Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...
Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...
Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Stefan Leiderer et al.<br />
ment. The section outlines the efficiency of coordination of governmental<br />
institutions such as the Decentralisation Secretariat (DS), the Ministry of<br />
Local Government and Rural Development (MoLGRD) and the National<br />
Local Government Finance Committee (NLGFC). Finally, it discusses the<br />
necessity of an operational link between strategic plans of central and local<br />
governments.<br />
Vertical coordination in general<br />
Vertical coordination of PFM between central and local government level is<br />
relatively well established and legally institutionalised in Malawi. Centrallocal<br />
coordination can be characterised as a system of hierarchy and dependency.<br />
It is not a system of coordination between central and local level of<br />
government in the sense of cooperation between equals, mutual agreement<br />
and in<strong>for</strong>mation. Sometimes coordination between the two levels of government<br />
does not work well. These deficits then have severe consequences <strong>for</strong><br />
the functioning of the PFM system of the local authorities.<br />
Local governments depend heavily on central governmental transfers such as<br />
the General Resource Fund (GRF) to finance their administrations. According<br />
to the <strong>Financial</strong> Reporting Guidelines <strong>for</strong> Local Authorities transfers are<br />
withheld when the local authorities do not submit financial reports to the<br />
NLGFC on time. On the other hand, central government sometimes withholds<br />
the transfers due to lack of financial resources or political reasons. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />
the link between per<strong>for</strong>mance and financial transfers is not always clear to<br />
local authorities. Sometimes they do not receive funds, although they fulfilled<br />
all <strong>for</strong>mal requirements. Consequently, the sanctioning mechanism of withholding<br />
funds does not work as an effective incentive mechanism. If transfers<br />
are cut back or delayed, the dependency of the local PFM system on central<br />
government funds becomes visible: District secretariats are responsible <strong>for</strong><br />
training committees at sub-district levels in planning processes required <strong>for</strong><br />
preparing the DDPs. However, frequently such training cannot take place<br />
because the central government does not transfer the required resources. In<br />
other cases, the DA stepped in and deviated funds from other sources <strong>for</strong> TAs<br />
to receive the needed training.<br />
Local authorities depend on receiving important in<strong>for</strong>mation from central<br />
level on time. When central government in<strong>for</strong>ms local authorities about ceilings<br />
later than the PFM Act requires, the districts still need to submit their<br />
budgets on time in order to avoid sanctioning mechanisms to apply. How-<br />
114 German Development <strong>Institut</strong>e