Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models
Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models
Estimation, Evaluation, and Selection of Actuarial Models
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
20 CHAPTER 2. MODEL ESTIMATION<br />
In each case there is a parameter that relates to the spread <strong>of</strong> the kernel. In the first two cases<br />
it is the value <strong>of</strong> b>0, which is called the b<strong>and</strong>width. In the gamma case, the value <strong>of</strong> α controls<br />
the spread with a larger value indicating a smaller spread. There are other kernels that cover the<br />
range from zero to infinity.<br />
Exercise 12 Provide the formula for the Pareto kernel.<br />
Example 2.21 Determine the kernel density estimate for Example 2.8 using each <strong>of</strong> the three<br />
kernels.<br />
The empirical distribution places probability 1/8 at 1.0, 1/8 at 1.3, 2/8 at 1.5, 3/8 at 2.1, <strong>and</strong><br />
1/8 at 2.8. For a uniform kernel with a b<strong>and</strong>width <strong>of</strong> 0.1 we do not get much separation. The data<br />
point at 1.0 is replaced by a horizontal density function running from 0.9 to 1.1 with a height <strong>of</strong><br />
1 1<br />
8 2(0.1)<br />
=0.625. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, with a b<strong>and</strong>width <strong>of</strong> 1.0 that same data point is replaced by a<br />
horizontal density function running from 0.0 to 2.0 with a height <strong>of</strong> 1 8 1<br />
2(1)<br />
=0.0625. The following<br />
two figures provide plots <strong>of</strong> the density functions.<br />
f(x )<br />
2<br />
1.8<br />
1.6<br />
1.4<br />
1.2<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5<br />
x<br />
f(x )<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5<br />
x<br />
Uniform kernel density with b<strong>and</strong>width 0.1 Uniform kernel density with b<strong>and</strong>width 1.0<br />
It should be clear that the larger b<strong>and</strong>width provides more smoothing. In the limit, as the b<strong>and</strong>width<br />
approaches zero, the kernel density estimate matches the empirical estimate. Note that if the<br />
b<strong>and</strong>width is too large, probability will be assigned to negative values, which may be an undesirable<br />
result. Methods exist for dealing with that issue, but they will not be presented in this Note.<br />
For the triangular kernel, each point is replaced by a triangle. Pictures for the same two<br />
b<strong>and</strong>widths used above appear below.<br />
f(x )<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5<br />
x<br />
f(x )<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5<br />
x<br />
Triangular kernel density with b<strong>and</strong>width 0.1 Triangular kernel density with b<strong>and</strong>width 1.0<br />
Once again, the larger b<strong>and</strong>width provides more smoothing. The gamma kernel simply provides a<br />
mixture <strong>of</strong> gamma distributions (see the Part 3 Note) where each data point provides the mean <strong>and</strong>