Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models
Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models
Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.4. GRAPHICAL COMPARISON OF THE DENSITY AND DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS69<br />
Exponential Fit<br />
F(x)<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
0 200 400 600 800 1000<br />
x<br />
Model<br />
Empirical<br />
Model vs. data cdf plot for Data Set B censored at 1,000<br />
Once again, the exponential model does not fit well.<br />
¤<br />
Exercise 75 Repeat the above example, using a Weibull model in place <strong>of</strong> the exponential model.<br />
When the model’s distribution function is close to the empirical distribution function, it is<br />
difficult to make small distinctions. Among the many ways to amplify those distinctions, two<br />
will be presented here. The first is to simply plot the difference <strong>of</strong> the two functions. That is,<br />
if F n (x) is the empirical distribution function <strong>and</strong> F ∗ (x) is the model distribution function, plot<br />
D(x) =F n (x) − F ∗ (x).<br />
Example 4.12 Plot D(x) for the previous example.<br />
For Data Set B truncated at 50, the plot is as follows.