You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE NATIONAL FILM WEEKLY<br />
PUBLISHED IN<br />
NINE SECTIONAL EDITIONS<br />
BEN SHLYEN<br />
Editor-in-Chief and Publisher<br />
JAMES M. JERAULD Editor<br />
NATHAN COHEN Associate Editor<br />
JESSE SHLYEN Managing Editor<br />
IVAN SPEAR<br />
Western Editor<br />
J. HARRY TOLER Equipment Editor<br />
RAYMOND LEVY General Manager<br />
Published Every Saturday by<br />
ASSOCIATED PUBLICATIONS<br />
Editorial OfBces! 9 Rockefeller Plaza, New York 20,<br />
N. Y Raymond Levy, General Manager; James M.<br />
Jerauld. Editor, Chester Friedman, Editor Showmandiser<br />
J.<br />
Section: A. Stocker, Eastern Representa-<br />
tive. Telephone Columbus 5-6370, 5-6371, 5-6372. Cable<br />
address BOXOFFICE, New York."<br />
Central OfKces: 332 South Michigan Blvd., Chicago<br />
4, 111. J. Harry Toler, Editor Modern Theatre Seclion.<br />
Telephone WABash 4575.<br />
Western Offices: 6404 Hollywood Blvd., Hollywood<br />
22, Colli. Ivan Spear, Manager. Telephone GLadstone<br />
1186.<br />
Washington Offices: 302-303 International Bldg., 1319<br />
F St., N. W. Lee L. Garling, Manager. Telephone<br />
NAtional 3482. Filmrow: 932 New Jersey, N. W. Stira<br />
London Offices: 136 Wardour St., John Sullivan, Manager.<br />
Telephone Gerrard 3934-5-6.<br />
Publication Offices: 825 Van Brunt Blvd., Kansas City<br />
1, Mo. Nathan Cohen, Associate Editor; Jesse Shlyen,<br />
Managing Editor; Morris Schlozman, Business Manager.<br />
Telephone CHestnut 7777--78.<br />
Other PubUccrtions: BOXOFFICE BAROMETER,<br />
published in November as a section of BOXOFFICE;<br />
THE MODERN THEATRE, published monthly as a<br />
section of BOXOFFICE.<br />
ALBANY—21-23 Walter Ave., M. Berrigon.<br />
ATLANTA— 163 Walton, N. W., P. H. Savin.<br />
BIRMINGHAM—The News, Eddie Badger.<br />
BOSTON—Frances W. Harding, Lib. 9814.<br />
BUFFALO- 157 Audubon Drive, Snyder, Jim Schroder.<br />
CHARLOTTE—216 W. 4th, Pauline Griffith.<br />
CHICAGO—332 S. Michigan, Jonas Perlberg,<br />
WAB-4575.<br />
CINCINNATI— 1634 Central Parkway, Ullion Seltzer.<br />
CLEVELAND—Elsie Loeb, Fairmount 0046.<br />
DALLAS—4525 Holland, V. W. Crisp, J8-9780.<br />
DENVER— 1645 Lafayette, Jack Rose, TA 8517.<br />
DES MOINES—Register & Tribune Bldg., Russ Schoch.<br />
DETROIT-1009 Fox Thecrtre Bldg., H. F. Reves.<br />
Telephones: RA 1100; Night, UN-4-a2I9.<br />
HARTFORD— 109 Westborne, Allen Widem.<br />
HARRISBURG, PA—The Telegraph, Lois Fegan.<br />
INDIANAPOLIS—Rt. 8, Box 770, Howard M. Rudeaux<br />
MIAMI—66 S. Hibiscus Island, Mrs. Manton E. Harwood.<br />
2952 Merrick Rd., Elizabeth Sudlow<br />
MEMPHIS—707 Spring St., Null Adams, Tel. 48-5462<br />
MILWAUKEE—529 N. 13th, J. R. Gahagan, MA-0297<br />
MINNEAPOLIS—29 Washington Ave. So., Les Rees<br />
NEW HAVEN—42 Church St., Gertrude Lander<br />
NEWARK, N. J.—207 Sumner, Sara Carleton.<br />
NEW ORLEANS—Mrs. Jack Auslet, MA-5812<br />
OKLAHOMA CITY— 125 NW 15th St., Polly Trrndle<br />
OMAHA—Omahct World-Herald Bldg., Lou Gerdes<br />
PHlLADELPHIA^gOl Spruce St., J. M Makler<br />
PlTTSflURGH-86 Van Broom St., R. F. Klingensmith.<br />
PORTLAND, ORE.-David C. Kahn. BR, 1181 ext 156<br />
RICHMOND-Grand Theatre, Sam Pulliam.<br />
ST. LOUIS-5149 Rosa, David Barrett, FL-3727<br />
SALT LAKE CITY—Deseret News, Howard Pearson<br />
SAN ANTONIO-333 Blum St., L. J. B. Ketner<br />
Taylor St., ^''MmJ^^f}^f^°~'^ Gail Lipman,<br />
UHdway 3-4612.<br />
SEATTLE-928 N. 84th St., Willard Elsey.<br />
TOLEDO-^330 Willys Pkwy., Anna Kline.<br />
IN CAMADA<br />
CALGARY—The Albertan, Wm. Campbell<br />
MONTREAL-4330 Wilson Ave., N. D. G., Roy Carmichael.<br />
Walnut 5519.<br />
ST. JOHN- 116 Prince Edward St., Wm. J. McNulty<br />
