31.07.2014 Views

(AsgiSA) Annual Report 2008 - South African Government Information

(AsgiSA) Annual Report 2008 - South African Government Information

(AsgiSA) Annual Report 2008 - South African Government Information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for <strong>South</strong> Africa<br />

ANNUAL REPORT<br />

<strong>2008</strong><br />

Table 4: Water and sanitation infrastructure delivery, 2004 to <strong>2008</strong><br />

Service<br />

Backlog in<br />

2004/05<br />

Water 10,6 m people 1,51 m<br />

people<br />

Sanitation 17,3 m people 1,3 m<br />

people<br />

Bucket Eradication<br />

252 254<br />

units<br />

Free Basic Water 14,8 m people 300 000<br />

people<br />

Achieved<br />

2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08<br />

1 m<br />

people<br />

800 000<br />

people<br />

0 62 206<br />

units<br />

2,46 m<br />

people<br />

1,25 m<br />

people<br />

940 000<br />

people<br />

71 747<br />

units<br />

490 000<br />

people<br />

1,27 m<br />

people<br />

1,2 m<br />

people<br />

95 218<br />

units<br />

4,95 m<br />

people<br />

Total added<br />

since 2004<br />

5,03 m people<br />

4,24 m people<br />

228 991 units<br />

8,2 m people<br />

DWAF (<strong>2008</strong>), Service Delivery: A Five-Year Rreview 2004 to Date, presentation to Parliamentary Committee<br />

on Water and Forestry Affairs by Director-General Ms Pam Yako, 21 October <strong>2008</strong>.<br />

http://www.pmg.org.za/files/docs/081021dwaf.ppt<br />

The financing of such services has largely been through the Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) and<br />

three important policy concerns have emerged recently around planning, financing and operational efficiency<br />

of water and sanitation infrastructure.<br />

Municipalities plan for such services through their integrated development plans (IDPs). The IDPs are<br />

often not in alignment with the plans of other spheres, including those related to overall water supply,<br />

housing, roads and transport 3 . The increasing dependence on grant financing, coupled with an<br />

apparent lack of sustainability of the way such services are financed is also of concern. This problem<br />

is interlinked with the general poor state of efficiency of operation and maintenance of water and<br />

sanitation systems and associated financial management systems 4 . In fairness to municipalities, the<br />

sheer scale of infrastructure required to eradicate water and sanitation backlogs have led to a focus on<br />

extending service coverage with a corresponding neglect of sound maintenance of both new and existing<br />

schemes, thereby eroding their asset base and compromising revenue generation. Measures being<br />

taken to address this include:<br />

3 <br />

This problem has been highlighted through various perspectives including the NSDP (<strong>2008</strong>), strategic plans of departments<br />

responsible for other infrastructure components, the Budget and various National Treasury reviews<br />

4<br />

DWAF (<strong>2008</strong>), Local government budget and expenditure review presentation, 11 November.<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!