.9.3 Buffer Areas Within Alienated Land<br />

This category of buffer is found mainly along the eastern boundary of GSSP. This is to<br />

minimise human-wildlife conflicts and encroachment. The inclusion of alienated land within<br />

the buffer zone of the park does not require a change in land-ownership from private landowners<br />

to the state government. The land ownership status may remain unchanged but<br />

activities on alienated land within the buffer zone will have to be regulated so as to minimise<br />

negative impacts on GSSP. For example, if the alienated land is under tree cover, such as<br />

rubber or oilpalm plantation, then it should remain as such. The use of chemicals such as<br />

pesticides and artificial fertilisers should also be minimised. Activities that have major and<br />

long-lasting impacts on the environment such as mining, large-scale land development and<br />

quarrying, should be strictly prohibited within buffer areas.<br />

6.10 Physical Development<br />

If the Perlis State Park model is to be adapted, there are ample provisions for development in<br />

GSSP, as articulated in the legislation for Perlis State Park. For instance, in the Forest (State<br />

Park) Rules 2002 of Perlis, under section 8(2):<br />

“The Director, subject to directions that may be issued by the State Executive Committee,<br />

with the approval of the Chief Minister, by order published in the Gazette may appoint any<br />

person or company:<br />

(a) to build, manage, or maintain any building, facilities; or infrastructure; or<br />

(b) to undertake the provision of services within the state park.”<br />

Section 8(4) also states:<br />

“…the Director may within the state park:<br />

(a) construct such trails, interpretive displays, signage, buildings, and fences, and<br />

provide water supplies and refuse disposal facilities as he considers necessary;<br />

(b) provide such accommodation, amenities, facilities and service within designated<br />

zones as are likely to attract visitors to the state park and are not prejudicial to the<br />

proper care, control, and management thereof.”<br />

However, Section 8(5) states that:<br />

“Before any approval is given under subsection (4), the Director shall be satisfied that:<br />

(a) the construction of such infrastructures, facilities or buildings is essential and in the<br />

interest of the public; and<br />

(b) an environmental impact assessment of such infrastructures, facilities, or buildings<br />

has been undertaken and that all conditions and measures to mitigate against any<br />

adverse environmental impact have been complied with, or implemented to the<br />

satisfaction of the director.”<br />

However, to prevent any undesirable effects to wildlife, their interests, as provided in the<br />

Protection of Wild Life Act 1972, are safeguarded in Section 9 of the Forest Rules.<br />

Development in GSSP must be compatible with its primary purpose and objectives of<br />

conservation, which must not be compromised by unsustainable tourism, and as such, must be<br />

consistent with the protected area setting. Construction of physical facilities for tourism<br />

within protected areas is one of the prescribed activities under the Environmental Quality<br />

(Prescribed Activities) (Environmental Impact Assessment) Order 1987 of the Environmental<br />

Quality Act 1974.<br />

Under the Order, the activities listed below (relevant to GSSP) that would require an EIA are:<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!