The Collected Works of EDITH STEIN ON THE PROBLEM OF EMPATHY
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2<br />
Edith Stein<br />
Empathy as the Understanding <strong>of</strong> Spiritual Persons<br />
il3<br />
125> Only in the last case can we say that there is no spiritual person<br />
present. In all other cases r+'e must not put the person's nonunfblding<br />
on a par with his non-existence. Rather, the spiritual<br />
person also exists even if he is not unfolded. As the realization <strong>of</strong><br />
the spiritual person, the psycho-physical individual can be called<br />
the "empirical person." As "nature" he is subject to the laws <strong>of</strong><br />
causality, as "spirit" to the lal's <strong>of</strong> meaning. Also that meaningful<br />
context <strong>of</strong> psychic attributes <strong>of</strong> $'hich we spoke earlier, by virtue<br />
<strong>of</strong> which the comprehensior-r <strong>of</strong> one attribute reasonably motivates<br />
progress to the other, is his only as a personal one. Finest<br />
sensitivity to ethical values and a u'ill leaving them completely<br />
unheeded and only allowing itself to be guided by sensual motives<br />
do not go together in the unity <strong>of</strong> a meaning, are unintelligible.<br />
And so an action also bids for understanding. It is not merely to<br />
be carried out empathically as a single experience, but experienced<br />
as proceeding meaningfully from the total structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />
person.l33<br />
6. <strong>The</strong> Existence <strong>of</strong> the Spirit<br />
Simmel has said that the intelligibility <strong>of</strong> characters vouches fbr<br />
their objectivity, that it constitutes "historical truth." To be sure,<br />
he does n()t distinguish this truth from poetic truth. A creature <strong>of</strong><br />
the free imap;ination can also be an intelligible person. Moreover,<br />
histr>rical objects must be real. Some kind <strong>of</strong> point <strong>of</strong> depirrture,<br />
such as a trait <strong>of</strong> the historical character, must be given to me itr<br />
order to demonstratc the meaninp; context the object reveals to<br />
me as an historical {act. But rf I get possession r>f it, in whatever<br />
fflanner, I have an existil.rg product attcl not a merely thntasized<br />
one. In empathic comprehension <strong>of</strong>'the foreign spiritual individual,<br />
I also have the possibilrty <strong>of</strong> bringing his unverified behavior<br />
t