25.07.2014 Views

The Role of the Mercury-Si Schottky-Barrier Height in ... - IEEE Xplore

The Role of the Mercury-Si Schottky-Barrier Height in ... - IEEE Xplore

The Role of the Mercury-Si Schottky-Barrier Height in ... - IEEE Xplore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHOI et al.: ROLE OF THE MERCURY-SI SCHOTTKY-BARRIER HEIGHT IN -MOSFET 1381<br />

Fig. 1.<br />

Band diagram for (a) no <strong>in</strong>terface states, (b) a surface state captur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

an electron, and (c) a high density <strong>of</strong> surface states at E 0 0:7 eV.<br />

0.7 eV, presumably because <strong>the</strong> hydrogen-term<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>Si</strong> surface<br />

is no longer passivated, and surface states form, lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to Fermi-level p<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g. should decrease to 0.42 eV when<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases to 0.7 eV.<br />

A similar barrier height change has been reported for Al–n-<strong>Si</strong><br />

<strong>Schottky</strong> barriers, where <strong>the</strong> barrier height changed from 0.45 to<br />

0.7 eV after Al evaporation and ag<strong>in</strong>g at room temperature for<br />

about 100 h [10]. <strong>The</strong> proposed mechanism is a positive oxide<br />

charge <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> th<strong>in</strong> oxide film ( 2 nm) between <strong>the</strong> Al and <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Si</strong> that exists at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> Al evaporation. This positive charge<br />

provides a dipole contribution, reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ideal barrier height.<br />

Thicker oxides lead to lower barrier heights. With ag<strong>in</strong>g, this<br />

positive charge dissipates and <strong>the</strong> true barrier height <strong>of</strong> 0.7 eV<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> charge dissipation mechanism was speculated to be<br />

due to electron <strong>in</strong>jection from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Si</strong> substrate. For our Hg–n-<strong>Si</strong><br />

case, we assume <strong>the</strong>re is no oxide immediately after HF etch<br />

and as <strong>the</strong> oxide forms, <strong>the</strong> barrier height reduces. Hence, we<br />

believe <strong>the</strong> mechanisms <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two cases to be different.<br />

Why does change? We propose a possible explanation.<br />

Fig. 1(a) shows <strong>the</strong> band diagram immediately after HF or NH F<br />

etch with its 0.45 eV barrier height. We believe <strong>the</strong> <strong>Si</strong> surface<br />

to be hydrogen term<strong>in</strong>ated with most <strong>of</strong> its surface states passivated<br />

by hydrogen. After expos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> H-term<strong>in</strong>ated sample<br />

to air, <strong>the</strong> barrier height changes and <strong>the</strong> Hg–<strong>Si</strong> contact angle<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases from 121 to 151 [9]. Clearly, <strong>the</strong> Hg–<strong>Si</strong> <strong>in</strong>terface<br />

changes physically and electrically. Dur<strong>in</strong>g room-temperature<br />

oxidation, <strong>Si</strong>–<strong>Si</strong> and <strong>Si</strong>–H bonds at <strong>the</strong> surface are converted to<br />

<strong>Si</strong>–O bonds. However, similar to <strong>the</strong>rmal oxidation at elevated<br />

temperatures, some <strong>Si</strong> bonds rema<strong>in</strong> “unbonded,” becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terface<br />

states. We believe <strong>the</strong>se to be surface generation sites or<br />

surface states. <strong>The</strong>se surface states are likely to be <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Schottky</strong>-barrier height changes. Let us consider <strong>the</strong> formation<br />

<strong>of</strong> surface states <strong>in</strong> Fig. 1(b). If <strong>the</strong>se states are acceptor-like,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y capture electrons from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Si</strong> substrate, lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

barrier height. With time, <strong>the</strong> surface state density <strong>in</strong>creases and<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ally saturates lead<strong>in</strong>g to Fermi-level p<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g [11], from <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>itial 0.45-eV barrier height to 0.7 eV, <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> Fig. 1(c).<br />

Are surface states generated dur<strong>in</strong>g room temperature oxidation?<br />

In an earlier paper, we showed that <strong>the</strong> effective SOI film<br />

generation lifetime , determ<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong> pulsed po<strong>in</strong>tcontact<br />

