01.08.2014 Views

Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models

Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models

Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

42 CHAPTER 3. SAMPLING PROPERTIES OF ESTIMATORS<br />

3.2.4 Mean squared error<br />

While consistency is nice, most estimators have this property. What would be truly impressive is<br />

an estimator that is not only correct on average, but comes very close most <strong>of</strong> the time <strong>and</strong>, in<br />

particular, comes closer than rival estimators. One measure, for a finite sample, is motivated by<br />

the definition <strong>of</strong> consistency. The quality <strong>of</strong> an estimator could be measured by the probability<br />

that it gets within δ <strong>of</strong> the true value–that is, by measuring Pr(|ˆθ n − θ| < δ). But the choice <strong>of</strong> δ<br />

is arbitrary <strong>and</strong> we prefer measures that cannot be altered to suit the investigator’s whim. Then<br />

we might consider E(|ˆθ n −θ|), the average absolute error. But we know that working with absolute<br />

values <strong>of</strong>ten presents unpleasant mathematical challenges, <strong>and</strong> so the following has become widely<br />

accepted as a measure <strong>of</strong> accuracy.<br />

Definition 3.11 The mean squared error (MSE) <strong>of</strong> an estimator is<br />

MSEˆθ(θ) =E[(ˆθ − θ) 2 |θ].<br />

Note that the MSE is a function <strong>of</strong> the true value <strong>of</strong> the parameter. An estimator may perform<br />

extremely well for some values <strong>of</strong> the parameter, but poorly for others.<br />

Example 3.12 Consider the estimator ˆθ =5<strong>of</strong> an unknown parameter θ. The MSE is (5 − θ) 2 ,<br />

which is very small when θ is near 5 but becomes poor for other values. Of course this estimate is<br />

both biased <strong>and</strong> inconsistent unless θ is exactly equal to 5. ¤<br />

A result that follows directly from the various definitions is<br />

MSEˆθ(θ) =E{[ˆθ − E(ˆθ|θ)+E(ˆθ|θ) − θ] 2 |θ} = Var(ˆθ|θ)+[biasˆθ(θ)] 2 . (3.1)<br />

If we restrict attention to only unbiased estimators, the best such could be defined as follows.<br />

Definition 3.13 An estimator, ˆθ, iscalledauniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator<br />

(UMVUE) if it is unbiased <strong>and</strong> for any true value <strong>of</strong> θ there is no other unbiased estimator<br />

that has a smaller variance.<br />

Because we are looking only at unbiased estimators it would have been equally effective to make<br />

the definition in terms <strong>of</strong> MSE. We could also generalize the definition by looking for estimators<br />

that are uniformly best with regard to MSE, but the previous example indicates why that is not<br />

feasible. There are a few theorems that can assist with the determination <strong>of</strong> UMVUEs. However,<br />

such estimators are difficult to determine. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, MSE is still a useful criterion for<br />

comparing two alternative estimators.<br />

Example 3.14 For Example 3.2 compare the MSEs <strong>of</strong> the sample mean <strong>and</strong> 1.2 times the sample<br />

median.<br />

The sample mean has variance<br />

Var(X)<br />

3<br />

= θ2<br />

3 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!