Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...
Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...
Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Stefan Leiderer et al.<br />
6.3 Donor impact on PFM<br />
Malawi is even more dependent on <strong>for</strong>eign aid to finance its balance of payments<br />
and public expenditures than most other African countries (IDD and<br />
Associates 2005, 18). Up to 80 % of the capital budget and around 23 % of<br />
Malawi’s GDP are donor-financed (Whitworth 2005, 1). Consequently, donors<br />
interfere in many ways and at various levels in Malawi’s PFM.<br />
Three areas appear to be most problematic to Malawian stakeholders: lack of<br />
predictability of donor funds; different, complicated and poorly harmonised<br />
donor procedures; and insufficient donor support <strong>for</strong> the adoption of PFM<br />
re<strong>for</strong>ms.<br />
6.3.1 Lack of predictability of donor funding<br />
The high dependency on external aid creates special problems <strong>for</strong> Malawi’s<br />
government in terms of in-year monetary management and it is an important<br />
factor behind the observed fiscal volatility and budget deviations.<br />
To make matters worse, as Figure 7 on page 96 illustrates aid flows to Malawi<br />
are highly volatile and ODA commitments have been systematically<br />
higher than actual ODA inflows. According to a recent evaluation of general<br />
budget support 32 <strong>for</strong> Malawi, the share of external resources has fluctuated<br />
between 33 and 57 percent of total inflows since the mid-nineties (IDD and<br />
Associates 2005, 6). Consequently, ODA flows are highly unpredictable <strong>for</strong><br />
the Government of Malawi and commitments contain little in<strong>for</strong>mation on<br />
actual future inflows (IMF 2004b, 43; see Figure 8).<br />
32 Malawi was not receiving general budget support (GBS) when this research was conducted<br />
in 2005. Only the UK and the EU had GBS programmes. However, while DFID had<br />
pledged £ 68m <strong>for</strong> the 2005/2006 budget, the EU had stopped disbursing when Malawi had<br />
gone off-track. Other donors organised in the CABS (Common Approach to Budget Support)-Group,<br />
were considering providing budget support but had not taken a final decision<br />
(Whitworth 2005).<br />
106 German Development <strong>Institut</strong>e