24.07.2014 Views

Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...

Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...

Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Stefan Leiderer et al.<br />

6.3 Donor impact on PFM<br />

Malawi is even more dependent on <strong>for</strong>eign aid to finance its balance of payments<br />

and public expenditures than most other African countries (IDD and<br />

Associates 2005, 18). Up to 80 % of the capital budget and around 23 % of<br />

Malawi’s GDP are donor-financed (Whitworth 2005, 1). Consequently, donors<br />

interfere in many ways and at various levels in Malawi’s PFM.<br />

Three areas appear to be most problematic to Malawian stakeholders: lack of<br />

predictability of donor funds; different, complicated and poorly harmonised<br />

donor procedures; and insufficient donor support <strong>for</strong> the adoption of PFM<br />

re<strong>for</strong>ms.<br />

6.3.1 Lack of predictability of donor funding<br />

The high dependency on external aid creates special problems <strong>for</strong> Malawi’s<br />

government in terms of in-year monetary management and it is an important<br />

factor behind the observed fiscal volatility and budget deviations.<br />

To make matters worse, as Figure 7 on page 96 illustrates aid flows to Malawi<br />

are highly volatile and ODA commitments have been systematically<br />

higher than actual ODA inflows. According to a recent evaluation of general<br />

budget support 32 <strong>for</strong> Malawi, the share of external resources has fluctuated<br />

between 33 and 57 percent of total inflows since the mid-nineties (IDD and<br />

Associates 2005, 6). Consequently, ODA flows are highly unpredictable <strong>for</strong><br />

the Government of Malawi and commitments contain little in<strong>for</strong>mation on<br />

actual future inflows (IMF 2004b, 43; see Figure 8).<br />

32 Malawi was not receiving general budget support (GBS) when this research was conducted<br />

in 2005. Only the UK and the EU had GBS programmes. However, while DFID had<br />

pledged £ 68m <strong>for</strong> the 2005/2006 budget, the EU had stopped disbursing when Malawi had<br />

gone off-track. Other donors organised in the CABS (Common Approach to Budget Support)-Group,<br />

were considering providing budget support but had not taken a final decision<br />

(Whitworth 2005).<br />

106 German Development <strong>Institut</strong>e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!