-MOSFET, varies with time follow<strong>in</strong>g HF passivation<br />

[12]. In this technique, <strong>the</strong> substrate potential is pulsed, driv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Si</strong> film <strong>in</strong>to deep depletion. <strong>The</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g electron-hole pair<br />

generation leads to a time-dependent dra<strong>in</strong> current, from which<br />

<strong>the</strong> effective generation lifetime is determ<strong>in</strong>ed [13]. <strong>The</strong> electron-hole<br />

pair generation takes place with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Si</strong> film, at <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Si</strong>/buried oxide <strong>in</strong>terface, and at <strong>the</strong> <strong>Si</strong> surface. After HF passivation,<br />

surface generation is low because <strong>the</strong>re are few surface<br />

Fig. 2.<br />

etch.<br />

Forward <strong>Schottky</strong> diode current as a function <strong>of</strong> time after dilute HF<br />

states. As <strong>the</strong> passivation loses its effectiveness, surface generation<br />

becomes active and decreases from 4 s and saturates<br />

at 0.17 s after about 100 h. <strong>The</strong> behavior is repeatable<br />

when <strong>the</strong> wafer is aga<strong>in</strong> r<strong>in</strong>sed <strong>in</strong> dilute HF. We found analogous<br />

behavior for SIMOX and bonded wafers and for dilute HF<br />

and dilute iod<strong>in</strong>e surface r<strong>in</strong>ses. We believe <strong>the</strong> effective generation<br />

lifetime behavior is caused primarily by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Si</strong> surface<br />

between source and dra<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t contacts, not by <strong>the</strong> contacts<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves. This surface changes with time, generat<strong>in</strong>g surface<br />

states, which, <strong>in</strong> turn, <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> surface electron-hole pair<br />

generation rate. It is very likely that similar surface changes affect<br />

<strong>the</strong> Hg–<strong>Si</strong> <strong>in</strong>terface.<br />

Fig. 2 shows <strong>the</strong> forward-bias current <strong>of</strong> an Hg–<strong>Si</strong> <strong>Schottky</strong><br />

diode on an n-<strong>Si</strong> substrate. <strong>The</strong> current is <strong>in</strong>itially very low,<br />

jumps to 0.9 mA after dilute HF etch and <strong>the</strong>n gradually decl<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

This behavior is similar to <strong>the</strong> pulsed -MOSFETs measurements<br />

for an entirely different structure. Instead <strong>of</strong> surface<br />

generation rate affected by <strong>the</strong> HF etch, <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2 it is <strong>the</strong> barrier<br />

height that is changed. For <strong>the</strong> measurements <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2, Hg<br />

contact was made for <strong>the</strong> measurements. <strong>The</strong> probe was lifted<br />

between measurements. Hence, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Si</strong> surface was exposed to<br />

air most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> time, except for <strong>the</strong> measurement times when<br />

<strong>the</strong> Hg probe contacted <strong>the</strong> surface.<br />

III.<br />

HgFET<br />

<strong>The</strong> HgFET is a version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Schottky</strong> MOSFET <strong>in</strong> Fig. 3,<br />

consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a bulk p-type substrate with <strong>Schottky</strong> source and<br />

dra<strong>in</strong> contacts, first proposed by Lepselter and Sze and later<br />

modified and demonstrated by o<strong>the</strong>rs [14]–[19]. <strong>The</strong> band diagrams<br />

near <strong>the</strong> surface are shown <strong>in</strong> Figs. 3 for zero, negative,<br />

and positive gate voltages. For dra<strong>in</strong> current to flow with negative<br />

gate voltage, <strong>the</strong> hole barrier height should be low,<br />

whereas for positive gate voltage <strong>the</strong> electron barrier height<br />

should be low, illustrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> conflict<strong>in</strong>g barrier height requirements<br />

for positive and negative gate voltages.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> earlier discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> barrier dependence<br />

on HF passivation, we have <strong>the</strong> situation <strong>in</strong> Fig. 4 for .For<br />

high , <strong>the</strong> dra<strong>in</strong> current is low, because it is difficult to <strong>in</strong>ject<br />

electrons from <strong>the</strong> source over <strong>the</strong> high barrier. For low , <strong>the</strong><br />

dra<strong>in</strong> current should be high, because now <strong>the</strong> barrier for electron<br />

<strong>in</strong>jection is significantly lowered. This, <strong>in</strong>deed, is what we

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!