TORONTO-242 Milwood, Milton Galbraith.<br />
VANCOUVER-^U Lyric Theatre Bldg., Jack Droy<br />
VICTORIA-938 Island Highway, Alec Merrimon.<br />
WINNIPEG—The Tribune, Ben Lepkin.<br />
Mbmber Adidit Bureau of Circulaxiows<br />
OXOFFICE<br />
I<br />
i<br />
THE ANGLO-AMERICAN PACtI<br />
r-<br />
.^^ 7HAT old saying that half a loaf is bet<br />
ter than none may aptly be applied to the settlement of the<br />
British ad valorem tax controversy. From the cash standpoin<br />
—that is money which the American producers can take ou'<br />
of British earnings—the compromise agreement is a 50-5C<br />
proposition, for the accrued "take-out" is expected to yield<br />
approximately half of the estimated current year's Americar<br />
film earnings in Britain.<br />
Generally, the settlement is looked upon with satisfaction<br />
the negative view being in the minority. In some measure i1<br />
may be considered as a victory for the American industry, foi<br />
it does represent a considerable gain, if only in having en- .jbi<br />
tirely eUminated the principle of the ad valorem duty that hoc i<br />
been imposed. Thus the precedent-setting danger this measure<br />
held out to other countries has been eased, to say the<br />
least. From that standpoint American producers stand to gair<br />
in remittances to be derived from other foreign markets, where-i<br />
as had the British tax remained those markets, too, would hav€j| i'^(<br />
been squeezed out.<br />
I<br />
Under existing world conditions, particularly Britain's own<br />
economic circumstances, the deal is as good as could have<br />
been expected, if not a bit more than actually was expected.<br />
Further on the plus side is the possible use of the "frozen"<br />
funds remaining in England for investment that will bring some **<br />
future return. Where the money is put to building or enlarg- ^<br />
ing studio facilities and payment of salaries and other costs<br />
in the making of pictures in Britain by American companies,: u<br />
with American stars and other talent, there is, in effect, c !.,,<br />
further dollar accrual for the American industry.<br />
From the British side, their motion picture industry has<br />
been saved from not only possible, but probable, destruction.<br />
With resumption of the flow of American pictures for British -<br />
cinemas, theatre interests over there can now heave a big sigh<br />
of rehef. British producers gain as well from the assurance *c<br />
of continuing good business in England's theatres. And they:<br />
also stand to gain from the greater attentions that will be: a<br />
given to the exhibition of their productions in America, under '<br />
the terms of the settlement agreement. Not to be overlooked<br />
is the benefit to be derived by the British treasury out of the<br />
high tax collections that will come from these stepped-up in-j<br />
come-producing sources. | n<br />
In the over-all picture, the public, both in Britain andlj^^<br />
America, if not "around the world, is the ultimate beneficiary' -„<br />
from the settlement of this eight-months' old controversy. Having<br />
been used as at least one of the several invalid excuses<br />
for some of the inferior product that has come out of Hollywood,<br />
the settlement should help to clear the atmosphere and<br />
serve as a springboard for instilling new confidence on the<br />
port of the picturegoing public. And on the part of the in-i<br />
dustry, itself—in itself!<br />
I<br />
That can take almost immediate effect from the proper<br />
Entered » Second Class matter at Post Office, Kansas City. Mo.<br />
Sectional Edition, $2.00 per year; National Edition, $7.50<br />
Vol. 52 No. 20<br />
MARCH 2 0, 1948