25.07.2014 Views

Surface voltage and surface photovoltage - Dieter Schroder ...

Surface voltage and surface photovoltage - Dieter Schroder ...

Surface voltage and surface photovoltage - Dieter Schroder ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Surface</strong> <strong>voltage</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>surface</strong> photo<strong>voltage</strong><br />

Probe<br />

φ s<br />

V s<br />

-<br />

V P<br />

p-type<br />

V P<br />

+<br />

+<br />

+<br />

Q Q S<br />

-<br />

-<br />

p-type<br />

t air<br />

E vac /q<br />

V,<br />

φ<br />

W M<br />

W S<br />

φ s<br />

E c /q<br />

φ = 0<br />

E v /q<br />

x<br />

φ F<br />

V P<br />

φ s<br />

= V s<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Figure 3. Cross section <strong>and</strong> b<strong>and</strong> diagram of a metal–air–semiconductor system with zero work function difference: (a) no <strong>surface</strong> charge,<br />

(b) with <strong>surface</strong> charge.<br />

V ox<br />

Q 1<br />

V G φ s<br />

V G<br />

+<br />

+ +<br />

+<br />

+<br />

ρ ox<br />

p-type<br />

0 x 1 t ox x<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Figure 4. (a) MOS capacitor cross section showing a charge sheet Q 1 at x = x 1 <strong>and</strong> uniform charge ρ ox throughout the oxide; (b) the<br />

corresponding b<strong>and</strong> diagram showing oxide <strong>and</strong> <strong>surface</strong> potentials.<br />

Let us now extend this example to a Kelvin probe held<br />

above a semiconductor covered with an insulator <strong>and</strong> a probe–<br />

semiconductor work function difference W MS leading to the<br />

negative probe potential V P = W MS in figure 5(a). Next<br />

consider oxide charge density ρ ox (C cm −3 ) <strong>and</strong> <strong>surface</strong> charge<br />

density Q (C cm −2 )asinfigure 5(b). These charges induce<br />

charge density qN A W in the semiconductor (indicated by the<br />

negative charges) <strong>and</strong> qn on the probe (indicated by the solid<br />

circles, representing electrons). The probe <strong>voltage</strong>, calculated<br />

with the same approach as used for MOS capacitors, is<br />

V P = V FB + V air + V ox + φ. (7)<br />

The flatb<strong>and</strong> <strong>voltage</strong> in this case is<br />

V FB = W MS − t air<br />

t equ<br />

Q<br />

C equ<br />

− 1<br />

C equ<br />

∫ tequ<br />

t air<br />

x<br />

t equ<br />

ρ ox dx (8)<br />

where C equ is the equivalent capacitance <strong>and</strong> t equ the equivalent<br />

thickness given by<br />

C equ =<br />

C airC ox<br />

C air + C ox<br />

= ε 0<br />

t equ<br />

t equ = t air + t ox /K ox . (9)<br />

Equations (7)–(9) show the probe <strong>voltage</strong> to be due to W MS ,<br />

Q <strong>and</strong> ρ ox . A single measurement is unable to distinguish<br />

between these three parameters.<br />

Next we will consider the effect of light on the sample. For<br />

simplicity, we will use the bare sample in figure 6. Figure 6(a)<br />

shows the b<strong>and</strong> diagram with <strong>surface</strong> charge density Q in<br />

the dark <strong>and</strong> in figure 6(b) the sample is strongly illuminated<br />

driving the semiconductor to the flatb<strong>and</strong> condition <strong>and</strong> the<br />

probe potential approaches zero. Hence by measuring the<br />

<strong>surface</strong> <strong>voltage</strong> without <strong>and</strong> with light, we obtain the <strong>surface</strong><br />

potential <strong>and</strong> hence the charge density from equation (4). To<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> how this comes about, we must look at the flatb<strong>and</strong><br />

condition in more detail.<br />

The semiconductor charge density Q S for a p-type<br />

semiconductor in depletion or inversion is<br />

Q S =− √ 2kT K s ε 0 n i F(U S ,K) (10)<br />

where F is the normalized <strong>surface</strong> electric field, defined as [26]<br />

F(U S ,K)= [K(e −US + U S − 1) + K −1 (e US − U S − 1)<br />

+K(e US +e −US − 2)] 1/2 . (11)<br />

In this expression K = p 0 /n i (p 0 is the majority carrier<br />

density <strong>and</strong> n i the intrinsic carrier density), U s = qφ s /kT<br />

is the normalized <strong>surface</strong> potential, φ s the <strong>surface</strong> potential<br />

<strong>and</strong> the normalized excess carrier density ( = p/p 0 ,<br />

where p = n is the excess carrier density). In the<br />

absence of excess carriers, i.e., in equilibrium, the last term<br />

in equation (11) vanishes.<br />

F is plotted versus φ s in figure 7 as a function of the<br />

normalized excess carrier density, produced by illuminating<br />

the device. The electric field is related to the charge density<br />

through equation (10). Constant charge implies constant<br />

R19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!