Simandhar-swami
Simandhar-swami
Simandhar-swami
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4 Shree <strong>Simandhar</strong> Swami<br />
who do not know about the existence of these twenty<br />
tirthankaras. Many people question, “What do we have to do<br />
with them?” and believe that the twenty-four tirthankaras of<br />
the past are the only arihants. Because of such mistakes there<br />
is so much confusion and harm in the spiritual world. One can<br />
only benefit if a tirthankar is present today.<br />
Your recital of the Navkar Mantra can only be considered<br />
exact and correct if, while reciting it, <strong>Simandhar</strong> Swami comes<br />
to your mind and the obeisance is done to Him.<br />
People ask me why I make them say only <strong>Simandhar</strong><br />
Swami’s name and not those of the other twenty-four<br />
tirthankaras. I tell them we pay obeisance to the past twentyfour<br />
tirthankaras also, but we give more importance to<br />
<strong>Simandhar</strong> Swami, because he is the current tirthankar. Only<br />
He receives the obeisance of ‘Namo Arihantanam’.<br />
He Is, Currently Present, and Directly Accessible<br />
Questioner : Is <strong>Simandhar</strong> Swami in manifest form, live<br />
and visible to all?<br />
Dadashri : Yes. He is currently present. He is directly<br />
accessible and has a physical body. He presently lives and<br />
moves about as a tirthankar in Mahavideh Kshetra.<br />
Questioner : If <strong>Simandhar</strong> Swami is in Mahavideh Kshetra,<br />
then how can he be considered live and present for us?<br />
Dadashri : If <strong>Simandhar</strong> Swami were in Calcutta, even<br />
then He would be live and present, although you may not have<br />
seen him. This is the same for Mahavideh Kshetra.<br />
Difference Between Direct and Indirect Worship<br />
Questioner : Is there a difference in benefits between<br />
worshipping <strong>Simandhar</strong> Swami and Lord Mahavir?