25.07.2014 Views

Youth Customer Perception of Brand Big Bazaar - international ...

Youth Customer Perception of Brand Big Bazaar - international ...

Youth Customer Perception of Brand Big Bazaar - international ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International Indexed & Refereed Research Journal, ISSN 0975-3486,(Print)E-ISSN-2320-5482, April- May (Combind),2013 VOL-IV * ISSUE 43-44<br />

April-May ,2013<br />

Introduction<br />

India's Retail sector is wearing new clothes<br />

and with a three year compounded annual growth rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> 46.64 percent, retail is the fastest growing sector in<br />

the Indian economy. <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Bazaar</strong> a part <strong>of</strong> Future Group<br />

is a chain <strong>of</strong> hypermarket in India is designed as an<br />

agglomeration <strong>of</strong> bazaars with clusters <strong>of</strong>fering a wide<br />

range <strong>of</strong> merchandise. Now a day's youth plays an<br />

important role in the field <strong>of</strong> decision making, in this<br />

context the study also try to throw light on the youth<br />

perception and expectations in different ways towards<br />

the <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Bazaar</strong>.<br />

Literature Review<br />

SERVQUAL (Parsuraman et al, 1988) is a two<br />

part instrument for measuring service quality that was<br />

refined later (Parsuraman et al; 1991). Much <strong>of</strong> the<br />

research to date has focused on measuring service<br />

quality using this approach and its use has become<br />

quite widespread (Brown et al; 1993 and Kang and<br />

James, 2004) the instrument comprises <strong>of</strong> 22 items<br />

questionnaire which primarily measure dimensions<br />

namely Tangibles, Reliability, Assurance, Empathy and<br />

Responsiveness.<br />

Objective<br />

To find the quality gap <strong>of</strong> <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Bazaar</strong><br />

To suggest the measures to fill the quality gap and<br />

enabling <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Bazaar</strong> as a leading <strong>Brand</strong> among young<br />

sters<br />

Hypotheses<br />

H 0<br />

There is no significance difference between expected<br />

and perceived quality<br />

H 1<br />

There is a significant difference between expected and<br />

perceived quality<br />

Research Methodology:-<br />

DATA COLLECTION<br />

Research Paper-Marketing<br />

<strong>Youth</strong> <strong>Customer</strong> <strong>Perception</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brand</strong> <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Bazaar</strong>:<br />

An Empirical Investigation<br />

* Ankita Srivastava ** Dr. Sanjay Shankar Mishra<br />

* Asst. Pr<strong>of</strong>.Oriental Institute <strong>of</strong> Management, Affiliated to University <strong>of</strong> Mumbai<br />

** HOD, Commerce, TRS Auto, College Rewa, M.P.Awadhesh Pratap Singh University Rewa, M. P.<br />

A B S T R A C T<br />

In India, the retail sector is worth US$ 180 bn, growing at between 11-12% annually. <strong>Youth</strong>, being a critical segment, the<br />

marketers cannot ignore to dodge this particular segment. The paper attempts to identify the dimensions <strong>of</strong> service quality<br />

which are important to a customer (youth). SERVQUAL scale was used to discern the different dimensions <strong>of</strong> service quality<br />

and mean scores were used to find out if there is any gap between customer expectations and perceptions.<br />

Key words: Consumer Behavior, SERVQUAL, Retail<br />

Primary and Secondary<br />

UNIVERSE<br />

SAMPLE SIZE 55<br />

AREA OF STUDY Mumbai<br />

College Students above 23 years<br />

TOOL USED SERVQUAL scale<br />

STATISTICAL TECHNIQUE 2 tailed t-test<br />

Findings and Analysis<br />

The parametric test statistic was calculated<br />

using t-test to ascertain whether there is significant<br />

difference between expected and perceived level <strong>of</strong><br />

service.<br />

See Table 1<br />

Table depicts the difference between the means <strong>of</strong><br />

expected and perceived and the values have been tested<br />

by using t-test which shows that all the significant<br />

values <strong>of</strong> the pair are below 0.05 (except the location<br />

<strong>of</strong> the store), means the null hypothesis has been rejected<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> all the dimensions.<br />

See Table 2<br />

Suggestions<br />

<strong>Big</strong> <strong>Bazaar</strong> <strong>of</strong> India needs to focus more on its<br />

responsiveness attribute to improve the satisfaction<br />

level <strong>of</strong> youth customers, whereas the gap is minimum<br />

least for the tangibility shows better emphasis on this<br />

factor as compared to the other factors. <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Bazaar</strong><br />

should emphasize on improving its rating as this is a<br />

very important parameter for performance.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The GAP model depicts the overall perception<br />

score <strong>of</strong> <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Bazaar</strong> using RATER dimensions. It<br />

shows that <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Bazaar</strong> is not focusing equal on every<br />

factor which is important for customers as suggested<br />

by the high difference in scores on certain dimensions.<br />

It shows that <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Bazaar</strong> needs to make substantial<br />

effort (training, motivation etc) to improve their score<br />

on responsiveness dimension as it is an important<br />

criterion for customer service.<br />

76 RESEARCH ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION


International Indexed & Refereed Research Journal, ISSN 0975-3486,(Print)E-ISSN-2320-5482, April- May (Combind),2013 VOL-IV * ISSUE 43-44<br />

