01.08.2014 Views

Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models

Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models

Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.5. HYPOTHESIS TESTS 75<br />

4.5.2 Anderson-Darling test<br />

This test is similar to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, but uses a different measure <strong>of</strong> the difference<br />

between the two distribution functions. The test statistic is<br />

Z u<br />

A 2 [F n (x) − F ∗ (x)] 2<br />

= n<br />

t F ∗ (x)[1 − F ∗ (x)] f ∗ (x)dx.<br />

That is, it is a weighted average <strong>of</strong> the squared differences between the empirical <strong>and</strong> model distribution<br />

functions. Note that when x is close to t or to u, the weights might be very large due<br />

to the small value <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the factors in the denominator. This test statistic tends to place more<br />

emphasis on good fit in the tails than in the middle <strong>of</strong> the distribution. Calculating with this<br />

formula appears to be challenging. However, for individual data (so this is another test that does<br />

not work for grouped data), the integral simplifies to<br />

kX<br />

A 2 = −nF ∗ (u)+n [1 − F n (y j )] 2 {ln[1 − F ∗ (y j )] − ln[1 − F ∗ (y j+1 )]}<br />

j=0<br />

kX<br />

+n F n (y j ) 2 [ln F ∗ (y j+1 ) − ln F ∗ (y j )]<br />

j=1<br />

where the unique non-censored data points are t = y 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!