27.07.2014 Views

Amir Weiner Getting to Know You

Amir Weiner Getting to Know You

Amir Weiner Getting to Know You

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Forum: The Soviet Order at Home and Abroad, 1939–61<br />

<strong>Getting</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Know</strong> <strong>You</strong><br />

The Soviet Surveillance System, 1939–57<br />

<strong>Amir</strong> <strong>Weiner</strong> and Aigi Rahi-Tamm<br />

“Violence is the midwife of his<strong>to</strong>ry,” observed Marx and Engels. One could<br />

add that for their Bolshevik pupils, surveillance was the midwife’s guiding<br />

hand. Never averse <strong>to</strong> violence, the Bolsheviks were brutes driven by an<br />

idea, and a grandiose one at that. Matched by an entrenched conspira<strong>to</strong>rial<br />

political culture, a Manichean worldview, and a pervasive sense of isolation<br />

and siege mentality from within and from without, the drive <strong>to</strong> mold<br />

a new kind of society and individuals through the institutional triad of a<br />

nonmarket economy, single-party dicta<strong>to</strong>rship, and mass state terror required<br />

a vast information-gathering apparatus. Serving the two fundamental tasks<br />

of rooting out and integrating real and imagined enemies of the regime,<br />

and molding the population in<strong>to</strong> a new socialist society, Soviet surveillance<br />

assumed from the outset a distinctly pervasive, interventionist, and active<br />

mode that was translated in<strong>to</strong> myriad institutions, policies, and initiatives.<br />

Students of Soviet information systems have focused on two main<br />

features—denunciations and public mood reports—and for good reason.<br />

Soviet law criminalized the failure <strong>to</strong> report “treason and counterrevolutionary<br />

crimes,” and denunciation was celebrated as the ultimate civic act. 1 Whether<br />

a “weapon of the weak” used by the otherwise silenced population, a <strong>to</strong>ol by<br />

the regime <strong>to</strong> check its bureaucracy, or a classic feature of the <strong>to</strong>talitarian state<br />

franchising itself <strong>to</strong> individuals via denunciations of their fellow citizens—and<br />

quite likely all three—denunciations were critical in shattering old and forming<br />

For their invaluable comments and suggestions we extend special thanks <strong>to</strong> Alain Blum,<br />

Catherine Gousseff, David Holloway, Hiroaki Kuromiya, Norman Naimark, Ben Nathans,<br />

Yuri Slezkine; the participants in the Russian–East European workshops at the University<br />

of California, Berkeley; the Hoover Archive at Stanford University; Humboldt Universität,<br />

Berlin; and the readers and edi<strong>to</strong>rs of Kritika.<br />

1 Simon Wolin and Robert M. Schlusser, eds., The Soviet Secret Police (New York: Praeger,<br />

1957), 194.<br />

Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian His<strong>to</strong>ry 13, 1 (Winter 2012): 5–45.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!