24.07.2014 Views

Boxoffice-March.20.1948

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE NATIONAL FILM WEEKLY<br />

PUBLISHED IN<br />

NINE SECTIONAL EDITIONS<br />

BEN SHLYEN<br />

Editor-in-Chief and Publisher<br />

JAMES M. JERAULD Editor<br />

NATHAN COHEN Associate Editor<br />

JESSE SHLYEN Managing Editor<br />

IVAN SPEAR<br />

Western Editor<br />

J. HARRY TOLER Equipment Editor<br />

RAYMOND LEVY General Manager<br />

Published Every Saturday by<br />

ASSOCIATED PUBLICATIONS<br />

Editorial OfBces! 9 Rockefeller Plaza, New York 20,<br />

N. Y Raymond Levy, General Manager; James M.<br />

Jerauld. Editor, Chester Friedman, Editor Showmandiser<br />

J.<br />

Section: A. Stocker, Eastern Representa-<br />

tive. Telephone Columbus 5-6370, 5-6371, 5-6372. Cable<br />

address BOXOFFICE, New York."<br />

Central OfKces: 332 South Michigan Blvd., Chicago<br />

4, 111. J. Harry Toler, Editor Modern Theatre Seclion.<br />

Telephone WABash 4575.<br />

Western Offices: 6404 Hollywood Blvd., Hollywood<br />

22, Colli. Ivan Spear, Manager. Telephone GLadstone<br />

1186.<br />

Washington Offices: 302-303 International Bldg., 1319<br />

F St., N. W. Lee L. Garling, Manager. Telephone<br />

NAtional 3482. Filmrow: 932 New Jersey, N. W. Stira<br />

London Offices: 136 Wardour St., John Sullivan, Manager.<br />

Telephone Gerrard 3934-5-6.<br />

Publication Offices: 825 Van Brunt Blvd., Kansas City<br />

1, Mo. Nathan Cohen, Associate Editor; Jesse Shlyen,<br />

Managing Editor; Morris Schlozman, Business Manager.<br />

Telephone CHestnut 7777--78.<br />

Other PubUccrtions: BOXOFFICE BAROMETER,<br />

published in November as a section of BOXOFFICE;<br />

THE MODERN THEATRE, published monthly as a<br />

section of BOXOFFICE.<br />

ALBANY—21-23 Walter Ave., M. Berrigon.<br />

ATLANTA— 163 Walton, N. W., P. H. Savin.<br />

BIRMINGHAM—The News, Eddie Badger.<br />

BOSTON—Frances W. Harding, Lib. 9814.<br />

BUFFALO- 157 Audubon Drive, Snyder, Jim Schroder.<br />

CHARLOTTE—216 W. 4th, Pauline Griffith.<br />

CHICAGO—332 S. Michigan, Jonas Perlberg,<br />

WAB-4575.<br />

CINCINNATI— 1634 Central Parkway, Ullion Seltzer.<br />

CLEVELAND—Elsie Loeb, Fairmount 0046.<br />

DALLAS—4525 Holland, V. W. Crisp, J8-9780.<br />

DENVER— 1645 Lafayette, Jack Rose, TA 8517.<br />

DES MOINES—Register & Tribune Bldg., Russ Schoch.<br />

DETROIT-1009 Fox Thecrtre Bldg., H. F. Reves.<br />

Telephones: RA 1100; Night, UN-4-a2I9.<br />

HARTFORD— 109 Westborne, Allen Widem.<br />

HARRISBURG, PA—The Telegraph, Lois Fegan.<br />

INDIANAPOLIS—Rt. 8, Box 770, Howard M. Rudeaux<br />

MIAMI—66 S. Hibiscus Island, Mrs. Manton E. Harwood.<br />

2952 Merrick Rd., Elizabeth Sudlow<br />

MEMPHIS—707 Spring St., Null Adams, Tel. 48-5462<br />

MILWAUKEE—529 N. 13th, J. R. Gahagan, MA-0297<br />

MINNEAPOLIS—29 Washington Ave. So., Les Rees<br />

NEW HAVEN—42 Church St., Gertrude Lander<br />

NEWARK, N. J.—207 Sumner, Sara Carleton.<br />

NEW ORLEANS—Mrs. Jack Auslet, MA-5812<br />

OKLAHOMA CITY— 125 NW 15th St., Polly Trrndle<br />

OMAHA—Omahct World-Herald Bldg., Lou Gerdes<br />

PHlLADELPHIA^gOl Spruce St., J. M Makler<br />

PlTTSflURGH-86 Van Broom St., R. F. Klingensmith.<br />

PORTLAND, ORE.-David C. Kahn. BR, 1181 ext 156<br />

RICHMOND-Grand Theatre, Sam Pulliam.<br />

ST. LOUIS-5149 Rosa, David Barrett, FL-3727<br />

SALT LAKE CITY—Deseret News, Howard Pearson<br />

SAN ANTONIO-333 Blum St., L. J. B. Ketner<br />

Taylor St., ^''MmJ^^f}^f^°~'^ Gail Lipman,<br />

UHdway 3-4612.<br />

SEATTLE-928 N. 84th St., Willard Elsey.<br />

TOLEDO-^330 Willys Pkwy., Anna Kline.<br />

IN CAMADA<br />

CALGARY—The Albertan, Wm. Campbell<br />

MONTREAL-4330 Wilson Ave., N. D. G., Roy Carmichael.<br />

Walnut 5519.<br />

ST. JOHN- 116 Prince Edward St., Wm. J. McNulty<br />

