Experiences of Farmers in India Experiences of Farmers in ... - AgSri
Experiences of Farmers in India Experiences of Farmers in ... - AgSri Experiences of Farmers in India Experiences of Farmers in ... - AgSri
Farmers’ Experiences Lessons learnt By applying SRI, farmers can save a lot of water, electricity as well as other natural resource while increasing production of rice. Comparative study Particulars Conventional method SRI method Date of nursery sown 30/5/2008 30/5/2008 Date of transplantation 3/7/2008 11/6/2008 Date of harvest 25/10/2008 13/10/2008 Weed control 1200 ml Butachlor 3 times weeding with Conoweeder FYM (t/acre) Nil 4 Fertilizer (Urea in kg per acre) 110 25 No. of productive tillers/m 2 240 (mean of 10 observations) No. of grains/panicle 130 225 Wt of grain per panicle (gm) 3.65 7.35 Length of panicle (cm) 28.70 32.12 Chaffy grain (%) 26 21 No of plant / m 2 (mean of 10 14 16 samples) Grain yield (t/acre) 1.86 2.52 Crop duration (days) 139 136 376 (mean of 10 observations) Suggestions To make credit facility available to farmers. To make a motorized Conoweeder available. To standardize SRI practices according to Punjab situation. 67
Punjab Kapil Behal along with state officers during a field visit 68
- Page 29 and 30: Gujarat Girish Mansirav Chaudhary S
- Page 31 and 32: Gujarat Comparative study Particula
- Page 33 and 34: Himachal Pradesh Chamaru Ram Lohark
- Page 35 and 36: Himachal Pradesh Particulars Conven
- Page 37 and 38: Himachal Pradesh Benefits Less se
- Page 39 and 40: Himachal Pradesh Saraswati Devi Duh
- Page 41 and 42: Himachal Pradesh Tilak Raj Kardiana
- Page 43 and 44: Himachal Pradesh Particulars Conven
- Page 45 and 46: Jammu & Kashmir Benefits Lower
- Page 47 and 48: Jharkhand Janeshwar Singh Hulsam, T
- Page 49 and 50: Kerala A. Sasidharan Pillai Nellana
- Page 51 and 52: Kerala other farmers visited his pa
- Page 53 and 54: Kerala Lessons learnt Line planting
- Page 55 and 56: Kerala Lessons learnt Suitable fo
- Page 57 and 58: Madhya Pradesh Date of Sowing 02.07
- Page 59 and 60: Madhya Pradesh Shivji Kushram Moiya
- Page 61 and 62: Madhya Pradesh Due to small size
- Page 63 and 64: Madhya Pradesh Fifth Step: Weed man
- Page 65 and 66: Orissa Debahari Gouda Jugudi Orissa
- Page 67 and 68: Orissa Debraj Das Chandanpur Orissa
- Page 69 and 70: Orissa Madhu Pradhan Odagaon Block,
- Page 71 and 72: Orissa Surendra Masti Mahadeiput, K
- Page 73 and 74: Orissa he could observe was increas
- Page 75 and 76: Pondicherry Ramasamy #47, Middle St
- Page 77 and 78: Pondicherry Selvanathan #12, Mariam
- Page 79: Punjab Kapil Behal Hayat Nagar Punj
- Page 83 and 84: Tamil Nadu Benefits Less seed, le
- Page 85 and 86: Tamil Nadu K. Swaminathan Agraharam
- Page 87 and 88: Tamil Nadu Lessons learnt Subsi
- Page 89 and 90: Tamil Nadu V.K.V. Ravichandran Poon
- Page 91 and 92: Tamil Nadu Still on the learning cu
- Page 93 and 94: Tamil Nadu A labour showing the rop
- Page 95 and 96: Tripura Innovations and modificatio
- Page 97 and 98: Tripura Suggestions In case of
- Page 99 and 100: Tripura The inputs he used include
- Page 101 and 102: Uttarakhand Chain Singh Masaon Tehr
- Page 103 and 104: Uttarakhand Particulars Average num
- Page 105 and 106: Uttarakhand Innovations and modific
- Page 107 and 108: Uttarakhand Sarla Devi Doni Palli T
- Page 109 and 110: Uttarakhand Particulars Conventiona
- Page 111 and 112: Uttarakhand Benefits Less usa
- Page 113 and 114: Resource materials on SRI
<strong>Farmers</strong>’ <strong>Experiences</strong><br />
Lessons learnt<br />
<br />
By apply<strong>in</strong>g SRI, farmers can save a lot <strong>of</strong> water, electricity as well as other<br />
natural resource while <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g production <strong>of</strong> rice.<br />
Comparative study<br />
Particulars Conventional method SRI method<br />
Date <strong>of</strong> nursery sown 30/5/2008 30/5/2008<br />
Date <strong>of</strong> transplantation 3/7/2008 11/6/2008<br />
Date <strong>of</strong> harvest 25/10/2008 13/10/2008<br />
Weed control 1200 ml Butachlor 3 times weed<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
Conoweeder<br />
FYM (t/acre) Nil 4<br />
Fertilizer (Urea <strong>in</strong> kg per acre) 110 25<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> productive tillers/m 2 240 (mean <strong>of</strong> 10<br />
observations)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> gra<strong>in</strong>s/panicle 130 225<br />
Wt <strong>of</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> per panicle (gm) 3.65 7.35<br />
Length <strong>of</strong> panicle (cm) 28.70 32.12<br />
Chaffy gra<strong>in</strong> (%) 26 21<br />
No <strong>of</strong> plant / m 2 (mean <strong>of</strong> 10 14 16<br />
samples)<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> yield (t/acre) 1.86 2.52<br />
Crop duration (days) 139 136<br />
376 (mean <strong>of</strong> 10<br />
observations)<br />
Suggestions<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
To make credit facility available to farmers.<br />
To make a motorized Conoweeder available.<br />
To standardize SRI practices accord<strong>in</strong>g to Punjab situation.<br />
67