Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Stefan Leiderer et al. In addition, as a key element the distribution is supposed to “encourage Local Assemblies to raise more own revenues” (Decentralisation Secretariat 2005, 1). However, this performance-based element of the formula is not yet being applied. According to the National Decentralisation Programme I and II, five percent of the total (net) national government revenue (NNR) 29 should be allocated to districts through the GRF. However, as can be seen in Table 6, actual allocations have been much lower in the past and – possibly even worse – are highly unpredictable for District Assemblies. This leaves local governments severely under-funded with regard to recurrent expenditure for administrative activities and service delivery. Local governments thus often cannot allocate the required 25 % of GRF transfers to development activities because they need these funds to cover administrative and other recurrent costs (GFA 2005, 50). The cases of Dedza and Rumphi help to illustrate the relative importance of GRF allocations for rural districts. GRF allocations account for roughly 29 percent (Dedza) and 16 percent (Rumphi) of the assemblies’ respective total income. Given this heavy dependency on GRF transfers and the fact that they are used mainly to pay salaries, there is an argument that the distribution of GRF funds between districts according to poverty indicators may be inappropriate (GFA 2005, 53). 29 Excluding grants. 102 German Development Institute
Table 6: GRF Allocations Approved estimates 2001/2002 Revised estimates 2001/2002 Estimate 2002/2003 Actual 2002/2003 Approved 2003/2004 Actual 2003/2004 Revised 2004/2005 Projection 2005/2006 GRF actual as % of NNR 1.00 % 1.39 % 1.06 % 0.71 % 0.72 % 0.76 % 1.06 % 0.96 % Actual as % of expected 5 % 25.12 % 27.74 % 21.24 % 14.16 % 14.42 % 15.23 % 21.14 % 19.29 % Source: NLGFC data provided by GTZ-MGPDD
Page 3 and 4:
Public Financial Management for PRS
Page 5 and 6:
Studies Deutsches Institut für Ent
Page 7:
Preface The present study on ‘Pub
Page 10 and 11:
4 The Case of Malawi 44 4.1 Why Mal
Page 12 and 13:
Bibliography 151 Annexes 157 Tables
Page 14 and 15:
Boxes and Tables in the Annexes Box
Page 16 and 17:
DS EHP ESAF EU GBS GDP GoM GRF GTZ
Page 18 and 19:
TOR UDF UNCDF UNDP UNV USAID VAP VD
Page 20 and 21:
Stefan Leiderer et al. PRSP impleme
Page 22 and 23:
Stefan Leiderer et al. A particular
Page 24 and 25:
Stefan Leiderer et al. come to vary
Page 26 and 27:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Particularly
Page 28 and 29:
Stefan Leiderer et al. donors are s
Page 30 and 31:
Stefan Leiderer et al. - Improved c
Page 32 and 33:
Stefan Leiderer et al. medium- to l
Page 34 and 35:
Stefan Leiderer et al. tion of the
Page 36 and 37:
Stefan Leiderer et al. and systemat
Page 38 and 39:
Stefan Leiderer et al. The methods
Page 40 and 41:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Part I: Conc
Page 42 and 43:
Stefan Leiderer et al. the PRSP app
Page 44 and 45:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Those arguin
Page 46 and 47:
Stefan Leiderer et al. accounts, bu
Page 48 and 49:
Stefan Leiderer et al. It must be n
Page 50 and 51:
Stefan Leiderer et al. The typical
Page 52 and 53:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Administrati
Page 54 and 55:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Figure 2: Le
Page 56 and 57:
Stefan Leiderer et al. ety may have
Page 58 and 59:
Stefan Leiderer et al. 9. Transpare
Page 60 and 61:
Stefan Leiderer et al. The main res
Page 62 and 63:
Stefan Leiderer et al. 3.3 Structur
Page 64 and 65:
Stefan Leiderer et al. never gained
Page 66 and 67:
Stefan Leiderer et al. its relevanc
Page 68 and 69:
Stefan Leiderer et al. pronounced i
Page 70 and 71: Stefan Leiderer et al. — Several
Page 72 and 73: Stefan Leiderer et al. Table 1: Pop
Page 74 and 75: Stefan Leiderer et al. more by info
Page 76 and 77: Stefan Leiderer et al. tion of the
Page 78 and 79: Stefan Leiderer et al. Table 2: The
Page 80 and 81: Stefan Leiderer et al. ing due to o
Page 82 and 83: Stefan Leiderer et al. authorised t
Page 84 and 85: Stefan Leiderer et al. (in particul
Page 86 and 87: Stefan Leiderer et al. Figure 3: In
Page 89 and 90: Public Financial Management for PRS
Page 93 and 94: Figure 5: Institutional Setup of Ma
Page 97 and 98: Box 10: The formal and informal ins
Page 99 and 100: MTEF Stage 6 MoF holds consultation
Page 119: Public Financial Management for PRS
Page 151 and 152: Figure 10: PFM under uncertainty Ca
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175:
Annexes
Page 178 and 179:
Stefan Leiderer et al. are employed
Page 180 and 181:
Stefan Leiderer et al. During the f
Page 182 and 183:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Box A 1: Tri
Page 184 and 185:
Stefan Leiderer et al. The politica
Page 186 and 187:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Annex 2 Tabl
Page 188 and 189:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Mayesa, Mr.
Page 190 and 191:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Thole, Pamel
Page 192 and 193:
Stefan Leiderer et al. 6 Committee
Page 194 and 195:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Chanza, Bill
Page 196 and 197:
Stefan Leiderer et al. Full Assembl
Page 198 and 199:
Stefan Leiderer et al. owned busine
Page 201 and 202:
Publications of the German Developm
Page 203 and 204:
Discussion Paper 16/2007 Schirm, St
show all

Public Financial Management for PRSP - Deutsches Institut für ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?