The Collected Works of EDITH STEIN ON THE PROBLEM OF EMPATHY

21.07.2014 Views

Prtfoce to the Third Edition Prtfoce to the Firs t and Second Editiofls hen the Institute of \ / Carmelite Studies asked me to pre- Y Y pare a new edition of my translation of Edith Stein's doctoral dissertation for their series of her collected works in English, I was delighted to do so, because a wider audience will now have the opportunity to examine a young scholar's rigorous and technical work in the light of her later reputation as a powerful and revered spiritual giant. At this time, about thirty years afrer presenting this translation as my thesis for the degree of Masrer of Philosophy, I find myself again drawn to my great-aunt's work, this time as a guide to living the Christian life fully and deepll'. I am srruck by the fact that she returned to scholarly work in a new way after her conversion to Christianity and continued in this work for the remainder of her lif'e. This teaches me thar God expects me to use all of my gifts in His service and challenges me to find a way ro do so rather than withdrawing from the exigencies of this earthli life. I rvant to thank Sr. Mary Catharine Baseheart for her encouragement and her thoughtful foreword and Reverend John Sullivan for his generous help in preparing this neu,edition. Waltraut Stein, Ph.D. Atlanta, Georgia October, 1988 he translation of Zurn Problem d,er Einfi,-hlung presented here is a translation of the doctoral diss.z:rtation of'Edith Stein, done under Edmund Husserl. -I'he degre 4 \\'as awarded tn l9l6 at the University of Freiburg in Breisgiu, and the dissertation in this form n'as published in ig t 7 at U'alte. t -I-he title of the treatise originalll' rvas Das Einfi)htungsproblem in sein er historischen Entuichlung und in phiinomenologisiei Betrachtu.ag [The Empathy Problem as It Dneloped Historicail and. ConsideyT d Phlttomenologicallyl.'I'he first historical chapter u'as omitred i1 . publication and seems no longer to be extant. This work is a description of the narure of errr pathy within the f ranter+'ork of Husserl's phenomenologl as pre . ented nrairtly in Volume I of ldeas' As Husserl's assistanl, Edith Frad the opportunity to become intimately acquainted with his 1 rinking. In fact, she edited Volume ll of ldeas (cf. Husserl iar La IY, Martinus N1ihotr, 1952) which deals to a large exrenr u,it]-, the same problems as her own work on empathy. -lhough she c aims not to have seen Volume II before completing herlwn wr:rk (see Au.thor's Foreword), she had evidently been iollowing Hu...serl very closely as he was at that time r.r,orking out his ideas.-Thu: her dissertation clearly shorvs how she has develol>ecl her inter'i)retation rlf the "-\ .prper lrrr k r t.prirrl , rf t hr I l:rllc r,

xiv Edith Stein problem of empathy in terms of u'hat Husserl later presented in ihis '^'ih.*ork left unpublished bv him' ,lg.tifi.ar,.. of the work by E' Stein presented n::t ^I: becomes evident when considered in relation to Maurice U".f.^"-p"nty's influen tial Ph'enom'enologie de la perceptiozi'r Since Merlear'r-Pontv had access to the same unpublished manuscript of Volume Il of ideas,a number of his most important and irltere.sting formulations take on a striking similarity to those ot L' stelrl' 'Ihis is particularly true of the coricept of the lived or living body (Le '" CorPs a1cu or Leib)' t;; i."rs after the completiono{ E' Stein's work on empathy' H;;;'p..r.,',t.d hts Caitesian Med'i'tations in French (1931)' which is now also available in English (Martinus Nijhoff' 1960)' In this work, however, Husserl is eirphasizing a somewhat different ;;p:;t;i the problem of t*pati'y t the possibili'tv of !h" lltt rather than the phenomenolo[ical description of this other' Thus Cartesian Meditattons is more in contrast with his earlier conceptiotrs tharl similar to them' This also means that E' Stein's u'ork on empathy is in contras t with Cartesian Meditations' However' both n. 3t.irl'u.ta Husserl adhere in all these works to the necessity for a ohenomenological reduction to Pure consciousness' Therefore' ;ti.;.;; ;; ioiria.,ta rvorks oi phenomenology in the strict Husserlian sense. -fhe last third of E. Stein's chapter on "The Essence of Acts of Empathy" consists of a careful critique of Scheler's conceptron oI .*i".ni presented in his first edition of Sympathiegefuhle (1913)' Scheler considered Steirr's ar-ralysis so pertinent that he referred to it three times in the second edition of this work (1923)'2 This, then, is how Zum Problem der EinJi)hlun-g fits. into the history of the phenomenological movement' On the other hand' the reader must not out'loik that fact that E' Stein has made some original contributions to the phenomenological.description o{' the nature of empathy' Some tf th"tt contributions' as the translator understands them, will tle considered in the following introduction to the work' At this time I want to acknowledge my indebtlqlttt- 1o. Dr' James Shericlan' director of my master'-s thesis at Ohto Untversitt', in connection with rvhich ihis translution was made' It is he Pr{ace to the First and Second Editions ,vho first led me ro an understanding of the phenomenological ,rosirion and the contents of E. Stein's rvork. Also Alfred Schuetz, 'H".b.tt Spiegelberg, William Earle' as well as my fellow graduate ,tud.r.,tt ai Northwestern University, have been most helpful by their suggestiot.ts, corrections, and encouragement' However,.,I mvself u.tu-" full responsibility for any errors that may still r"irrain in this translation. xv Waltraut Stein, Ph.D. l 964

