Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models
Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models
Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
42 CHAPTER 3. SAMPLING PROPERTIES OF ESTIMATORS<br />
3.2.4 Mean squared error<br />
While consistency is nice, most estimators have this property. What would be truly impressive is<br />
an estimator that is not only correct on average, but comes very close most <strong>of</strong> the time <strong>and</strong>, in<br />
particular, comes closer than rival estimators. One measure, for a finite sample, is motivated by<br />
the definition <strong>of</strong> consistency. The quality <strong>of</strong> an estimator could be measured by the probability<br />
that it gets within δ <strong>of</strong> the true value–that is, by measuring Pr(|ˆθ n − θ| < δ). But the choice <strong>of</strong> δ<br />
is arbitrary <strong>and</strong> we prefer measures that cannot be altered to suit the investigator’s whim. Then<br />
we might consider E(|ˆθ n −θ|), the average absolute error. But we know that working with absolute<br />
values <strong>of</strong>ten presents unpleasant mathematical challenges, <strong>and</strong> so the following has become widely<br />
accepted as a measure <strong>of</strong> accuracy.<br />
Definition 3.11 The mean squared error (MSE) <strong>of</strong> an estimator is<br />
MSEˆθ(θ) =E[(ˆθ − θ) 2 |θ].<br />
Note that the MSE is a function <strong>of</strong> the true value <strong>of</strong> the parameter. An estimator may perform<br />
extremely well for some values <strong>of</strong> the parameter, but poorly for others.<br />
Example 3.12 Consider the estimator ˆθ =5<strong>of</strong> an unknown parameter θ. The MSE is (5 − θ) 2 ,<br />
which is very small when θ is near 5 but becomes poor for other values. Of course this estimate is<br />
both biased <strong>and</strong> inconsistent unless θ is exactly equal to 5. ¤<br />
A result that follows directly from the various definitions is<br />
MSEˆθ(θ) =E{[ˆθ − E(ˆθ|θ)+E(ˆθ|θ) − θ] 2 |θ} = Var(ˆθ|θ)+[biasˆθ(θ)] 2 . (3.1)<br />
If we restrict attention to only unbiased estimators, the best such could be defined as follows.<br />
Definition 3.13 An estimator, ˆθ, iscalledauniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator<br />
(UMVUE) if it is unbiased <strong>and</strong> for any true value <strong>of</strong> θ there is no other unbiased estimator<br />
that has a smaller variance.<br />
Because we are looking only at unbiased estimators it would have been equally effective to make<br />
the definition in terms <strong>of</strong> MSE. We could also generalize the definition by looking for estimators<br />
that are uniformly best with regard to MSE, but the previous example indicates why that is not<br />
feasible. There are a few theorems that can assist with the determination <strong>of</strong> UMVUEs. However,<br />
such estimators are difficult to determine. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, MSE is still a useful criterion for<br />
comparing two alternative estimators.<br />
Example 3.14 For Example 3.2 compare the MSEs <strong>of</strong> the sample mean <strong>and</strong> 1.2 times the sample<br />
median.<br />
The sample mean has variance<br />
Var(X)<br />
3<br />
= θ2<br />
3 .