On the Analysis of Optical Mapping Data - University of Wisconsin ...
On the Analysis of Optical Mapping Data - University of Wisconsin ...
On the Analysis of Optical Mapping Data - University of Wisconsin ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
76<br />
Chapter 5<br />
Future Work<br />
In <strong>the</strong> previous chapters, we have described some recent contributions to <strong>the</strong> statistical<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> optical map data. In particular, we have addressed parameter estimation in<br />
optical map models, <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> statistical significance <strong>of</strong> alignments, and <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />
optical map data to detect copy number alterations. Here, we briefly mention some possible<br />
future directions <strong>of</strong> research that arise as natural extensions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work reported here.<br />
5.1 Alignment<br />
Much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recent success in <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> optical mapping data has revolved around<br />
<strong>the</strong> alignment problem; specifically, alignment <strong>of</strong> optical maps against an in silico reference.<br />
Not all questions concerning alignment have been answered yet, and we may expect more<br />
successes by continuing research in this direction.<br />
5.1.1 Score function<br />
Principle: The conditional permutation test described in Chapter 3 is an important new<br />
method that allows us to evaluate and compare different score functions. This gives us a tool<br />
to experiment with new score functions and explore <strong>the</strong>ir suitability for various purposes.<br />
Although we have primarily used <strong>the</strong> SOMA score in our analysis, its derivation is ad hoc<br />
and somewhat unnatural from a probabilistic point <strong>of</strong> view. It can not be expressed in terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> a likelihood ratio test, and parameters in <strong>the</strong> score <strong>of</strong>ten have no natural interpretation.<br />
The model-based likelihood ratio score derived by Valouev et al. (2006) does not perform as