Prtfoce to the Third<br />

Edition<br />

Prtfoce to the Firs t and<br />

Second Editi<strong>of</strong>ls<br />

hen the Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

\ /<br />

Carmelite Studies asked me to pre-<br />

Y Y pare a new edition <strong>of</strong> my translation <strong>of</strong> Edith Stein's<br />

doctoral dissertation for their series <strong>of</strong> her collected works in<br />

English, I was delighted to do so, because a wider audience will<br />

now have the opportunity to examine a young scholar's rigorous<br />

and technical work in the light <strong>of</strong> her later reputation as a powerful<br />

and revered spiritual giant.<br />

At this time, about thirty years afrer presenting this translation<br />

as my thesis for the degree <strong>of</strong> Masrer <strong>of</strong> Philosophy, I find myself<br />

again drawn to my great-aunt's work, this time as a guide to living<br />

the Christian life fully and deepll'. I am srruck by the fact that she<br />

returned to scholarly work in a new way after her conversion to<br />

Christianity and continued in this work for the remainder <strong>of</strong> her<br />

lif'e. This teaches me thar God expects me to use all <strong>of</strong> my gifts in<br />

His service and challenges me to find a way ro do so rather than<br />

withdrawing from the exigencies <strong>of</strong> this earthli life.<br />

I rvant to thank Sr. Mary Catharine Baseheart for her encouragement<br />

and her thoughtful foreword and Reverend John Sullivan<br />

for his generous help in preparing this neu,edition.<br />

Waltraut Stein, Ph.D.<br />

Atlanta, Georgia<br />

October, 1988<br />

he translation <strong>of</strong> Zurn Problem d,er Einfi,-hlung presented<br />

here is a translation <strong>of</strong> the doctoral diss.z:rtation <strong>of</strong>'Edith<br />

Stein, done under Edmund Husserl. -I'he degre 4 \\'as awarded tn<br />

l9l6 at the University <strong>of</strong> Freiburg in Breisgiu, and the dissertation<br />

in this form n'as published in ig t 7 at U'alte. t -I-he title <strong>of</strong> the<br />

treatise originalll' rvas Das Einfi)htungsproblem in sein er historischen<br />

Entuichlung und in phiinomenologisiei Betrachtu.ag [<strong>The</strong> Empathy<br />

Problem as It Dneloped Historicail and. ConsideyT d Phlttomenologicallyl.'I'he<br />

first historical chapter u'as omitred i1 . publication and<br />

seems no longer to be extant.<br />

This work is a description <strong>of</strong> the narure <strong>of</strong> errr pathy within the<br />

f ranter+'ork <strong>of</strong> Husserl's phenomenologl as pre . ented nrairtly in<br />

Volume I <strong>of</strong> ldeas' As Husserl's assistanl, Edith Frad the opportunity<br />

to become intimately acquainted with his 1 rinking. In fact,<br />

she edited Volume ll <strong>of</strong> ldeas (cf. Husserl iar La IY, Martinus<br />

N1ihotr, 1952) which deals to a large exrenr u,it]-, the same problems<br />

as her own work on empathy. -lhough she c aims not to have<br />

seen Volume II before completing herlwn wr:rk<br />

(see Au.thor's<br />

Foreword), she had evidently been iollowing Hu...serl very closely<br />

as he was at that time r.r,orking out his ideas.-Thu: her dissertation<br />

clearly shorvs how she has develol>ecl her inter'i)retation rlf the<br />

"-\ .prper<br />

lrrr k r t.prirrl , rf t hr I l:rllc r,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!