24.07.2014 Views

Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...

Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...

Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Stefan Leiderer et al.<br />

the <strong>PRSP</strong> approach had been integrated into domestic institutional structures.<br />

These improvements occurred where leadership and commitment were strong<br />

and good starting conditions existed. In most cases, however, achievements<br />

have been more tentative and incremental. An IMF evaluation even concludes<br />

that the PRS approach has “acted more as a distraction from strengthening<br />

the domestic policy framework” (IMF / IEO 2004, 5) in countries<br />

where it had been externally imposed and where it was an isolated exercise.<br />

With regard to the implementation of PRS through the PFM system, the IMF<br />

evaluation team concludes:<br />

“Budgetary processes are weak, and the linkages between the <strong>PRSP</strong>, medium-term<br />

expenditure frameworks, and the budgets are generally poor. In<br />

particular, public expenditure management (PEM) systems are generally<br />

too weak to allow the <strong>PRSP</strong> to play a central role in implementing expenditure<br />

priorities or modifying them on the basis of feedback on actual costs<br />

and outcomes. Strengthening PEM has been recognized as central to the<br />

success of the initiative” (IMF / IEO 2004, 4).<br />

These findings, together with the fact that many donors are increasingly turning<br />

towards supporting <strong>PRSP</strong> implementation through budget support operations<br />

and other <strong>for</strong>ms of PBAs, lead donor agencies to shift their focus from<br />

thematic sector questions to institutional, administrative and procedural issues.<br />

This shift is increasingly affecting the quality of financial governance,<br />

i.e. planning capacities, budget transparency, fiscal discipline, or accountability,<br />

etc. Consequently, instruments promoted by the Wolrd Bank and the IMF<br />

in the second half of the 1990 such as Medium Term Expenditure Frameworks<br />

(MTEFs) are becoming more and more important.<br />

2.1.2 Decentralisation in developing countries<br />

Decentralisation is one of the most prominent re<strong>for</strong>m approaches in developing<br />

countries, strongly supported by donors. International development agencies<br />

highly value decentralisation and attach a number of expectations to,<br />

such as increased efficiency in public service delivery, local consolidation of<br />

democratic principles and more effective poverty reduction. There have been<br />

several waves of decentralisation in most developing countries (Manor 1999:<br />

part II), including sub-Saharan Africa (Ribot 2002, 4–7; Mawhood 1993).<br />

With the end of the Cold War, the approach experienced a revival triggered<br />

by the failure of centralised systems to deliver poverty reduction and overall<br />

24 German Development <strong>Institut</strong>e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!