Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Stefan Leiderer et al. follows: “We got the ceilings only on Friday. But they [the authority immediately above them] got it late from MoF. And they got it late from the donors. Now we have two days to give them the budget. They just pass on the ball.” Local government elections and the dissolution of District Assemblies Local government elections are provided for in the constitution of Malawi. However, at least officially due to budget reasons, GoM did not budget for the local elections that would have been due in May 2005. The “trigger event” therefore is the lack of money provided for local elections in the budget 2004/2005. Following the constitution, the minister therefore announced on April 14, 2005 that the local assemblies stand dissolved by law effectively by March 20. Instead of elected councillors, the district commissioners and local chief executives with the support of the traditional authorities should run the district until the next elections, now planned for 2006. Soon after that message, the city assembly of Lilongwe appealed against this decision at the High Court, arguing that local councillors have been elected for five years in November 2000. On April 22, High Court ordered that the ministry should not start acting as if assemblies were dissolved until a judicial review on the matter was carried out. The official reason given subsequently for not holding the elections was that any available money was needed to buy maize in order to compensate the effects of the extremely poor 2005 harvest, stifling any serious protest. It is easy to imagine how much uncertainty this affair must have caused at local level, particularly under conditions of weak capacity and coordination. Again, an ad hoc mode of action characterises this affair. Nobody, particularly not at local level, has really thought about this problem before. Uncertainty about the exact date of new local elections has been more or less accepted. Therefore, the order to dissolve the assemblies came very surprisingly and local councillors perceived it as an ad hoc decision. The fact that district councillors, chief executives and traditional authorities should take over the responsibilities of elected councillors can be considered as an informal practice, although it has been officially announced. This practice is likely to dramatically increase uncertainty for local stakeholders and the local population about hierarchy and responsibility of the different actors at local level and therefore have a negative impact on the decentralisation process in Malawi. Temporarily government seemed to intend to postpone local elections until 2009. However, by the end of 2006, preparations for local elections seemed finally to be under way, with seven billion Kwacha set aside for the purpose. 136 German Development Institute
Public Financial Management for PRSP Implementation in Malawi The introduction of PFM reforms Although this illustration refers to the introduction of PFM reforms at local government level, the same phenomenon is also common at central government level. As a pilot project in terms of sector devolution, the responsibility for the payroll of teachers should be devolved to the districts. This time the “trigger event” was less an event, but it was the fact that coordination and communication between central and local government level was completely lacking. The training measures for preparing the devolution of the payroll was very much ad hoc from the perspective of the district education managers who were going to be responsible for managing the teacher’s payroll. Although informal practices have not yet arisen from this process, it has created a lot of uncertainty. This is not a very positive context for such an important reform. The acting DEM of Dedza district, one of the three pilot districts in Malawi, clearly illustrates that: “[On the devolution of the payroll for teachers] we got the first information in November last year. This year there was a week when we have been told what exactly this means and we have been trained on how to use the computers for that. Three districts will start, seven have been trained. I don’t know whether we fall into the first three or the last four. We have been told that we will be informed, there will be more training. We are still waiting to see. … The problem is: other people are planning, the implementers are somewhere else. We’re only told: