24.07.2014 Views

Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...

Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...

Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Stefan Leiderer et al.<br />

accounts, but rather with a more comprehensive governance perspective covering<br />

the following three areas:<br />

— The budget cycle, including strategic and budget planning, budget <strong>for</strong>mulation,<br />

budget execution and budget control and evaluation;<br />

— The legal and institutional framework;<br />

— Human and technical capacity <strong>for</strong> the management of public finances.<br />

Box 2 presents the second and third components, while the budget cycle is<br />

introduced in more detail below.<br />

Box 2:<br />

Components of PFM systems<br />

The legal PFM framework defines the overall setting <strong>for</strong> the actual design of the<br />

budget process. It should fix binding rules and regulations <strong>for</strong> budgetary practices.<br />

The legal PFM framework may incorporate constitutional regulations such as binding<br />

ceilings <strong>for</strong> the overall budget deficit and concrete budgetary regulations such<br />

as the timeframe <strong>for</strong> the different steps of the budget cycle or provisions concerning<br />

the management of public expenditures (Leiderer 2004, 8). The institutional PFM<br />

framework defines how the public budget process is organised. It determines the<br />

organisational setup of the governmental and administrative body determines the<br />

fiscal relations between the different levels of government or between the private<br />

and public sector etc. Adequate accountability structures are an important result<br />

of the legal and institutional PFM framework. The degree to which every single<br />

actor of the budget process feels or can be held accountable <strong>for</strong> budgetary practices<br />

and outcomes is a very important factor to guarantee that public resources are<br />

allocated in line with strategic policy priorities and spent effectively and efficiently.<br />

According to Schiavo-Campo / Tommasi (1999), effective accountability has two<br />

components: answerability (or responsibility) and consequences in the case of noncompliance<br />

with <strong>for</strong>mal rules and regulations.<br />

The quality and appropriateness of human and technical capacity is also a very<br />

important factor <strong>for</strong> effective and efficient PFM systems. Despite well-developed<br />

legal and institutional frameworks, human and technical capacity constraints can<br />

undermine the budget process at all stages. Many developing countries lack qualified<br />

staff in key positions <strong>for</strong> PFM such as auditors, accountants, etc. so that rules,<br />

regulations and plans cannot be executed as prescribed or intended because the<br />

responsible personnel does not have enough knowledge to carry them out correctly.<br />

Well functioning in<strong>for</strong>mation systems are another important factor <strong>for</strong> efficient<br />

28 German Development <strong>Institut</strong>e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!