TORONTO-242 Milwood, Milton Galbraith.<br />

VANCOUVER-^U Lyric Theatre Bldg., Jack Droy<br />

VICTORIA-938 Island Highway, Alec Merrimon.<br />

WINNIPEG—The Tribune, Ben Lepkin.<br />

Mbmber Adidit Bureau of Circulaxiows<br />

OXOFFICE<br />

I<br />

i<br />

THE ANGLO-AMERICAN PACtI<br />

r-<br />

.^^ 7HAT old saying that half a loaf is bet<br />

ter than none may aptly be applied to the settlement of the<br />

British ad valorem tax controversy. From the cash standpoin<br />

—that is money which the American producers can take ou'<br />

of British earnings—the compromise agreement is a 50-5C<br />

proposition, for the accrued "take-out" is expected to yield<br />

approximately half of the estimated current year's Americar<br />

film earnings in Britain.<br />

Generally, the settlement is looked upon with satisfaction<br />

the negative view being in the minority. In some measure i1<br />

may be considered as a victory for the American industry, foi<br />

it does represent a considerable gain, if only in having en- .jbi<br />

tirely eUminated the principle of the ad valorem duty that hoc i<br />

been imposed. Thus the precedent-setting danger this measure<br />

held out to other countries has been eased, to say the<br />

least. From that standpoint American producers stand to gair<br />

in remittances to be derived from other foreign markets, where-i<br />

as had the British tax remained those markets, too, would hav€j| i'^(<br />

been squeezed out.<br />

I<br />

Under existing world conditions, particularly Britain's own<br />

economic circumstances, the deal is as good as could have<br />

been expected, if not a bit more than actually was expected.<br />

Further on the plus side is the possible use of the "frozen"<br />

funds remaining in England for investment that will bring some **<br />

future return. Where the money is put to building or enlarg- ^<br />

ing studio facilities and payment of salaries and other costs<br />

in the making of pictures in Britain by American companies,: u<br />

with American stars and other talent, there is, in effect, c !.,,<br />

further dollar accrual for the American industry.<br />

From the British side, their motion picture industry has<br />

been saved from not only possible, but probable, destruction.<br />

With resumption of the flow of American pictures for British -<br />

cinemas, theatre interests over there can now heave a big sigh<br />

of rehef. British producers gain as well from the assurance *c<br />

of continuing good business in England's theatres. And they:<br />

also stand to gain from the greater attentions that will be: a<br />

given to the exhibition of their productions in America, under '<br />

the terms of the settlement agreement. Not to be overlooked<br />

is the benefit to be derived by the British treasury out of the<br />

high tax collections that will come from these stepped-up in-j<br />

come-producing sources. | n<br />

In the over-all picture, the public, both in Britain andlj^^<br />

America, if not "around the world, is the ultimate beneficiary' -„<br />

from the settlement of this eight-months' old controversy. Having<br />

been used as at least one of the several invalid excuses<br />

for some of the inferior product that has come out of Hollywood,<br />

the settlement should help to clear the atmosphere and<br />

serve as a springboard for instilling new confidence on the<br />

port of the picturegoing public. And on the part of the in-i<br />

dustry, itself—in itself!<br />

I<br />

That can take almost immediate effect from the proper<br />

Entered » Second Class matter at Post Office, Kansas City. Mo.<br />

Sectional Edition, $2.00 per year; National Edition, $7.50<br />

Vol. 52 No. 20<br />

MARCH 2 0, 1948

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!