come here. We will tell you when to continue. So, we are waiting, we have not yet been told.” 7.2.2 Why formal PFM rules are undermined As has been discussed in the last chapter, the causes for current PFM practice in Malawi being characterised by uncertainty, ad hoc mode of planning and budgeting and informal practices have their roots in five key areas. In order to understand the mechanisms at work, it is, however, necessary to take a closer look at the inner workings of this phenomenon. This analysis cannot be comprehensive due to the manifold interrelations between the various shortcomings in the five areas identified above and between the features of uncertainty, ad hoc behaviour and informal practices, Therefore, only the most relevant relations impacting on PFM performance are presented. German Development Institute 137
Page 3 and 4:
Public Financial Management for PRS
Page 5 and 6:
Studies Deutsches Institut für Ent
Page 7:
Preface The present study on ‘Pub
Page 10 and 11:
4 The Case of Malawi 44 4.1 Why Mal
Page 12 and 13:
Bibliography 151 Annexes 157 Tables
Page 14 and 15:
Boxes and Tables in the Annexes Box
Page 16 and 17:
DS EHP ESAF EU GBS GDP GoM GRF GTZ
Page 18 and 19:
TOR UDF UNCDF UNDP UNV USAID VAP VD
Page 20 and 21:
Stefan Leiderer et al. PRSP impleme
Page 22 and 23:
Stefan Leiderer et al. A particular
Page 24 and 25:
Stefan Leiderer et al. come to vary
Page 26 and 27:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Particularly
Page 28 and 29:
Stefan Leiderer et al. donors are s
Page 30 and 31:
Stefan Leiderer et al. - Improved c
Page 32 and 33:
Stefan Leiderer et al. medium- to l
Page 34 and 35:
Stefan Leiderer et al. tion of the
Page 36 and 37:
Stefan Leiderer et al. and systemat
Page 38 and 39:
Stefan Leiderer et al. The methods
Page 40 and 41:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Part I: Conc
Page 42 and 43:
Stefan Leiderer et al. the PRSP app
Page 44 and 45:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Those arguin
Page 46 and 47:
Stefan Leiderer et al. accounts, bu
Page 48 and 49:
Stefan Leiderer et al. It must be n
Page 50 and 51:
Stefan Leiderer et al. The typical
Page 52 and 53:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Administrati
Page 54 and 55:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Figure 2: Le
Page 56 and 57:
Stefan Leiderer et al. ety may have
Page 58 and 59:
Stefan Leiderer et al. 9. Transpare
Page 60 and 61:
Stefan Leiderer et al. The main res
Page 62 and 63:
Stefan Leiderer et al. 3.3 Structur
Page 64 and 65:
Stefan Leiderer et al. never gained
Page 66 and 67:
Stefan Leiderer et al. its relevanc
Page 68 and 69:
Stefan Leiderer et al. pronounced i
Page 70 and 71:
Stefan Leiderer et al. — Several
Page 72 and 73:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Table 1: Pop
Page 74 and 75:
Stefan Leiderer et al. more by info
Page 76 and 77:
Stefan Leiderer et al. tion of the
Page 78 and 79:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Table 2: The
Page 80 and 81:
Stefan Leiderer et al. ing due to o
Page 82 and 83:
Stefan Leiderer et al. authorised t
Page 84 and 85:
Stefan Leiderer et al. (in particul
Page 86 and 87:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Figure 3: In
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Figure 5: Institutional Setup of Ma
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Box 10: The formal and informal ins
Page 99 and 100:
MTEF Stage 6 MoF holds consultation
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104: Public Financial Management for PRS
Page 121 and 122: Table 6: GRF Allocations Approved e
Page 151 and 152: Figure 10: PFM under uncertainty Ca
Page 153: Public Financial Management for PRS
Page 175: Annexes
Page 178 and 179: Stefan Leiderer et al. are employed
Page 180 and 181: Stefan Leiderer et al. During the f
Page 182 and 183: Stefan Leiderer et al. Box A 1: Tri
Page 184 and 185: Stefan Leiderer et al. The politica
Page 186 and 187: Stefan Leiderer et al. Annex 2 Tabl
Page 188 and 189: Stefan Leiderer et al. Mayesa, Mr.
Page 190 and 191: Stefan Leiderer et al. Thole, Pamel
Page 192 and 193: Stefan Leiderer et al. 6 Committee
Page 194 and 195: Stefan Leiderer et al. Chanza, Bill
Page 196 and 197: Stefan Leiderer et al. Full Assembl
Page 198 and 199: Stefan Leiderer et al. owned busine
Page 201 and 202: Publications of the German Developm
Page 203 and 204: Discussion Paper 16/2007 Schirm, St
show all

Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?