Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...
Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...
Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Stefan Leiderer et al.<br />
and systematic integration of PFM work into international development cooperation<br />
was only recently recognised with the <strong>PRSP</strong> approach and new<br />
modes of aid delivery increasingly gaining importance. There is no universal<br />
definition of the term <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Management</strong>. In this study, PFM is<br />
used to denote the different stages of the budget process as well as the design<br />
of the legal and institutional framework <strong>for</strong> PFM and <strong>for</strong> the management of<br />
human and technical capacity that determine the effectiveness and efficiency<br />
of processes on each of these stages. The stages are strategic and budget planning,<br />
budget <strong>for</strong>mulation, budget execution as well as budget control and<br />
evaluation (Leiderer 2004, 7).<br />
The primary research focus of this study is on the PFM system because it<br />
links and ideally integrates the two prominent approaches to poverty reduction,<br />
<strong>PRSP</strong> and decentralisation. The public budget is the central tool <strong>for</strong><br />
operationalising and implementing policies based on national strategic plans.<br />
However, if a country pursues a strategy of decentralisation, it means either<br />
that a new level of government is created or the existing sub-national government<br />
levels gain power, responsibilities and resources. This fundamental<br />
reorganisation of the state has strong implications <strong>for</strong> the national PFM system.<br />
It also has to be reorganised in a way that provides <strong>for</strong> effective coordination<br />
or integration of planning, budgeting and implementation processes<br />
across the various levels.<br />
To implement just one these approaches, either <strong>PRSP</strong> or decentralisation,<br />
already is a very complex and long-term process. Nevertheless, particularly in<br />
sub-Saharan Africa, many countries are currently in the process of implementing<br />
both re<strong>for</strong>ms. For both re<strong>for</strong>m approaches to be successful, a parallel<br />
re<strong>for</strong>m of the PFM system is thus crucial. So far, most research has focussed<br />
either on <strong>PRSP</strong> and PFM or – less frequently – on decentralisation and PFM.<br />
This study tries to examine the existing and missing links, the contradictions,<br />
and the space <strong>for</strong> synergy between the implementation of <strong>PRSP</strong> and decentralisation<br />
in PFM. There<strong>for</strong>e, the main research question of this case study is<br />
the following:<br />
18 German Development <strong>Institut</strong>e