01.08.2014 Views

Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models

Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models

Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.3. VARIANCE AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS 57<br />

For the lognormal distribution, the maximum likelihood estimates are the solutions to the two<br />

equations<br />

nX ln x j − µ<br />

σ 2 =0<strong>and</strong> − n nX<br />

σ + (ln x j − µ) 2<br />

σ 3 =0.<br />

j=1<br />

From the first equation, ˆµ =<br />

n 1 P n<br />

j=1 ln x j <strong>and</strong> from the second equation, ˆσ 2 =<br />

n 1 P n<br />

j=1 (ln x j − ˆµ) 2 .<br />

For Data Set B the values are ˆµ =6.1379 <strong>and</strong> ˆσ 2 =1.9305 or ˆσ =1.3894. With regard to the<br />

covariance matrix the true values are needed. The best we can do is substitute the estimated values<br />

to obtain<br />

dVar(ˆµ, ˆσ) =<br />

j=1<br />

· 0.0965 0<br />

0 0.0483<br />

¸<br />

. (3.4)<br />

The multiple “hats” in the expression indicate that this is an estimate <strong>of</strong> the variance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

estimators. ¤<br />

The zeroes <strong>of</strong>f the diagonal indicate that the two parameter estimates are asymptotically uncorrelated.<br />

For the particular case <strong>of</strong> the lognormal distribution, that is also true for any sample size.<br />

One thing we could do with this information is construct approximate 95% confidence intervals for<br />

the true parameter values. These would be 1.96 st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations either side <strong>of</strong> the estimate:<br />

µ : 6.1379 ± 1.96(0.0965) 1/2 =6.1379 ± 0.6089<br />

σ : 1.3894 ± 1.96(0.0483) 1/2 =1.3894 ± 0.4308.<br />

To obtain the information matrix, it is necessary to take both derivatives <strong>and</strong> expected values.<br />

This is not always easy to do. A way to avoid this problem is to simply not take the expected<br />

value. Rather than working with the number that results from the expectation, use the observed<br />

data points. The result is called the observed information.<br />

Example 3.31 Estimate the covariance in the previous example using the observed information.<br />

Substituting the observations into the second derivatives produces<br />

∂ 2 l<br />

∂µ 2 = − n σ 2 = −20 σ 2<br />

∂ 2 l<br />

nX<br />

∂σ∂µ = −2<br />

j=1<br />

∂ 2 l<br />

∂σ 2 = n nX<br />

σ 2 − 3<br />

ln x j − µ 122.7576 − 20µ<br />

σ 3 = −2<br />

σ 3<br />

j=1<br />

(ln x j − µ) 2<br />

σ 4 = 20<br />

− 245.5152µ +20µ2<br />

− 3792.0801<br />

σ2 σ 4 .<br />

Inserting the parameter estimates produces the negatives <strong>of</strong> the entries <strong>of</strong> the observed information,<br />

∂ 2 l<br />

∂µ 2 = −10.3600<br />

∂ 2 l<br />

∂σ∂µ = 0<br />

∂ 2 l<br />

∂σ 2 = −20.7190.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!