Table 1 Service Quality Gap For The <strong>Youth</strong> <strong>Customer</strong> Of <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Bazaar</strong> India<br />

Dimensions E P Mean (P) Mean (E) GAP (E-P) Sig - 2 - Significant Null Hypothesis<br />

Tangibility Tailed (S)or Not Accepted (A) or<br />

Significant(NS) Rejected (R)<br />

Ambience is excellent E1 P1 3.636363636 4.418181818 0.781818182 0.000 S R<br />

Proper parking facilities E2 P2 3.690909091 4.490909091 0.8 0.000 S R<br />

Location is very convenient E3 P3 4.054545455 4.381818182 0.327272727 0.051 NS A<br />

layout <strong>of</strong> the store is very E4 P4 3.654545455 4.290909091 0.636363636 0.001 S R<br />

convenient<br />

Facilities provided are excellent E5 P5 3.490909091 4.472727273 0.981818182 0.000 S R<br />

Proper arrangement for check E6 P6 3.254545455 4.490909091 1.236363636 0.000 S R<br />

outs in peak time<br />

store is neat and clean E7 P7 3.581818182 4.672727273 1.090909091 0.000 S R<br />

Reliability<br />

Adequate assurance <strong>of</strong> E8 P8 3.472727273 4.363636364 0.890909091 0.000 S R<br />

availability on my purchases<br />

Excellent Quality <strong>of</strong> in-house E9 P9 3.272727273 4.327272727 1.054545455 0.000 S R<br />

brands<br />

Efficient Home delivery service E10 P10 2.818181818 4.345454545 1.527272727 0.000 S R<br />

Effective Implementation <strong>of</strong> E11 P11 3.454545455 4.309090909 0.854545455 0.000 S R<br />

the loyalty schemes<br />

effectively grievances handling E12 P12 3.254545455 4.509090909 1.254545455 0.000 S R<br />

Responsiveness<br />

Helpful Staff E13 P13 3.618181818 4.636363636 1.018181818 0.000 S R<br />

No longer time for payment E14 P14 2.4 4.472727273 2.072727273 0.000 S R<br />

Staff answers my all query E15 P15 3.309090909 4.436363636 1.127272727 0.000 S R<br />

very patiently<br />

separate customer care team E16 P16 3.109090909 4.490909091 1.381818182 0.000 S R<br />

to provide quick response<br />

Assurance<br />

I feel assured buying store E17 P17 3.236363636 4.363636364 1.127272727 0.000 S R<br />

brands<br />

Staff are knowledgeable and E18 P18 3.436363636 4.490909091 1.054545455 0.000 S R<br />

courteous<br />

prices are competitive E19 P19 3.636363636 4.472727273 0.836363636 0.000 S R<br />

Empathy<br />

Staff understand my problem E20 P20 3.072727273 4.472727273 1.4 0.000 S R<br />

and need<br />

Individual attention E21 P21 2.872727273 4.254545455 1.381818182 0.000 S R<br />

Convenient operating hour E22 P22 4.109090909 4.545454545 0.436363636 0.007 S R<br />

Table 2 Rater Scaling For <strong>Big</strong> <strong>Bazaar</strong><br />

Factors Combined Combined Gap ( E-P)<br />

Mean (P) Mean(E)<br />

Tangibility 3.6233 4.4597 0.8363<br />

Reliability 3.2545 4.3709 1.1164<br />

Responsiveness 3.109 4.509 1.4<br />

Assurance 3.4363 4.4424 1.0061<br />

Empathy 3.3515 4.4242 1.0727<br />

R E F E R E N C E<br />

1 Shukla Timira (2011), "<strong>Customer</strong> <strong>Perception</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brand</strong> LIC: An Empirical Investigation" The IUP Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brand</strong><br />

Management Vol. VIII No.1 pp 48-59<br />

2 Arora R and Stoner C (1996), "The effect <strong>of</strong> perceived Service Quality and Name familiarity on the service selection decision",<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing, Vol.10, No.1 pp 22-34<br />

3 Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V A and Berry L L (1988), "SERVQUAL: A Multiple Item Scale for Measuring Consumer <strong>Perception</strong>s<br />

<strong>of</strong> Service Quality", Journal <strong>of</strong> Retailing, Vol.64, No.1, pp. 12-40<br />

4 Ernst &Young, "The Great Indian Retail Story", 2006.<br />

RESEARCH ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!